Newest Message: RE: we didn’t really deserve a point by Armchairdog on 18/11/2017, 17:25:37 - View Thread

88

Thread: 90022

Some people are on the pitch….. by Stuart Hamill’s dodgy haircut

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 18:18:01, 175 views.

Looks like the knuckle draggers were in attendance today, 3 idiots going on the pitch when we cequalised. 1 having a go at the ref and other 2 confronting the away keeper. Club don’t really need this kind of numpty attending and will probably get fined by the FA.

Well done lads, bravo

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.247.165

Ref by Ccccdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 18:29:28, 136 views. In reply to 'Some people are on the pitch…..'

I don’t condone people on the pitch whatsoever…! But I think between the amount of time wasting on those goal kicks and the lack of discipline from the ref they both created the inevitable on themselves! But we really don’t want people on the pitch at all !

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.194.226

RE: Ref by Matt

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 18:34:04, 129 views. In reply to 'Ref'

Those 3 going on the pitch completely embarrassed themselves. Hopefully the excellent highlights we get this season will mean we can identify and ban these morons.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 148.252.129.161

RE: Some people are on the pitch….. by Hatman

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 19:02:29, 132 views. In reply to 'Some people are on the pitch…..'

Plus embarrassing abuse by a “well known" boro fan.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.149.185.64

RE: RE: Some people are on the pitch….. by Belfast Seadog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 20:02:18, 115 views. In reply to 'RE: Some people are on the pitch…..'

Today was such a bad performance by the officials I can forgive a few fans losing their cool. Going for the glass half full approach I thought the atmosphere at the end was amazing.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.235.202

RE: RE: RE: Some people are on the pitch….. by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 20:07:47, 137 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Some people are on the pitch…..'

Shouldn’t be running on the pitch whatever the circumstances. Even in “harmless" situations, like goal celebrations. At South Shields today the scorer of their winning goal against York City, Gavin Cogdon, was mobbed by so many fans running onto the pitch that he was injured and unable to finish the game. So there is never really an excuse for running on the pitch, certainly not whilst the game is still going on.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Thread: 90020

Dave M by Cynic

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:31:43, 157 views.

Any news on Merris?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.100.225.238

RE: Dave M by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:35:53, 148 views. In reply to 'Dave M'

Some Twitter reports said he was taken to hospital for check up because he was temporarily knocked out cold. Hopefully he’ll be fit for the replay on Tuesday night.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

RE: RE: Dave M by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:48:06, 130 views. In reply to 'RE: Dave M'

It would be great if he was, I feared when he was stretchered off he might be out for some time.

I also hope Matty Turnbull can recover in time for the replay ideally, as I felt we looked unusually shaky at the back today, especially in the first half. He always brings a reassuring presence to the defence.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.95.179

Thread: 90019

When is the replay n/t by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:18:31, 44 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.135.250

Tuesday n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:26:13, 40 views. In reply to 'When is the replay n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Thread: 90018

Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:59:36, 81 views.

Atherton Colleries 1-1 Glossop North End
Brighouse Town 2-2 Colwyn Bay
Clitheroe 1-1 Mossley
Colne 1-1 Trafford
Droylsden 2-2 Tadcaster
Goole 3-3 Skelmersdale
Kendal Town 2-3 Radcliffe Borough
Prescott Cables 1-1 Ossett Albion
Ramsbottom Utd 0-1 Bamber Bridge

Edited on 30/09/17 at 17:02:32
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Boro drop to 4th place after today by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:05:31, 67 views. In reply to 'Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North'

as Bamber Bridge and Glossop move up to 2nd and 3rd respectively.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

but we’re in the hat for Monday’s FA Cup draw! by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:06:36, 71 views. In reply to 'Boro drop to 4th place after today'

…..replay on Tuesday night.

Edited on 30/09/17 at 17:06:53
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

And 1 and 2 games in hand of them respectively by Norwich-Seadog User: Norwich-Seadog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:29:26, 44 views. In reply to 'Boro drop to 4th place after today'

and only 1 point behind

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.223.221.133

all those draws by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:34:56, 70 views. In reply to 'Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North'

love it.

