Newest Message: Twitter but not Facebook /t by MAl cD on 19/1/2018, 21:00:45 - View Thread

38

Thread: 90569

Cadman by Fendog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 18:00:15, 177 views.

Thought cadman was excellent today. Hope he gets a run in the team now.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.166.123.65

RE: Cadman by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 18:04:46, 156 views. In reply to 'Cadman'

Agreed. He deserves to start at Hyde now.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.95.43

RE: RE: Cadman by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 18:15:28, 159 views. In reply to 'RE: Cadman'

He was given MOM. I just believe he thinks so much quicker than our other midfielders & has a great touch and awareness of his fellow players. He looks to attack at speed and most people around me were shocked when he was subbed (although there is often more to substitutions than meets the eye). The new guy looked very solid & composed when he came on & should start next week for me if that was anything to go by.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

RE: RE: RE: Cadman by Dunno

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 19:19:10, 141 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Cadman'

Cadman seemed to make a huge difference when he came last year. Think he came just before the start of the unbeaten run at the end of the season and created a great link between midfield and forwards which was missing before that. I agree he seems to be mentally one step ahead.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.13.151.87

Re: Cadman by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 21:25:48, 136 views. In reply to 'RE: Cadman'

I agree Cadman deserves to start next time. Enjoyable and well won game with a real team effort, but in particular, I think that it is one of the best all round midfield performances I’ve seen in a while. The ball moved forwards quickly with a good variety of passes and they added support for the defence when necessary. Cadman made a difference. Was disappointed when he came off, but I get that he has not had much game time and so perhaps might have run out of steam a bit. The new loaned looks useful too.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 5.69.8.111

Thread: 90567

Golden gamble by To move

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 17:56:01, 116 views.

Was it claimed? Well done boro,vital 3 points

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.156.90.13

yes by gamblegirl

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 22:44:32, 100 views. In reply to 'Golden gamble'

it was so David told me. He walked round with the white board after my fall on the steps. We really need seat grabbers or the like before a really nasty accident occurs

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.52.182.40

RE: yes by beckywitch User: beckywitch

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 08:33:23, 83 views. In reply to 'yes'

Oh, no. Didn’t know you’d fallen. Hope you are ok today?

beckywitch

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.217.142.216

Still a bit by Gamblegirl

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 10:47:02, 73 views. In reply to 'RE: yes'

bruised, but pleased l didn’t damage my lymphoedema arm as that would have caused me real problems. l have to take the draw profit and loss to the council tomorrow so l am typing a letter to complain about the steps as they haven’t replied to the boards request

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.52.182.40

Thread: 90566

Great result today by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 17:50:35, 130 views.

When did we last do the treble? Thought we would have been unlucky to go into the break behind, but it was a bad error from us that let them in. Fortunately we got back on terms, and then in the 2nd half we were very good, but even then they hit the bar and never gave up.

What was that massive argy bargy on the touchline all about? From where I was standing it looked nothing more than arguing who had a throw-in, or was there more to it than that?

Edited on 16/12/17 at 17:51:03
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.95.43

RE: Great result today by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 18:09:53, 99 views. In reply to 'Great result today'

Lino signalled throw in to us so Merris was holding on to the ball. I think the ref signalled throw to Ossett & so their player was hassling Merris for the ball but as Merris was just looking at the lino he held on to it. The Ossett guy got a bit stroppy & unfortunately Merris stropped back. I have a great deal of admiration for Dave but as captain he should have shown more restraint especially as he would not let it go & actually went back for more. Both yellow probably right.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

Thread: 90565

Snapshot by Cynic

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 17:47:36, 122 views.

Hard fought but comfortable win (I know it sounds like an oxymoron but fairly accurate I think, always felt we’d win, just as with many games you just ‘know’ the opposition will get a late winner/equaliser).

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.74.111.205

RE: Snapshot by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 17:52:41, 105 views. In reply to 'Snapshot'

Agree, with you, except for the fact that against Atherton I just “knew" that they would get a late equaliser, but it never happened, so occasionally even football surprises you!! ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.95.43

Thread: 90564

Today’s Results by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 17:08:32, 107 views.

