Newest Message: Going on in 15 mins n/t by Nick Finch on 19/11/2017, 11:45:28 - View Thread


Thread: 90401

Logan on Fbook by AytonSAFC User: AytonSAFC

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 18:26:05, 206 views.

Billy Logan stating he’s unhappy with the comments kittrick made about him wanting to be an impact sub. Stated he wants to play every minute of every game.

I continue to feel that kittrick deserves to continue managing….. a solid start to the season with a great cup run. However, he does seem to have a habit of making things difficult for himself. The one thing I won’t tolerate as a fan is having a manager or an official lie to us…. enough of that at the old club.

Wish he just came out and said he wanted to try something that didn’t work! Anyway…. think he’s on thin ice, and the irony is it’s not so much results, but his inability to adhere himself to the fans. No more lies

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: Logan on Fbook by Boro345

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 19:00:47, 184 views. In reply to 'Logan on Fbook'

I think the impact of this one is the lie he has told and made himself look a tit when the player comes forward and says what really happened

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: RE: Logan on Fbook by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 19:25:49, 186 views. In reply to 'RE: Logan on Fbook'

I must admit I was very surprised by SK’s claim in that interview that Logan was happy coming off the bench each game. It just seemed very implausible. A striker who is happy to sit on the bench? He must be the first one ever. Maybe it just came out wrong and he meant to say Billy’s just glad to make the squad given the number of others who have been axed.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

So lies by 9 years in

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 20:53:17, 158 views. In reply to 'RE: Logan on Fbook'

Remember the Rory Skelton lie told him to not turn up so Rory worked Saturday then criticised him for missing the match did ask ever get confronted about that a young local lad

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Doesn’t do SAFC any favours by Anony Mouse

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 21:16:26, 185 views. In reply to 'RE: Logan on Fbook'

But there appears more to have been a miscommunication. SK (and CB, and they will have talked about this remember) believe that Billy wants to be an ‘impact sub’. Billy has agreed that that discussion took place but it appears that they took different things away at the end of the discussion.

Lies ? I’m not convinced. SK would not have made that statement if he didn’t feel that it was the truth, what would he have to gain ?

He’s admitted they tried something on Saturday. That it didn’t work was disappointing, but it didn’t.

He’s said he wants a new striker, it’s not been a secret, he was talking about it before the FA Cup exit. We need a 20 goal a season man. Preferably a big lad IMO. Then I think we have a squad that will challenge for the top 2 places IMO.

We don’t need knee jerk reactions, we need to pull together. We need to win on Saturday and start a ‘run’ like we put together at the end of last season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: Doesn’t do SAFC any favours by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 21:49:55, 151 views. In reply to 'Doesn’t do SAFC any favours'

Agreed, not sure SK has got this one right, but mistakes are allowed. Just get behind the team.

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile", except for Che.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: RE: Doesn’t do SAFC any favours by Zante Seadog

Posted: 14/11/2017 at 12:58:46, 128 views. In reply to 'RE: Doesn’t do SAFC any favours'

Exactly This!!! Sea Sea Seasiders !!!!!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: Logan on Fbook by Zante Seadog

Posted: 14/11/2017 at 09:30:48, 163 views. In reply to 'Logan on Fbook'

The fact that a player is spouting on social media shows a distinct lack of professionism either way. Sk quotes that Logan said what he said in front of a Chris Bolder too so is there two sides and the not?
I know many will disagree but Logan is not the answer to our problems. Hang on, I don’t have a problem being 4th! I’ll have a problem when we are 4th bottom of back at Brid and NCEL football.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Lack of professionalism? by New Seadog

Posted: 14/11/2017 at 14:31:56, 172 views. In reply to 'RE: Logan on Fbook'

It was firstly shown by the manager by discussing private conversations with the media. You can’t have it both ways. If the manager sets a precedent of not discussing internal matters and wants the players to follow then fine, but he spoke to the media about a private conversation, and the player has responded in kind.

In my opinion, the manager doesn’t need to justify his selections to the fans. Even though I didn’t agree at all with the Stimpson move, he is the manager and he gets to pick the team. The who, why and wherefores are up to him. He’s judged on that and can’t feasibly have to justify a decision each time he makes one that isn’t ‘the norm’.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90400

For some reason i am unable to reply to threads on here by Athletico seadog

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 17:46:40, 84 views.