Biggest downer therefore wasn’t our result or any of their results, but the Merris injury

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.95.179

RE: all those draws by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:49:08, 50 views. In reply to 'all those draws'

SK just been interviewed on Radio York. He thought our keeper should be MOTM. He also thought we were 2nd best today and were outplayed all over the pitch but he was optimistic about our chances in the replay but was quite critical of one player (I assume Billy Logan?) who will still be on holiday and therefore unavailable again for the replay.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

RE: RE: all those draws by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:52:40, 59 views. In reply to 'RE: all those draws'

Yeah Tommy was outstanding today. I felt for him with the penalty cos he did so well to save it and then quickly palm away the rebound but could do nothing with the 2nd rebound. Both their goals came from close range finishes after we failed to clear our lines.

For me a draw was a fair result and the replay could obviously go either way. Yes, it’s a long trek for a midweek game but you only have to look at the Cambridge City game in the Trophy.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.95.179

Thread: 90017

Latest: Brighouse 2-1 COLWYN BAY by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:13:21, 23 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: 52′ SUB for BORO Sinclair OFF Osborne ON by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:16:07, 22 views. In reply to 'Latest: Brighouse 2-1 COLWYN BAY'


Edited on 30/09/17 at 16:17:25
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: COLNE (Khan) 1-0 Trafford by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:18:07, 24 views. In reply to 'Latest: 52′ SUB for BORO Sinclair OFF Osborne ON'


Edited on 30/09/17 at 16:23:31
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: Droylsden 1-2 TADCASTER (T. Corner) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:19:29, 21 views. In reply to 'Latest: COLNE (Khan) 1-0 Trafford'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: Atherton Colleries 0-1 GLOSSOP NE by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:27:12, 15 views. In reply to 'Latest: Droylsden 1-2 TADCASTER (T. Corner)'

Meppen-Walter

Edited on 30/09/17 at 16:28:48
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: Clitheroe 0-1 MOSSLEY by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:28:14, 17 views. In reply to 'Latest: Atherton Colleries 0-1 GLOSSOP NE'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: Colne 1-1 TRAFFORD (Corrigan) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:33:19, 18 views. In reply to 'Latest: Clitheroe 0-1 MOSSLEY'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: South Shields 2-1 YORK CITY (Newton, 76′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:36:06, 16 views. In reply to 'Latest: Colne 1-1 TRAFFORD (Corrigan)'


Edited on 30/09/17 at 16:37:06
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: South Shields 2-2 YORK CITY (Jon Parkin, 78) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:37:34, 24 views. In reply to 'Latest: South Shields 2-1 YORK CITY (Newton, 76′)'


Edited on 30/09/17 at 16:37:47
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: ATHERTON COLLERIES 1-1 Glossop North End by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:43:00, 19 views. In reply to 'Latest: South Shields 2-2 YORK CITY (Jon Parkin, 78)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

76 mins gone, still Boro 1-2 Stratford by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:43:46, 27 views. In reply to 'Latest: ATHERTON COLLERIES 1-1 Glossop North End'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: Ramsbottom Utd 0-1 BAMBER BRIDGE by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:45:03, 22 views. In reply to '76 mins gone, still Boro 1-2 Stratford'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: Brighouse 2-2 COLWYN BAY by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:46:36, 23 views. In reply to 'Latest: Ramsbottom Utd 0-1 BAMBER BRIDGE'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: DROYLSDEN 2-2 Tadcaster by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:49:30, 14 views. In reply to 'Latest: Brighouse 2-2 COLWYN BAY'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: SOUTH SHIELDS 3-2 York City by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:51:30, 30 views. In reply to 'Latest: DROYLSDEN 2-2 Tadcaster'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

SUB 88 - Cadman on for Boro, Johnson off by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:54:47, 21 views. In reply to 'Latest: SOUTH SHIELDS 3-2 York City'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

FT: South Shields 3 York City 2 by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:57:01, 35 views. In reply to 'SUB 88 - Cadman on for Boro, Johnson off '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: BORO (Osbourne) 2-2 Stratford by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 16:58:08, 50 views. In reply to 'FT: South Shields 3 York City 2'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Full-Time: Boro 2-2 Stratford by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:00:30, 54 views. In reply to 'Latest: BORO (Osbourne) 2-2 Stratford'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Thread: 90016

Half-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:52:11, 30 views.

Atherton Colleries 0-0 Glossop North End
Brighouse Town 1-0 Colwyn Bay
Clitheroe 0-0 Mossley
Colne 0-0 Trafford
Droylsden 0-1 Tadcaster
Goole 2-1 Skelmersdale
Kendal Town 0-3 Radcliffe Borough
Prescott Cables 1-1 Ossett Albion
Ramsbottom Utd 0-0 Bamber Bridge

Edited on 30/09/17 at 15:56:40
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Thread: 90015

Boro line-up today by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 14:39:13, 56 views.