EVOSTIK NORTH
Bamber Bridge 3-0 Radcliffe Borough
Brighouse Town 1-5 South Shields
Prescot Cables 2-2 Hyde Utd
Scarborough Athletic 3-1 Ossett Town

All other games in division postponed.

Boro stay in 5th place but make up ground on Hyde & Prescot. Also we are now 5 points clear of 6th place Droylsden.

Other results:

FA Trophy: Kidderminster 2-1 York City
FA Trophy: Wrexham 0-2 Harrogate Town
NCEL Prem: AFC Mansfield 3-0 Hall Road Rangers (5th league win on bounce for Rudy Funk’s team see them go 5 points clear at top of NCEL Prem)

North Ferriby, Whitby, Pickering and Bridlington games all postponed.

Edited on 16/12/17 at 17:49:26
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Thread: 90562

2nd half - Latest Scores in Evo-Stik North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:06:33, 57 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

BAMBER BRIDGE 3-0 Radcliffe Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:07:09, 36 views. In reply to '2nd half - Latest Scores in Evo-Stik North'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

BORO (Stimpson) 2-1 Ossett Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:07:33, 43 views. In reply to 'BAMBER BRIDGE 3-0 Radcliffe Boro'

Danny Stimpson nets at the far post from a Coulson corner

Edited on 16/12/17 at 16:11:44
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Attendance 834 by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:08:48, 47 views. In reply to 'BORO (Stimpson) 2-1 Ossett Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

PRESCOT CABLES (Dean) 1-0 Hyde Utd by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:09:34, 45 views. In reply to 'Attendance 834'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

BORO (Coulson) 3-1 Ossett Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:22:13, 52 views. In reply to 'PRESCOT CABLES (Dean) 1-0 Hyde Utd'

Header from a Max Wright cross.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

PRESCOT CABLES (Wynne) 2-0 Hyde Utd by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:26:42, 42 views. In reply to 'BORO (Coulson) 3-1 Ossett Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

BRIGHOUSE TOWN (Johnson, 66′) 1-2 South Shields by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:27:28, 39 views. In reply to 'PRESCOT CABLES (Wynne) 2-0 Hyde Utd'


Edited on 16/12/17 at 16:28:26
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

70′ SUB for Boro: Gooda ON for Cadman by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:30:43, 45 views. In reply to 'BRIGHOUSE TOWN (Johnson, 66′) 1-2 South Shields'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Prescot Cables 2-1 HYDE UTD (Pratt) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:32:12, 42 views. In reply to '70′ SUB for Boro: Gooda ON for Cadman'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Brighouse Town 1-3 SOUTH SHIELDS (Smith pen, 75) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:35:59, 44 views. In reply to 'Prescot Cables 2-1 HYDE UTD (Pratt)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Prescot Cables 2-2 HYDE UTD (Marie, 76′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:36:59, 45 views. In reply to 'Brighouse Town 1-3 SOUTH SHIELDS (Smith pen, 75)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Brighouse Town 1-4 SOUTH SHIELDS (Armstrong, 82′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:45:11, 42 views. In reply to 'Prescot Cables 2-2 HYDE UTD (Marie, 76′)'


Edited on 16/12/17 at 16:45:30
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Brighouse Town 1-5 SOUTH SHIELDS (Nicholson, 86′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:47:05, 39 views. In reply to 'Brighouse Town 1-4 SOUTH SHIELDS (Armstrong, 82′)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

87′ SUB for Boro: Sugden ON for Coulson by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:48:00, 43 views. In reply to 'Brighouse Town 1-5 SOUTH SHIELDS (Nicholson, 86′)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

89′ SUB for Boro: Beadle ON for Walshaw by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:48:48, 36 views. In reply to '87′ SUB for Boro: Sugden ON for Coulson'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

FT: Bamber Bridge 3-0 Radcliffe Borough by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:49:25, 40 views. In reply to '89′ SUB for Boro: Beadle ON for Walshaw'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

FT: Boro 3-1 Ossett Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:53:14, 44 views. In reply to 'FT: Bamber Bridge 3-0 Radcliffe Borough'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

FT: Brighouse Town 1-5 South Shields by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:54:07, 39 views. In reply to 'FT: Boro 3-1 Ossett Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