I just wanted to add from below thread that Billy Logan wanted to play for Trafalgar on sunday. Scored about 5 goals in a 9-0 win but mysteriously has not appeared on the match card.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90399

Need a striker why not Clarkson? by Burndog101 User: Burndog101

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 14:28:45, 117 views.

I’ve got no idea why SK didn’t give Lewis a proper chance. And we can all cut the rubbish about loans and game time it’s a way to say they aren’t coming back. When we had Lewis back a couple of years ago he was a real threat and a proper last man sort of striker. I think he would fit straight into our team no problem, that’s if he’s fit of course.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: Need a striker why not Clarkson? by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 15:20:12, 135 views. In reply to 'Need a striker why not Clarkson?'

He’s not a target man, which is what SK needs. We already have small nippy forwards in Coulson and Wright , the number 9 in the centre of those two needs to be something different

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90398

Have we fallen into the trap of thinking crowds = success? by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 13:55:44, 128 views.

We can all agree that the club feels a lot bigger this season than it has in the previous decade. Averaging over 1,000 at home when in the past it’s been in the 300s makes us feel like we are a giant in this league. Only South Shields are outdoing us, and it’s nearly a 700 fan drop to Glossop in third place in the attendance tables. But since when did good crowds = success?

Have a word with Leyton Orient in the Conference. Attendance table: 3rd, actual table: 19th.
Have a word with Darlington and FC United in the Conference North. Attendance table: 5th/3rd, actual table: 13th/19th.
Have a word with Stafford Rangers in the league above. Attendance table: 3rd, actual table: 12th.

Despite our recent slip-ups, we are doing better than last season. Last season we got 73 points from 42 games at 1.74pts per game. This season we’ve got 29 from 14 at 2.07. If we repeat the form of our opening 14 games twice again, we’ll get 14 more points than last season (87), and will be borderline 2nd position.

We have also reached the 4th Qualifying Round of the FA Cup. We were one result away from being on BBC Match of the Day live against MK Dons of League One. Read that sentence again. Last season, we lost at Tadcaster in the first game.

So yes, we are suddenly a big fish in a smallish pond, but as soon as we start admitting this or thinking it, that’s when trouble hits.

South Shields didn’t panic when Colwyn Bay beat them. They just got on with it. Likewise when we lost at Glossop, we beat Ramsbottom four days later at home.

Yes we’re struggling against the better sides, and yes, we might have to “settle" for the playoffs, but please remember that everything is new this season. For the board. For the manager. For the players. For the fans. New ground, new pitch, new expectations, new atmosphere. That isn’t easy.

Stick with us. If we finish 5th, so be it, we’ll have to do it the hard way, but let’s not be too hard on ourselves. We’re probably the 3rd or 4th best team in this league at the moment, and still looking to recuit players to strengthen. Two seasons ago we finished 20th and had a home crowd of 211. Let’s not run before we can walk eh? Let’s match last season’s playoff position as a minimum, and hopefully go one better. Anything else is a bonus (such as a record breaking cup run…).

Up the Boro.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: Have we fallen into the trap of thinking crowds = success? by Revd Up

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 14:05:08, 123 views. In reply to 'Have we fallen into the trap of thinking crowds = success?'

Let common sense prevail,well said Malton.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

also malton by cool bird User: cool bird

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 14:48:37, 117 views. In reply to 'Have we fallen into the trap of thinking crowds = success?'

new squad as well,yes we got off to a flier which got us in a great position but the problem being that now its expected every game,every team hits a inconsistant patch,the proof of the pudding is how you deal with it
SK knows we need a couple more players,i`d be more concerned if he didn`t ,lets get behind the team and stop playing fifa.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: also malton by Belfast Seadog

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 19:12:09, 107 views. In reply to 'also malton'

Crowds don’t automatically mean success but on the whole there is a correlation. Crowds = money and that generally has a big impact on success.