Taylor, Johnson, Merris, Valentine, Thirkell, Hewitt, Daly, Dean, Sinclair, Coulson, Wright.

Subs: Cadman, Morgan, Binns, Osbourne, Dempsey, Nelthorpe, Price.

Note: Nathan Curtis is cup-tied, Turnbull is ill, Beadle still injured and Logan “unavailable".

Edited on 30/09/17 at 14:40:17
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: Boro 0-1 STRATFORD TOWN by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:08:23, 32 views. In reply to 'Boro line-up today'

Stephens from close range, woeful Boro defending from a corner.

Edited on 30/09/17 at 15:12:43
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: SOUTH SHIELDS (Finnigan, pen) 1-0 York City by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:12:05, 23 views. In reply to 'Latest: Boro 0-1 STRATFORD TOWN'

Howler from York goalie to concede a penalty and Carl Finigan slots home

Edited on 30/09/17 at 15:14:54
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: BORO (Coulson) 1-1 Stratford Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:19:54, 40 views. In reply to 'Latest: SOUTH SHIELDS (Finnigan, pen) 1-0 York City'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: Boro 1-2 STRATFORD TOWN (Summerfield) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:23:51, 31 views. In reply to 'Latest: BORO (Coulson) 1-1 Stratford Town'

Slots home from rebound of penalty miss.
Thirkell booked for foul that gave penalty away.

Edited on 30/09/17 at 15:24:35
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: Droylsden 0-1 TADCASTER (T. Corner) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:31:11, 20 views. In reply to 'Latest: Boro 1-2 STRATFORD TOWN (Summerfield)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: SOUTH SHIELDS (J Arca) 2-0 York City by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:38:04, 21 views. In reply to 'Latest: Droylsden 0-1 TADCASTER (T. Corner)'


Edited on 30/09/17 at 15:39:27
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: Kendal 0-3 RADCLIFFE by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:40:50, 17 views. In reply to 'Latest: SOUTH SHIELDS (J Arca) 2-0 York City'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Latest: BRIGHOUSE (Worral) 1-0 Colwyn Bay by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:44:23, 16 views. In reply to 'Latest: Kendal 0-3 RADCLIFFE '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Sub for Boro: Merris OFF, Nelthorpe ON by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:46:50, 29 views. In reply to 'Latest: BRIGHOUSE (Worral) 1-0 Colwyn Bay'

Head injury for Merris

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

HT: South Shields 2-0 York City (Att 2,806) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:50:42, 23 views. In reply to 'Sub for Boro: Merris OFF, Nelthorpe ON'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

HT: Boro 1-2 Stratford Town (Att 1,180) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 15:53:02, 31 views. In reply to 'HT: South Shields 2-0 York City (Att 2,806)'


Edited on 30/09/17 at 15:54:13
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

Thread: 90014

No Turnbull today by Southern dog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 14:29:08, 82 views.

Is he injured?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.40.249.207

RE: No Turnbull today by Stockton Seadog User: Stockton Seadog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 14:52:15, 87 views. In reply to 'No Turnbull today'

He’s ill

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.205.192.107

Flu apparently n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 17:33:52, 52 views. In reply to 'RE: No Turnbull today'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.95.179

Thread: 90013

Up 4 the cup by seadog tom

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 13:36:12, 48 views.

Good luck BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.226.180.55

Thread: 90011

Why are the cup rounds earlier these days? by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 10:44:04, 84 views.

11 years ago today we played Lancaster in the 2nd qualifying round. So we’re basically a whole round ahead despite being on the same date!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.248.52

RE: Why are the cup rounds earlier these days? by che..

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 11:18:08, 76 views. In reply to 'Why are the cup rounds earlier these days?'

…World Cup year probably.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 37.72.118.12

hmmm… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 11:54:02, 65 views. In reply to 'RE: Why are the cup rounds earlier these days?'

but the 3rd round is still the first Saturday in January which isn’t New year’s day, as it has always been. So they just seem to be putting the earlier rounds earlier, not the rounds that would affect when they could finish the season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.248.52

Thread: 90010

Matchday programme question by Up the boro

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 22:03:43, 120 views.