FT: Prescot Cables 2-2 Hyde Utd by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 16:54:47, 47 views. In reply to 'FT: Brighouse Town 1-5 South Shields'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Thread: 90561

Latest Scores in Evo-Stik North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:12:22, 47 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

BAMBER BRIDGE (Firth, o.g.) 1-0 Radcliffe Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:12:42, 42 views. In reply to 'Latest Scores in Evo-Stik North'


Edited on 16/12/17 at 15:13:13
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Brighouse 0-1 SOUTH SHIELDS (Finnigan, 23′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:24:50, 43 views. In reply to 'BAMBER BRIDGE (Firth, o.g.) 1-0 Radcliffe Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Boro 0-1 OSSETT TOWN (Hancock, 40′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:41:53, 46 views. In reply to 'Brighouse 0-1 SOUTH SHIELDS (Finnigan, 23′)'

Defensive cock-up.

Edited on 16/12/17 at 15:42:24
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

BORO (Wright) 1-1 Ossett Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:46:09, 37 views. In reply to 'Boro 0-1 OSSETT TOWN (Hancock, 40′)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

BAMBER BRIDGE (Wilson) 2-0 Radcliffe Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:47:27, 36 views. In reply to 'BORO (Wright) 1-1 Ossett Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Brighouse Town 0-2 SOUTH SHIELDS (Storey, 45+2) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:48:48, 35 views. In reply to 'BAMBER BRIDGE (Wilson) 2-0 Radcliffe Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

HT: Boro 1-1 Ossett Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:49:17, 37 views. In reply to 'Brighouse Town 0-2 SOUTH SHIELDS (Storey, 45+2)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

HT: Bamber Bridge 2-0 Radcliffe Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:49:55, 37 views. In reply to 'HT: Boro 1-1 Ossett Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

HT: Prescot Cables 0-0 Hyde Utd by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:50:43, 42 views. In reply to 'HT: Bamber Bridge 2-0 Radcliffe Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

HT: Brighouse Town 0-2 South Shields by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 15:51:24, 41 views. In reply to 'HT: Prescot Cables 0-0 Hyde Utd'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Thread: 90560

Cadman starts by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 14:48:31, 70 views.

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.178.62.125

Thread: 90559

Boro line-up today by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 14:48:00, 60 views.

1. Tom Taylor
2. Sam Hewitt
3. Dave Merris (C)
4. Nathan Valentine
5. Daniel Stimpson
6. James Knowles
7. James Cadman
8. Ross Daly
9. James Walshaw
10. Michael Coulson
11. Max Wright

Subs: Jamie Price, Tom Morgan, Bailey Gooda, Lewis Sugden, Jimmy Beadle.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Thread: 90558

Snainton by ka114 User: ka114

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 09:49:21, 125 views.

You’ve made your point now, please just give up your wicket at the earliest opportunity once play resumes!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.200.73.91

RE: Snainton by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 12:37:37, 93 views. In reply to 'Snainton '

It would explain my absence from games recently!

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.178.62.125

RE: RE: Snainton by ka114 User: ka114

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 14:01:37, 77 views. In reply to 'RE: Snainton '

Have to question where your true loyalties lie!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.219.62

Thread: 90557

Prediction comp Boro 2-0 Ossett Town Att: 888 by Battersea User: Battersea

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 22:42:53, 56 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.103.55.78

Thread: 90556

Lewis Sugden by Farsley Arkan User: Farsley Arkan

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 21:06:20, 130 views.

You’ve signed Young Sugden who is another former Celt. I have only seen him play once or twice as sub, so can’t tell you a lot about him. Looked a tidy player. He was q young (teen) then, and used as a squad player, but I think he was decent & rated by our then management. He went to America on a college scholarship for footy. If he’s fresh off the boat so to speak, he’ll be feeling the cold along the wintery Yorks coast. ;¬).

Good to hear about Murray- had he played in the N E Cts for SAfc or the Glue league? Just wondered as he seems to have played at all sorts of levels- 4th div with your faves the Yorkies, FCUM (presumably in the confs 2nd div or our current level), now Tad in your div.