As a club we have had just two promotions in a decade despite having the higuest attendances in most of the leagues we’ve played in. I think we’ve underachieved as a club. Of course that’s not Kittrick’s fault but I don’t think fans expectations of progress up the leagues is unreasonable.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

But you are implying … by Anony Mouse

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 21:34:01, 94 views. In reply to 'RE: also malton'

That big crowds means more money. And at this level it doesn’t always correlate. Shaw Lane ?

We’re not that affluent when compared to other clubs. We had the 3rd or 4th highest wage bill last year, we came 3rd. Not an underachievement or overachievement. We get our money from different sources. And remember we spent 10 years in Brid, 20 miles from the fans and businesses that we need to support us.

On another note, some fans are (rightly) calling for ground improvements etc. We can only spend the money once.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Spot on malton by Joe90

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 22:07:23, 87 views. In reply to 'But you are implying …'

Talking sense again.. I can’t believe the crap I read on here sometimes… give SK a break he maybe not Mr PR but am sure his doing his best for us… his got a great opportunity to do something with us after all we are a ‘big fish’ in a small pound so every team will have 10% more desire to prove a point against us…. I haven’t seen any team this year much better than us, it’s between us and Hyde… I’d like to know why paddy doesn’t want to play for us though..

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90397

Steve Kittrick on Danny Stimpson decision… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 13:51:39, 114 views.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Logan only wants to be a sub? by Fendog

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 15:20:12, 117 views. In reply to 'Steve Kittrick on Danny Stimpson decision…'

I don’t know Billy personally but cannt believe a player would say such a thing to a manager. Jimmy not fit enough.??? Why put him on the bench.? Surely you play him and see how long he lasts? Somethings just not adding up at the minute!

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90396

Damage to Hyde’s 4G pitch estimated at £12,500 by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 13:29:32, 104 views.

but MK Dons fans trying to help out:

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Awww poor hyde by Dazaster

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 22:45:47, 86 views. In reply to 'Damage to Hyde’s 4G pitch estimated at £12,500'

Did Hyde fans help Boston Town pay for damage they caused?? Erm no. Sick of hearing about poor Hyde…

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90395

FA Trophy draw by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 13:17:27, 81 views.

For those who are still interested:

1 Brackley Town v Salford City
2 York City v Coalville Town
3 Hednesford Town or Cleethorpes Town v Spennymoor Town
4 Grantham Town v Chorley
5 Tamworth v Warrington Town or Ashton United
6 AFC Telford United v Droylsden
7 Darlington v Harrogate Town
8 Gainsborough Trinity v Stafford Rangers
9 Bradford (Park Avenue) v Stourbridge
10 Boston United v Kidderminster Harriers
11 Nuneaton Town v North Ferriby United
12 Stockport County v Southport
13 Blyth Spartans v Stalybridge Celtic
14 Glossop North End v Workington
15 Alfreton Town v Altrincham
16 Leamington v Curzon Ashton
17 Lancaster City v Mildenhall Town
18 Marine v FC United Of Manchester
19 Lewes v Truro City
20 Havant & Waterlooville v Dorking Wanderers
21 East Thurrock United v Shortwood United
22 Taunton Town or Beaconsfield Town v Concord Rangers
23 Hemel Hempstead Town v Bognor Regis Town
24 Farnborough or Banbury United v Hartley Wintney
25 Oxford City v Hereford or Potters Bar Town
26 Hendon v Slough Town
27 Braintree Town v Moneyfields or Cray Wanderers
28 Welling United v Weston Super Mare
29 St Albans City v Poole Town
30 Metropolitan Police v Wingate & Finchley
31 Whitehawk v Chippenham Town
32 Sittingbourne or Haringey Borough v Thame United
33 Brentwood Town v Dartford
34 Chesham United v Gloucester City
35 Hungerford Town v Billericay Town
36 Hampton & Richmond Borough v Harlow Town
37 Bath City v Margate or Bowers & Pitsea
38 Wealdstone v Chelmsford City
39 Eastbourne Borough v Royston Town
40 Ashford Town (Middx) or Kingstonian v Heybridge Swifts

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90394

Prediction Competition: Latest League Table by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 08:49:08, 42 views.

Apologies for the delay. Hectic at the moment, mixed in with a week in Canada.