Is there a reason why attendances are missing from the fixtures page? I always like to see what the recent crowds have been like and what the reverse fixture attendance was, that and i would have thought in our first year back they would be a welcome addition to the page

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.218.81.104

Noted. I’m sure it’s do-able by club.comms User: club.comms

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 23:14:28, 88 views. In reply to 'Matchday programme question'

Thanks for the feedback

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.146.244.138

RE: Noted. I’m sure it’s do-able by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 14:23:33, 35 views. In reply to 'Noted. I’m sure it’s do-able'

And goalscorers…..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.234.190

Thread: 90009

From BBC Radio York by club.comms User: club.comms

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 21:14:01, 107 views.

Steve Kittrick looks ahead to the game tomorrow

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05hh5bw

BBC Commentator Ivan Ash will be back at the Flamingo Land Stadium to cover the game, providing pre-match, half-time and full-time reports and reaction following the game.

Please note there will be no live match commentary on Yorkshire Coast Radio Extra tomorrow

Edited by admin on 29/09/17 at 21:33:28
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.146.244.138

Thread: 90008

Chairman Trevor Bull’s message to the fans ahead of tomorrow by club.comms User: club.comms

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 20:58:12, 108 views.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/scarboroughathletic/posts/10154714089850443

Twitter: https://twitter.com/SAFC_TV/status/913816373809344513

Edited by admin on 29/09/17 at 21:28:28
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.146.244.138

Thread: 90007

NPL 50th Anniversary - Top 100 Players of the NPL50 by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 20:04:55, 90 views.

QUOTE

As part of the 50th Anniversary of the Northern Premier League, we are running a campaign to decide the Top 100 players of action from our beginnings in 1968 to today. This is the Nominations poll for players to be included in the voting.

UNQUOTE

I reckon many of our 4 x FA Trophy Finalists (3 x winners) deserve a nomination

https://pollmill.com/f/npl-50th-anniversary-3cqke2a/answers/new.fullpage

www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.180.175.214

Thread: 90006

Pickering Town, promotion, and their ground by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 18:20:09, 142 views.

Does anyone know whether Pickering would be allowed in the Evo-Stik with their three-sided ground? The NCEL are good to them, and allow them to play their first month of fixtures away from home, but unsure whether the Evo-Stik would look as kindly on temporary fencing and moving fixtures around?

Hope they do it. If we don’t go up (booooo), it’d be great to have them in the league. Two good crowds.

If the answer is no to the ground question incidentally, I wonder if we may be sharing our ground from next season?! Stranger things have happened!

Edited on 29/09/17 at 18:20:37
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

They’ve been given the ok for promotion on at least the … by Norwich-Seadog User: Norwich-Seadog

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 20:45:00, 98 views. In reply to 'Pickering Town, promotion, and their ground'

last 3 seasons

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.223.221.133

Thread: 90005

Prediction comp BORO 3-2 STRATFORD Att 1094 by Battersea User: Battersea

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 17:57:23, 25 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.239.114.253

Thread: 90004

Accounts concerns by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 11:11:16, 191 views.

Received my copy of the accounts today?
Correct me if I am wrong but the way I read it we would have lost £70k last season if we hadn’t been left money in someone’s will?
Let’s hope the new board have got finances back under control and the current “windfalls" have been “put away for a rainy day"

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.135.250

My reading of it was… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 11:27:23, 161 views. In reply to 'Accounts concerns'

that the club knew about it in advance of (or very early in) the season and so were able to budget accordingly, as opposed to getting lucky with a late season windfall.

I also suspect it is why the club stated this season’s playing budget would be the same/similar to last season’s, despite the certain increase in attendances/sponsorship etc that coming home would provide.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.88.68

RE: My reading of it was… by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 13:10:28, 138 views. In reply to 'My reading of it was…'

I hope you are right and we have learned lessons from the past and are now building up reserves from the current windfalls

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.135.250

RE: RE: My reading of it was… by Cynic

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 13:21:52, 133 views. In reply to 'RE: My reading of it was…'

Are they windfalls ( cup run apart)? Do we have a break even figure for crowds this season?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 193.240.172.42

MEMBERS PLEASE REMEMBER….. by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 13:21:23, 142 views. In reply to 'Accounts concerns'

The Financial Report is not in the public domain but has been issued solely to members of the Society in advance of the AGM.
As a member you have agreed to “respect commercial confidentiality in relation to business decisions of the Club".
Posting specifics from the report on here would probably be a breach of this agreement and the Society Rules.