Edited on 15/12/17 at 21:10:30
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.132.86.107

Thread: 90555

Cam Murray by Farsley Arkan User: Farsley Arkan

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 20:54:39, 121 views.

Yes we’ve picked up Cam Murray. I think he’s to be a replacement for ‘Scooby’ Marshall who’s had to retire this wk. He will be a great loss to us as an attacking/goalscoring threat. As much as anyone for us.
I’d be interested in your opinions on him as he lists SAfc as a former club. I don’t recall seeing him play. Is he a ‘in the hole ‘ player - his words. A goal threat?

BTW the reply thing is playing up again so I had to start this thread

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.132.86.107

right basically he’s a very good player by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 20:57:15, 123 views. In reply to 'Cam Murray'

who had two spells with us in recent seasons. You’ll enjoy him, but more important for us is him leaving Taddy and going to a team not in our division (phew!) He’ll grab a few goals from midfield

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.172

RE: Cameron Murray by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 22:17:51, 112 views. In reply to 'right basically he’s a very good player '

He is a very technical and skilled player and wish we still had him. On the negative side in his later times with us he seemed to disappear up his own backside too often and turn into trouble. He’s fairly quick but a bit lightweight and small but that does not always have to be a bad thing. I hope he does well for you.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

Thread: 90554

Cameron Murray by boroboy1950 User: boroboy1950

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 19:10:22, 113 views.

I see Cam Murray has now moved from Taddy to Farsley!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.186.43.113

Thread: 90553

New loan signing by club.comms User: club.comms

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 14:14:16, 135 views.

Central defender Bailey Gooda from Harrogate Town

http://scarboroughathletic.com/news/2017-12-15/bailey-gooda-joins-on-one-month-loan

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.196.128

Looks like a gooda signing by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 14:38:50, 115 views. In reply to 'New loan signing'

I’ll get my coat

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.69.144.208

Thread: 90552

Leigh RMI 0-2 Scarborough (8th March 2003) by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 17:05:13, 121 views.

I’ve just found a VHS recording of the full match from the Conference match between Leigh RMI and Boro from March 2003. I have just bought a VHS-DVD-PC conversion kit, so will upload the full thing to YouTube (or at least highlights) once it’s done.

It amazes me to this day that the game was on. It rained all the way to Atherton (hey, that rings a bell!) where me and my dad changed on to a bus to Leigh’s Hilton Park ground. A few hundred rattled around inside the cavernous rugby ground in horrendous conditions. Honestly, wait until you see the pitch. Standing water, mud everywhere, the ball sticking completely still when passed. It shouldn’t have been played, yet it was.

Boro’s team that day:

Woods, Shepherd, Holdsworth, Sillah, Hotte, Taylor, Kerr, Stoker, Brassart, Pounder, Cohen.
Subs: Walker, Connell, Fatokun, Dempsey.

Goals on 24 and 45 minutes from Gary Cohen and Cleveland Taylor respectively.

This was the season where we looked destined for a playoff spot on Christmas day, but 6 consecutive defeats starting in January meant that Slade handed his resignation in, then didn’t, then did, then didn’t etc. etc. We eventually finished 7th.

Edited on 14/12/17 at 17:08:07
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

RE: Leigh RMI 0-2 Scarborough (8th March 2003) by rawdonseadog User: rawdonseadog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 20:37:31, 97 views. In reply to 'Leigh RMI 0-2 Scarborough (8th March 2003)'

Was there that day and remember it well, will look forward to the highlights!

Scarborough FC RIP 1879-2007

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.93.182.139

Leigh v boro by Tim Lazenby

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 10:55:46, 62 views. In reply to 'Leigh RMI 0-2 Scarborough (8th March 2003)'

I remember just arriving to the ground and been greeted by two local stewards who had just goning to garden centre to get forks for doing the ground , we went to the local establishment oppersite the ground , to be told by one local football no welcome here as it’s a rugby town , after a few more beers the rugby fan was broadcasting to all Boro supporters that he could make one phone call and he could get around 2000 fans down to give us a good beating , great banter that day !