Anyway - here’s the table after the Colne, Glossop, Ramsbottom, and Prescot Cables games.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90393

Bus by Merseydog

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 23:29:44, 89 views.

Hi I’m after any advice I’m coming over to Scarborough. and I will be going next saturday
Is there a bus to take you to the ground. It will be my first visit to the new ground

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

visit by Anony Mouse

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 23:42:49, 83 views. In reply to 'Bus'

I don’t think the FlamingoLand Stadium is on a bus route. I haven’t seen any buses approaching the ground or evidence of a bus stop near the ground.

However it is within pretty easy walking distance of the town centre and Falsgrave. If walking is truly an issue then Seamer Road is really close to one of the sets of turnstiles. You would have to alight the bus on Seamer Road, walk under a bridge that carries the railway line overhead and then proceed to the turnstile.

Hope you enjoy your visit,

Anony Mouse

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Buses by Old man

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 02:05:15, 82 views. In reply to ' visit'

If your coming by car plenty of parking next to the sport’s village buses only from railway station every 30 MINS to seamer road entrance 17 or 777 service. I use these services every home match be at the bus stops on westborough opposite the sjt theatre 2pm onwards

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Bus from outside Railway Station by Old Git

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 09:49:33, 77 views. In reply to 'Buses'

The number 17. Not sure which bus shelter
but it should be numbered or just ask someone.
It stops at Lidl which is the old Athletic Ground,
so get off and walk back up the road until you see the
road down under the rail bridge.
if you know Seamer Road there is another stop
at Roseberry Avenue, which means a walk down to the rail bridge
so either stop is perfect for a short walk to ground.
Every 15 mins on Saturday.
If you’re going straight back to Railway Station after game
walk down to Lidl and get any bus back, including the
Coastliner 843.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90392

Shaw lane manager leaves for Boston job by ka114 User: ka114

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 21:52:34, 142 views.

Will SK be tempted to go to shaw lane? Am I right in thinking SK is based near Barnsley? Would cut down on travelling, and they are fourth in the division above with money to burn

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

I hope not by YorkshireJAMES

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 22:32:42, 118 views. In reply to 'Shaw lane manager leaves for Boston job'

But in football anything is possible, really hope he doesn’t leave mind

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

I don’t think shaw lane will by 9 years in

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 22:53:16, 125 views. In reply to 'I hope not'

I some how don’t think shaw lane will be happy to better or match Steve kittricks £600 a week wage

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

I somehow do… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 23:19:28, 108 views. In reply to 'I don’t think shaw lane will'

(if that is indeed his wage) because they’re made of money. They’re not known as $haw £ane for nowt. But hopefully not.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE I somehow do by YorkshireJAMES

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 23:37:48, 104 views. In reply to 'I somehow do…'

Shaw Lane will be able to easily match what SK is on at Boro, like you say though I hope he doesn’t go (if of course he’s ever approached)

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Can’t blame him by Joe90

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 06:24:35, 110 views. In reply to 'RE I somehow do'

After all the rubbish which is spouted off, 4th the league, game in hand… people need to calm down let’s see how far we from second at Xmas… I have always liked him and was pleased to get him, I think we are lucky to have him..

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: Can’t blame him by Che.. User: Che..

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 08:25:23, 86 views. In reply to 'Can’t blame him'

Well said.

And if he went that runs the risk of others going too. What if Slade uses it as an opportunity to recall Max? What if other players get their heads turned by opportunities…or don’t fit into a new manager’s plan?

Everything looking rosy, we’re well placed for all 3 of our promotion routes out.

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talked the most sense on here by a mile...on one solitary occasion."

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: RE: Can’t blame him by shadowseadog User: shadowseadog

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 08:35:04, 126 views. In reply to 'RE: Can’t blame him'

Unfortunately there is a lot of Boro fans who are full of shit and completely clueless about football, as Saturday proved. I was frustrated that we lost on Saturday but I’m not screaming for the manager to leave!!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: RE: RE: Can’t blame him by YorkshireJAMES

Posted: 13/11/2017 at 12:29:41, 102 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Can’t blame him'

Nobody moans when we win and players have poor games, some games we’ve won and rode our luck at the same time, people need to seriously look at the bigger picture, we’re all pissed off when we lose and yet we’re all elated when we win, can win games when you shouldn’t and you can lose games when you think you shouldn’t..