The place for any discussion on the specifics is probably the AGM / Members Forum rather than here.

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.202.218.235

RE: MEMBERS PLEASE REMEMBER….. by Zante Seadog

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 13:42:34, 132 views. In reply to 'MEMBERS PLEASE REMEMBER…..'

By saying society members, does this include joint owners or is this something completely different?
If not, how do I become a society member? And what does that actually mean?
Thanks in advance
TT

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.16.82.236

same thing - joint owners n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 13:45:22, 87 views. In reply to 'RE: MEMBERS PLEASE REMEMBER…..'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.88.68

Same thing….. by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 13:48:02, 102 views. In reply to 'RE: MEMBERS PLEASE REMEMBER…..'

…strictly speaking we are Society Members rather than joint owners.

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.202.218.235

RE: Same thing….. by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 13:50:31, 98 views. In reply to 'Same thing…..'

Strictly speaking we’re both surely?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.88.68

I am being pedantic and dull…. by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 14:08:08, 122 views. In reply to 'RE: Same thing…..'

…..and you’re right when you say it amounts to the same thing.

I say “strictly speaking" because the language used in the Society Rules refers to “Member" rather than joint owner, to the extent that “Member" is included in the list of defined terms.

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.202.218.235

RE: I am being pedantic and dull…. by Zante Seadog

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 14:32:58, 111 views. In reply to 'I am being pedantic and dull….'

Cool, thanks for info.
Fingers crossed for another win tomorrow!!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.16.82.236

Financial Report etc by Jason Bourne User: Jason Bourne

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 19:39:50, 144 views. In reply to 'RE: I am being pedantic and dull….'

Apologies for the delay.

My interpretation.

Whilst I accept Mrs Trellis’s point regarding Commercial confidentiality and breach of Society Rules, in my opinion, that has been trotted out for a number of years now, to both stifle debate on the subject of the Club’s finances, and cover a multitude of sins. With c. 10% of the present members/owners turning out to the AGM, many will not have the opportunity to ask any relevant questions directly Mrs T. Previous submissions through the EMG have been somewhat brushed aside. I’ll try not to fall foul of ‘the rules’ here though.

No Old Seadog, we wouldn’t have lost that amount of money, because we knew early on about the legacy. In anticipation of those funds being released it would appear that we increased the budget in order to fund a promotion push. We wouldn’t have done that if we hadn’t known those funds were coming.

HOWEVER - those funds are included in the turnover figure on the back of the Accounting policies now being used - ‘turnover is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable’. They hadn’t been received as at 31st May (see Debtors as we are still ‘owed’ that money) and in fact still haven’t been received. Furthermore, ’someone’ has bridged the gap for those funds (see Creditors) by lending us that money until it is received - thank you whoever that was!

So in theory, when those funds are received, they will go to repay whoever bridged the gap. To summarise that, there isn’t any money to bolter the reserves. What’s more, to support the budget - and you can see the percentage increases in player wages and management costs for yourself - we’ve also used those ‘buy a brick’ monies.

Things have improved though, with many income streams well in front of budget projections - although I can’t speak totally for any crowd / gate receipt estimates. Lucrative friendlies have generated much needed cash. Whereas previously the financials weren’t good and we had little idea of what we were doing / where we were going, I now have great confidence that finances are under control. CONTROL being the key word.

The new Board, whatever the make up of that, need to acknowledge errors of the past and then reassure us for the future. No more than that.

They deserve to start with a clean slate.

Good luck to everyone involved with the club for tomorrow.

Regards.

Jason

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 78.149.170.242

It it satisfactory to Jason, I’m happy with that! N/t by Slightly concerned seadog

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 11:48:59, 50 views. In reply to 'Financial Report etc'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.210.101.19

Thread: 90002

Prediction 30/09/17 by China seadog

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 14:44:52, 54 views.

Boro 2-0
Attendance: 1239

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.195.243.104

Thread: 90001

Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 14:03:07, 80 views.

Scores and predictions in this thread please where possible.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 14:06:08, 59 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro 2-2 Stratford

Attendance 1017

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.92.157

Boro 2-1 Stratford, Att 1042 nt by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 14:07:57, 50 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'


Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile."