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 46.231.14.234

RE: Leigh v boro by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 11:06:29, 68 views. In reply to 'Leigh v boro'

Leigh were quite the club. They actually finished 5th in the Conference the season before playoffs were introduced. Can you imagine if they’d gone up to the Football League?

It used to be a running joke that they made their attendances up, because every week it’d be 201, 301, 201, 401, 201 etc. They were so poorly supported. On each occasion I saw them at Boro, they brought six fans. We segregated and opened the Edgehill Road stand for six fans. No wonder we went bust!

Edited on 15/12/17 at 11:07:02
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Table in question by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 11:18:37, 97 views. In reply to 'RE: Leigh v boro'

(it was in fact 2 seasons before play-offs) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000–01_Football_Conference#Final_league_table

Interesting that from that table, Rushden & Diamonds, Leigh, Telford, Chester, Boro, Hereford, Nuneaton, and I think Kettering, have all folded/liquidated/reformed since then. I may even have missed a couple

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.167

VIDEO OF TWO GOALS HERE by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 17:43:37, 89 views. In reply to 'Table in question'

Sorry for the abysmal quality. You have to remember this was amateur video recording on VHS from 2003. None of that fancy HD stuff back then.

YouTube link to goals

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Thread: 90551

South Shields away fixture (Bank Hoilday Monday 1/1/18) by Tim Lazenby

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 13:54:50, 120 views.

Just wounded if there has there been any mention regarding our New Year’s Day fixture being an all ticket game ?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 46.231.14.234

Their ground holds 3,500, and their highest so far is 1,776. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 14:07:11, 112 views. In reply to 'South Shields away fixture (Bank Hoilday Monday 1/1/18)'

Even against York and Hartlepool in the FA Cup, they got 2,806 and 2,887, well below capacity.

I think we’ll be fine. 2,000+ perhaps, but can’t see the need to be all ticket.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

RE: Their ground holds 3,500, and their highest so far is 1,776. by Terry Hope

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 20:16:10, 104 views. In reply to 'Their ground holds 3,500, and their highest so far is 1,776.'

What s**t fans; so inconsiderate of their potential

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

Thread: 90550

Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 07:37:19, 59 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Athletico seadog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 07:50:46, 56 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 2 - 2 Ossett Town
Att 853

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.132.91.230

RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by thirskseadogs User: thirskseadogs

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 16:43:05, 27 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

boro 3/2 ossett att 909

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 143.159.10.24

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Zante Seadog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 08:00:32, 60 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Seadogs 2 - 1 Ossett att 900

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.16.82.236

Re Prediction Competition by Merseydog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 08:59:37, 46 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 2-1 Ossett Att 850

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.2.192.109

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 09:07:09, 48 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 2-1 Ossett

Attendance 874 (6 of whom moan vocally at the players and management)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.91.133

RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 09:23:04, 48 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 3-1 Ossett Town
Attendance: 856

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Boro 2-2 Ossett Town Att: 1,088 by MAlcD

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 10:14:07, 33 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 195.225.189.243

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Dunno

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 11:23:52, 35 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 7 - 0 Ossett Town

Att - 1100.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.13.151.87

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Shadowseadog User: Shadowseadog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 11:40:47, 37 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 2-1 Ossett

Att- 957

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.214.228.220

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 12:25:40, 40 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

this is the good Ossett isnt it?

Boro 2-1
Att 564

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.254.104.28

sa 0-1 ot (804) nt by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 12:59:23, 40 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'


www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.181.227.198

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 13:21:52, 37 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 2-0 Ossett Town, attendance 897

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile", except for Che.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Tim Lazenby

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 13:47:52, 32 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

68

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 46.231.14.234

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Boro 1 v Ossett 0 Att: 798

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 13:48:35, 37 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.185.168

RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 13:49:30, 44 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 2-1 Ossett Town

Att: 902

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Prediction competition by Tim Lazenby

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 13:49:34, 45 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 3 v Ossett T 1

Crowd 775

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 46.231.14.234

RE: Prediction competition by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 15:21:46, 41 views. In reply to 'Prediction competition '

Boro 1-0
Gate: 865

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.79.222.88

prediction by dazaster

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 16:27:27, 51 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

boro 3 ossett 1 att 957

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 5.68.19.171

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by The Red Baron User: The Red Baron