Fact of the matter is if your not switched mentally you can come unstuck, players are still human at the end of the day, we win and lose together, last thing we need is a big devide between the fans, it’s crucial that we continue to push the lads on, even when they make mistakes !

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90391

Stimpson up front, panic and …… by Zante Seadog

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 13:39:15, 156 views.

Stop the negativity ffs
‘If’ Stimpson says he can do a job up front then why not give him a chance. It didn’t work,
Shit happens. Lesson learnt. If he’d banged a couple in SK would be a genius right now.
It didn’t work, SK openly admits we need a 20+ striker to add to the jigsaw. You can’t go to tesco and pick one up but he’s trying.
We need to get behind the team through thick and thin, we’re hardly having a bad season, 4th in the league, lots of football to play.
Just my opinion and I’m happy to read everyone else’s opinions but I firmly believe if we all get behind our team we will be up there when it matters. Shouting abuse doesn’t help the lads on the pitch or the manager or the bench. Although I do think some of our fans enjoy moaning more when we get beat than they do cheering when we’re winning. ;)

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: Stimpson up front, panic and …… by dan

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 14:25:19, 152 views. In reply to 'Stimpson up front, panic and ……'

Couldn’t agree more! moaning and negativity is not going to take the team forward. Go for a 10 minute walk instead of posting such comments, am sure you will feel better for it !

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE Stimpson upfront, panic and …….. by YorkshireJAMES

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 15:16:30, 125 views. In reply to 'Stimpson up front, panic and ……'

Again nice to read some realism on here, our fans do tend to bitch and moan when we lose agreed, yet when we win and someone still has a bad game all you hear people say is it doesn’t matter we won the game !

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

clarkson scored for Barton again by deep seadog User: deep seadog

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 15:23:13, 124 views. In reply to 'RE Stimpson upfront, panic and ……..'

our striker out on loan scoring in a poor side in last 2 games, to be honest I think the reason for the hostility and a few people loosing faith in Kitterick is the strange & unpopular decision to get rid of Turnbull, how did his replacement do yesterday ?

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE Clarkson scored for Barton today by YorkshireJAMES

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 15:29:45, 136 views. In reply to 'clarkson scored for Barton again'

Clarkson always seems to be injured, when he arrived back at boro he couldn’t get in the team due to the strikers we had at the time, since then he’s gone out on loan and not done a right lot until yesterday..

As for Turnbull yh he’s had to go out and get some games and we’ve brought someone in who did one thing wrong yesterday and it was his first game, needs a few matches to get used to the other players in the team, far too early to judge..

Pickering played 5 at the back and even then they let a goal in against a very poor Barton side, even with Matty in at CB, it’s all swings and roundabouts!

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: RE Clarkson scored for Barton today by deep seadog User: deep seadog

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 15:39:22, 142 views. In reply to 'RE Clarkson scored for Barton today'

I don’t know how hes playing but hes scored in last 2 games, It just seems that once they go they are gone for ever, only time will tell but I suspect Matty will soon be taken by one of our rivals, any money on tadcaster ?, as you say time will prove the wisdom of the decision but at the moment most fans are unhappy with it so if it doesn’t work the buck stops with the manager & as I say I think its the reason the fans are less positive towards him.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

re Clarkson and Turnbull by scout

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 20:50:04, 121 views. In reply to 'RE: RE Clarkson scored for Barton today'

Clarkson never seemed interested and got sent off, Turnbull had an average game - did not stand out

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: RE Clarkson scored for Barton today by Exsafcspectator

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 16:29:32, 150 views. In reply to 'RE Clarkson scored for Barton today'

Actually Pickering played 3 at the back and Barton played well but Pickering did win!

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Can we stop saying we “got rid of” Turnbull? by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 16:58:04, 158 views. In reply to 'RE: RE Clarkson scored for Barton today'

It was Matty’s choice to move away to get first team football.

