Newest Message: Feature in Football Focus Magazine by club.comms on 22/1/2018, 18:18:20 - View Thread

14

Thread: 90667

Ssssssshhhhhh by saudi seadog User: saudi seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 20:19:42, 141 views.

Ssssssshhhhh you doubters!

Saudi SeaDog

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.25.128.101

Thread: 90666

Who was your MOM today by Tim lazenby

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:52:34, 125 views.

I thought the whole team played well .Wally & coulo lead the line well but for me Gooda was a solid rock at the back , and a bonus he’s staying with us for the rest of the season

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.164.154

Coulson by sick boy User: sick boy

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 18:07:21, 121 views. In reply to 'Who was your MOM today '

Unplayable in first half. Best player on the pitch.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.201.198.66

RE: Coulson by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 18:16:44, 135 views. In reply to 'Coulson'

I second that… So dangerous on that wing today. He was absolute class along with Walshaw. Walshaw was so clever today. Everything he did was spot on. Also, the time wasting was brilliant too

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.232.197.82

Walshaw got my MOTM. by .-. …

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 19:33:52, 128 views. In reply to 'RE: Coulson'

Head and shoulders above the rest. Only thing he didn’t do was score but he was a menace to the defenders.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 165.120.232.92

Walshaw by old seadog User: old seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 21:24:18, 125 views. In reply to 'Who was your MOM today '

Walshaw was awesome today and his work allowed Coulo to destroy them
Gooda and Hewitt were superb
Valentine was a class above their midfield
The rest of the lads all were outstanding

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.98.114.126

100% Walshaw by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 2/1/2018 at 00:30:38, 100 views. In reply to 'Who was your MOM today '

He might not have got a goal but he won EVERYTHING in the air. Was much more mobile than I expected and just scared the shot out of the defence. Even the shields fans were complimenting him stood next to me!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.180.214.75

Walshaw by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 2/1/2018 at 11:28:43, 100 views. In reply to '100% Walshaw'

Really great to see him settling in now. If he can duplicate the form reported here it can only look good for the rest of the season. We are still one position light in the squad. Anybody heard how Paul Robson is doing these days?

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

Burniston by cool bird User: cool bird

Posted: 3/1/2018 at 11:49:11, 69 views. In reply to 'Walshaw'

did you go to shields ? if you are thinking rb position then you shouldnt be too concerned as jack was outstanding,since he came back in he has played very well especially as hes come back from injury,deffo a future dave merris in the making.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.158.176.137

Thread: 90665

Looking forward to Kittrick’s interview today by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:43:24, 84 views.

He should be pretty chirpy after that. Plus, he promised to tell us after this game what their points target had been for those 4 festive fixtures.

It is what it is.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

Thread: 90664

Last 3 games since the world ended (on here) against Hyde… by Dunno

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:23:26, 134 views.

3 wins, 10 goals scored, 2 conceded.

That is quite some response from the team and management. Well done, bloody brilliant.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.192.73

RE: Last 3 games since the world ended (on here) against Hyde… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:26:55, 143 views. In reply to 'Last 3 games since the world ended (on here) against Hyde…'

Oh yeah, I remember the game which was the “writing on the wall", since when we’ve beaten a dangerous Taddy side full of ex-seadogs, the top form side in Clitheroe, and the best team in the league. Even after Hyde I wasn’t panicking as we had 2 points per game even then!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

Genuine question by cynic

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:45:37, 138 views. In reply to 'RE: Last 3 games since the world ended (on here) against Hyde…'

Can anybody who was at both games (and only somebody who was) give any thoughts/ideas/reasons as to the differences (if any, must be logically but who knows?) in the two performances?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.74.118.35

Re genuine question by Steve 0337

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:50:41, 119 views. In reply to 'Genuine question'

Desire, effort, commitment..Also set up right..No comparison..Absoloutely brilliant..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.164.125

Apologies for “writing on the wall” comment. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 19:53:27, 121 views. In reply to 'RE: Last 3 games since the world ended (on here) against Hyde…'

It seems more applicable to South Shields now having dropped points in a number of recent games, both today and at home to Trafford, not forgetting Kendal away. Does this mean they are no longer “dead certs” for automatic promotion?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.188.127.169

RE: Apologies for “writing on the wall” comment. by Dunno

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 19:58:26, 109 views. In reply to 'Apologies for “writing on the wall” comment.'

I wouldn’t worry, at least one of us thinks it every time we don’t paste a team 6-0.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.192.73

Nah… by Sick Boy Unreg

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 20:04:43, 96 views. In reply to 'Apologies for “writing on the wall” comment.'

This will give them a boot up the arse. They’ll still win the league I think - although do they have to play Hyde twice…?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.201.198.66

RE: Nah… by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 22:03:17, 89 views. In reply to 'Nah…'

Yes, I was just thinking that. Hyde & S Shields have to play each other twice still & so some points will be dropped.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

RE: RE: Nah… by Sick Boy Unreg

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 22:10:39, 91 views. In reply to 'RE: Nah…'

And we have to play Bamber Bridge twice… and Prescot at home! Some points are going to go missing at some point, I just hope it’s in our favour… :)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.201.198.66

RE: Last 3 games since the world ended (on here) against Hyde… by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 18:54:04, 118 views. In reply to 'Last 3 games since the world ended (on here) against Hyde…'

Quite, no doubt there will be some humble pie being scoffed this evening.