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 152.71.38.192

RE: Boro 2-1 Stratford, Att 1042 nt by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 14:08:19, 51 views. In reply to 'Boro 2-1 Stratford, Att 1042 nt'

Boro 1-0 Stratford

Att: 1,045

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by Dunno

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 14:15:42, 51 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro 4 - 1 Stratford

Att - 1200

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.194.211

RE: RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by Gavin Avison User: Gavin Avison

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 16:48:52, 42 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro 3 1 Stratford
attendance 1121

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.220.252.185

RE: RE: RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by thirskseadogs User: thirskseadogs

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 10:39:40, 37 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

boro 2/0 stratford att 1145

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 143.159.10.27

RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by Stockton Seadog User: Stockton Seadog

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 16:56:56, 41 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Scarborough 4 - 1 Stratford
Attendance 1400

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.0.175.116

RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by The Red Baron User: The Red Baron

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 17:30:54, 49 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

2-2 924

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.196.10

RE: RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 19:35:34, 44 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro 3-1 Stratford
Attendance: 1,175

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.24.149.176

RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by ZanteSeadog

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 19:57:40, 39 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro 2 - 1 Stratford att 1234

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.16.82.236

RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by Athletico seadog

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 20:03:26, 43 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro 2-2 Stratford
Att 1010

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.190.125.138

prediction by dazaster

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 20:20:37, 52 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

boro 3 stratford 1
att 1172

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.223.231.188

Prediction by savvyshayne User: savvyshayne

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 20:38:13, 41 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro 2 v 0 Stratford
Att 1135

S appleyard

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.217.43.241

Prediction competition by Viking Seadog

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 21:24:29, 41 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Scarborough Athletic 3 - 0 Stratford Town
Attendance: 1097

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 77.16.36.151

Boro 1 Stratford 0 Att: 1,116 by filey1

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 21:59:59, 37 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.122.8.41

RE: Boro 1 Stratford 0 Att: 1,116 by rawdonseadog User: rawdonseadog

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 23:20:36, 42 views. In reply to 'Boro 1 Stratford 0 Att: 1,116'

Boro 4 - 1 Stratford
Att 1201

Scarborough FC RIP 1879-2007

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.69.144.17

RE: RE: Boro 1 Stratford 0 Att: 1,116 by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 06:19:46, 32 views. In reply to 'RE: Boro 1 Stratford 0 Att: 1,116'

Boro 2-0
Gate: 1,111

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.79.222.87

Preduction by Fendog

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 07:38:36, 44 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro…. 5
Stratford.. 2

Att…1146

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.193.76

Boro 2 - 1 att: 1088 n/t by MAlcD

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 08:43:08, 32 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 195.225.189.243

RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 10:15:57, 39 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro 2-3

1154

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.254.104.28

Up the Town by GREG

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 10:27:28, 56 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Scarboro 1-5 Stratford

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 212.250.101.178

SA 0-0 ST (1009) NT by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 10:29:26, 37 views. In reply to 'Up the Town'


www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.180.175.214

RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 16:21:48, 39 views. In reply to 'SA 0-0 ST (1009) NT '

Boro 3-1 Strat
Att 1110

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.150.171.183

RE: Prediction Competition by Merseydog

Posted: 29/9/2017 at 17:01:34, 36 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro 3-1 Att 1300

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.120.114.20

Boro 1-0 Stratford att 1165 by Stuntpele

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 08:11:34, 24 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.40.57.157

RE: Boro 1-0 Stratford att 1165 by Che..

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 08:48:00, 28 views. In reply to 'Boro 1-0 Stratford att 1165'

Boro 2-2 Stratford
Att. 1054

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.52.201.255

RE: Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep) by sick boy User: sick boy

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 09:28:15, 35 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Boro 2-2 Stratford att 1007

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.217.164.36

re prediction competition by kasey

Posted: 30/9/2017 at 13:22:55, 23 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: STRATFORD TOWN (30 Sep)'

Scarborough 2 Stratford 1
att

990

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 88.104.3.122

Thread: 90000

Prediction Competition: LATEST TABLE (28/9) by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 14:01:46, 66 views.

Oh Stuntpele, you are top, but you could have been six points clear. You predicted 903 for the crowd… one out!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

If only… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 28/9/2017 at 14:05:43, 49 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: LATEST TABLE (28/9)'

he hadn’t gone himself ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.92.157
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.