Yes, SK dropped him due to poor performances, but he also asked him to sit and watch at Kendal (as per his interview) and didn’t simply tell him to stay at home. SK didn’t think Matty warranted a place in the team for one reason or another, and when he did play, wasn’t happy with his performances. Because of this, Matty decided to ask to go to Pickering to play first team football.

We didn’t let him go - he wanted to leave to play football. SK’s only “crime" in all this is not giving Matty time on the pitch, rightly or wrongly depending on your views.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

all hear say really, who actually knows whats been said by deep seadog User: deep seadog

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 18:30:04, 138 views. In reply to 'Can we stop saying we “got rid of” Turnbull? '

All I see is a player that gave 100% every game, yes he made a couple of errors but was he on his own ? we are now told the new player Needs games to settle in, didn’t go on Saturday but apparently defensive blunders and unable to defend corners, so nothings changed there

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Re:Stimpson up front etc by BoroNo7 User: BoroNo7

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 19:24:23, 157 views. In reply to 'Stimpson up front, panic and ……'

There’s been much comment this week about perceived weaknesses in the team and SK’s response to this situation

SK ( and therefore the Club) and the players involved are both victims of the structure/financial constraints of football at our level

Years ago SFC, and others like us , had a Reserve team which played n the Yorkshire League.We could therefore maintain a squad of potential 1st team players, on contracts, with the opportunity for players who were either returning from injury and/or loss of form to get regular football and press for a return to the 1st team - a situation which benefited both player and Club.

We don’t have that luxury these days , many Football League sides can,t afford a second team, so let’s have a bit more understanding of the difficulties of both the manager and also of players who are not playing regularly - I have sympathy for all those involved


  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90390

Used to play centre forward…. by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 13:29:03, 118 views.

…..wonder if I can get a game this Saturday

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Whoops by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 15:03:26, 97 views. In reply to 'Used to play centre forward….'

Forgot to add …. Just trying to lighten up the situation

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90389

PRESCOT CABLES v BORO video online now by Old Git

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 13:20:09, 64 views.

Didn’t get the first 2 Prescot goals but you get
the play leading up to them. I watched both
over the top of my camera and forgot to follow the ball with it.
Hope some other video of Prescot’s 2nd goal appears as it seems
everyone in our defence lost sight of the ball and it just floated into
the net. View would have been different at that end of the ground.
WARNING. In the second half Boro had a flurry of corners
and it was very dark down at the corner amongst the trees
and the bramble bushes so far about a second it is very dark
then the image improves slightly when the ball goes into
the goal area.

All the fun can be found here

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90388

Dave Merris to be goalkeeper home to Trafford on Saturday by filey1

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 23:27:40, 137 views.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90387

Steve Kittrick reaction & Prescot coach chips in at the end! by club.comms User: club.comms

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:53:18, 191 views.

Edited by admin on 11/11/17 at 21:56:25
  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90386

Did Rudy… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:50:42, 173 views.

used to get as much stick for his catchphrase “To be perfectly honest" as SK does for “it is what it is?"

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE Did Rudy by YorkshireJAMES

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 23:21:13, 147 views. In reply to 'Did Rudy…'

No I don’t think he did, fans ran him out of the club in the end, hope SK doesn’t go the same way!

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: RE Did Rudy by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 00:45:45, 139 views. In reply to 'RE Did Rudy'

No they didn’t

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Fans did what ? by Anony Mouse

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 08:47:36, 158 views. In reply to 'RE Did Rudy'

Fans absolutely did not run Rudy out of SAFC. Rudy quit the club for his own reasons but the fans were certainly not one of them. If you talk to Rudy then he will confirm that he still holds all the fans of SAFC in the highest regard which is probably one of the reasons that he is in touch with quite a number of them.

Perhaps YorkshireJAMES you ought to do some research before you post.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Fans did what ? by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 11:49:16, 116 views. In reply to 'Fans did what ?'

100% correct Anony Mouse.


  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE Fans did what by YorkshireJAMES

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 15:21:07, 92 views. In reply to 'Fans did what ?'