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 20:08:14, 51 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 2 v Ossett T 0

Crowd 934

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.166.40.222

Prediction competition by China seadog

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 09:01:14, 31 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 1-0

Attendance 745

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.205.252.168

prediction by villager

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 16:25:17, 31 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 2 Osset Town 1
attendance 802

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.227.170.217

Prediction competition by Viking Seadog

Posted: 15/12/2017 at 18:24:36, 30 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Scarborough Athletic 3 - 0 Ossett Town
Attendance: 923

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 77.16.71.216

RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Gavin Avison User: Gavin Avison

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 08:01:23, 23 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 3 1 ossett
attendance 919

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 148.252.129.150

RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by rawdonseadog User: rawdonseadog

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 11:00:15, 19 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Boro 2 Ossett 1
Att 922

Scarborough FC RIP 1879-2007

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 148.252.128.241

re prediction competition by kasey

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 11:55:48, 27 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

Scarborough 1 Ossett 0
att 888

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.140.118

RE: re prediction competition by Che User: Che

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 12:27:28, 17 views. In reply to 're prediction competition'

801

Boro 2-1

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.205.192.103

Boro 2-1 Ossett att: 903 by Stuntpele

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 12:38:13, 16 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.205.192.215

prediction by shayne appleyard

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 13:03:46, 18 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H)'

boro 2 v 0 ossett
att 918

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.218.146.63

RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Ossett Town (H) by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 14:25:38, 15 views. In reply to 'prediction'

Boro 2-0
Att: 876

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

Thread: 90548

Well done to all the winner of the Xmas Draw by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 13/12/2017 at 22:34:43, 103 views.

The list will be published in the coming days no doubt.

Spoiler: like Shaggy, it wasn’t me.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.157

Thread: 90547

My take on kittrick interview by Leeds seadog 27

Posted: 13/12/2017 at 20:22:24, 153 views.

I wasn’t at the game last night but my take on the kittrick interview is simple. We have won the last two games, and the players are part time and have jobs away from boro so imho unless we are losing then I don’t think they deserve abuse.. If that has happened at the game last night? I think we all need to appreciate that these lads are not full time players, yes they get some money but playing for boro will be for the love of the game. Things get said during games but imo I think it would be a shame if this sort of thing drove players or kittrick away

Up the boro!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.26.23.86

Interview by I

Posted: 13/12/2017 at 21:43:55, 167 views. In reply to 'My take on kittrick interview'

When can we hear this interview?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.236.97

RE: Interview by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 13/12/2017 at 22:36:12, 143 views. In reply to 'Interview '

https://twitter.com/SN_Sport/status/940722130949431296

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.157

Interview by I

Posted: 13/12/2017 at 23:31:19, 135 views. In reply to 'Interview '

Listerned to interview kitkat better players have left because you wont play them and your not happy the fans pay your large wage and you attack them

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.236.97

RE: Interview by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 19:03:17, 97 views. In reply to 'Interview '

Was expecting SK to be much more forthright than he was having seen that comment. I’d expect him to stick up for his players, that’s fair enough. The only minor issue I have was that he was indicating that this was a long-standing issue - that hasn’t been my experience - and I think he vast, vast majority of us are resolute in getting behind the team and individual players. Personally, I distance myself from any ‘fan’ having a go at individual players, so I wouldn’t consider myself to be the target of his comments or that it is aimed at “the fans" as a whole. In fact (good ’stream of consciousness’ post, this one!) I’d endorse those views and condemn anyone sticking the boot in - particularly with young players.

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile", except for Che.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: Interview by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 14/12/2017 at 22:53:04, 83 views. In reply to 'RE: Interview '

I was sat in the main stand & don’t recall any slagging off of players in particular apart from a few moans of frustration occasionally. The people around me were saying the young midfielder looked a decent prospect especially as it was his first game for a while I guess. The only shouting that I know of & confess to was when JJ had been injured and waiting to come back on. The ref signalled him FOUR times to come on before he did. We were just shouting for him to get back on. Apart from that - well I didn’t hear anything bad. I do feel frustrated at times but try to bottle it & would never disrespect a player / management or official.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.