No one said you had to agree with my opinion, that’s just what it is my opinion, last month or so of Rudy’s tenure all you heard especially at away games was stuff like, “your clueless Rudy” “do the right thing Rudy and go, the team is pathetic” “we’re a joke”

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

You are entirely correct. by Anony Mouse

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 16:03:55, 84 views. In reply to 'RE Fans did what'

You are entitled to an opinion.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Talking of Rudy Funk… by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 17:32:57, 116 views. In reply to 'You are entirely correct.'

His team AFC Mansfield are doing really well in the NCEL Prem. Sitting nicely in 5th place with games in hand.

Incidentally, not sure if there is an issue with Mansfield’s ground or something but looking at their results I notice they have now played eight consecutive matches away from home and are due to make that 9 on Wednesday when they play Workshop (if it’s nothing to do with their ground then it’s a bizarre run of fixtures by any measure!).

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90385

Video interview with Steve Kittrick … by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:26:50, 87 views.

Edited by admin on 11/11/17 at 21:42:39
  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90384

Don’t panick by Danae69

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:19:56, 98 views.

We lossed a football match today,It happens every now and then some fans starting to question sk and his tactics but were still right up there in the mix for promotion places,its only November and more additions will come especially up front.Other teams will lose to each other as its a long cold winter so don’t worry believe in sk to steer us to promotion😀

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE Don’t panic by YorkshireJAMES

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:29:53, 79 views. In reply to 'Don’t panick'

Ah atlast some realisation and common sense on here.. fair play

It’s a marathon not a sprint

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90383

SK Interview by shadowseadog User: shadowseadog

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:14:27, 125 views.

I’m eagerly awaiting SK post match interview today. Terrible decision to play Stimpson up front, he was running around like a headless chicken for 45 minutes so I’m keen to see his explanation on that. Bit pissed off with some Boro fans today after the final whistle, pretty much shouting for Kittrick to fuck off out of the club. Top supporting there

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

usual suspects by Old Git

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:18:36, 125 views. In reply to 'SK Interview'

and they were on the bus
but can’t recall them saying anything
on the journey back.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE SK Interview by YorkshireJAMES

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:28:25, 127 views. In reply to 'SK Interview'

He explains it perfectly in the interviews, why he has to justify himself when what’s said in the dressing room is private to anyone is beyond me, people telling him to fuck off is disgraceful, no need at all, you’d think we were on the verge of getting relegated the way some people go on..

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE: RE SK Interview by shadowseadog User: shadowseadog

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:34:05, 117 views. In reply to 'RE SK Interview '

As a fan I’d like to know why he’s made that decision as I’m sure many others are

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

RE SK Interview by YorkshireJAMES

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:46:52, 112 views. In reply to 'RE: RE SK Interview '

He said why that decision was made, between the manager and the player (Stimpson)

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Thread: 90382

very brief match report by Old Git

Posted: 11/11/2017 at 21:12:30, 87 views.

1 st half very little happened
2nd half at 1-1 there looked to be only one winner, Boro
We were all over them and just couldn’t get a second.
and then we basically gifted them 2 goals.
To be honest their first came from a failure to kick clear instead of head clear.
So from my vantage point all 3 were from errors.
After that Prescot looked as though they’d score more
but we kept getting the ball up to their area but couldn’t make our
breaks count.
At 1-1 it has been a really decent 2nd half for the neutral.
Our goal came from the kick-off after they scored, the ball was played back
to Taylor who belted it up field, a pass and a long ball that Billy Logan chased down,
after a bit on interchange in the left-hand corner
the ball was crossed low into the box and Coulo touched home.
I’ll post some video tomorrow
Have to say it was very dark in the ground, they have a huge dark coloured main stand
and a lot of talls trees that soak up the light even when the sunshines, which it didn’t do
for 85 mins. So 2nd half video,(all the goals, naturally) might not to be too good.
There was at least 2 other people with video cameras so something better might pop up,
as the actress said to the bishop.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:

Just checked video from yesterday by Old Git

Posted: 12/11/2017 at 10:34:25, 81 views. In reply to 'very brief match report'

and it was Dave Merris not Tom Taylor
who played the ball upfield for our goal.
An easy mistake to make as they are
of similar build and were wearing the same strip.

  • Reply
  • IP Address:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.