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile", except for Che.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

Humble Pie? by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 23:02:38, 120 views. In reply to 'RE: Last 3 games since the world ended (on here) against Hyde…'

Why be so righteous? Enjoy today for what it is. Obviously an outstanding performance by the players and management getting it right away to a very good team. Absolutely delighted.

However, that doesn’t mean that the criticism after the Hyde game wasn’t justified.

These things happen. Hopefully it will have been used as a learning curve for everyone. This is an outstanding squad of footballers; hence the disappointment the other week.

Well done once again to everyone involved today; including what sounded like brilliant away support.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.79.222.88

RE: Humble Pie? by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 2/1/2018 at 17:32:08, 82 views. In reply to 'Humble Pie?'

Hardly righteous. Was agreeing with a statement praising players and management. The humble pie point wasn’t one about criticism of the Hyde performance itself - more about the knee-jerk reaction from some based on one result - “shambolic", “unacceptable", “manager doesn’t know what he’s doing" writing off the season etc etc. Perhaps a bit of “If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster, And treat those two impostors just the same" wouldn’t go amiss from time to time.

And yes, delighted as ever to see Boro win. A great start to the New Year.

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile", except for Che.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: RE: Humble Pie? by guy fawkes User: guy fawkes

Posted: 2/1/2018 at 18:29:40, 96 views. In reply to 'RE: Humble Pie?'

But it wasn’t just ‘one result’. It was part of a series of poor results and performances against teams in competition with us for promotion.

Given your earlier post and this reply, Willesden’s use of the word ‘righteous’ would seem appropriate to me.

The result and performance was fantastic, but we need to consistently produce that for the next 4 months or so because as SK keeps reminding us, that is when the league position will count.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.50.33.43

RE: RE: RE: Humble Pie? by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 2/1/2018 at 19:01:44, 86 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Humble Pie?'

How can I disagree with such learned individuals. Righteous it is.

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile", except for Che.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

In hindsight… by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 3/1/2018 at 01:11:19, 72 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Humble Pie?'

“Righteous” may have been severe; and apologies Tree, if you took it the wrong way; especially from someone guilty of the same accusaton several times over.

Your point about us needing to treat defeat and victory in the same manner is very valid.

One thing I’ve learned, and hence my “righteous” comment is that it is very dangerous just to defend the club no matter what.

That comes from my own personal experience. During my years as a volunteer, I’d get extremely narked, far too loyal on occasions and defensive to any criticism; when in hindsight much of it was valid.

The board, players and management will make some massive cock ups. That’s part of part time non-league football. It’s very important to accept that; but at the same time learn by those errors, and not brand anyone with a different opinion as trouble makers. There are trolls out there; and that’s a major peril of social media - but it doesn’t mean anybody who happens to point out such errors are trying to destabilise the club.

Quite often we are far too quick to jump down someone’s throat (myself included) when they have valid points. Would we have ended up with a begging bowl for £25K if we’d have been a little more balanced regarding the name of the posters who warned us that we were spending far too much?

Balance is very important. We currently have a board who I think are fair and accept errors, and are committed to correcting them. I’ve never been more confident about the future of our club both on and off the pitch; especially in light of the performance at South Shields - but also very aware that we’re only as good as our latest result; especially in the two crucial games against Bamber Bridge.

I’m also aware that poor business and financial plans can also drop us right in the mire once again; regardless of our current attendance figures.

I make no apology for challenging on and off the field matters if they may set the club backwards. That’s my duty as a Joint Owner.

Edited on 03/01/18 at 06:12:50
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.251.11.54

RE: In hindsight… by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 3/1/2018 at 01:53:47, 66 views. In reply to 'In hindsight…'

No need to apologise, but appreciated nonetheless.

Funnily enough, I was reflecting just now as to the difficulty of seeking to maintain a balanced view. The danger, as you rightly point out, is that the position taken is not really balanced, but conservative. For one I’ve certainly been guilty of that in the past, in respect of both on and off field issues.

Anyway, onwards and upwards in common cause!

Critically decried Surfing Seadog poster: "Most righteous on here by a mile"

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

Thread: 90663

it’s just been announced by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:16:05, 170 views.

that Bailey Gooda’s loan has been extended until the rest of the season!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

Great News by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:19:11, 105 views. In reply to 'it’s just been announced'


PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

Thread: 90662

212 people online… by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:13:52, 96 views.

That’s pretty impressive!

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.22.156.111

RE: 212 people online… by Stuntpele

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:39:15, 78 views. In reply to '212 people online…'

That’s more than some get for a home gate!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.40.57.157

Yeh but who are they? 😉 by Nick Finch

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 19:01:38, 87 views. In reply to 'RE: 212 people online…'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.3.111.99

Thread: 90661

Today’s results (boro stay 3rd) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:10:38, 93 views.

Atherton 0-1 Trafford
Clitheroe 3-0 Kendal
Colwyn Bay 2-2 Bamber Bridge
Goole 2-3 Colne
Hyde 2-0 Glossop
Mossley 0-0 Droysden
Ossett Town 0-1 Ossett Albion
Radcliffe 3-1 Ramsbottom
Skelmersdale 1-6 Prescot
South Shields 1-3 BORO
Tadcaster 5-0 Brighouse

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

Thread: 90660

Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 16:10:25, 177 views.

Atherton Collieries 0-1 Trafford (O’Brien) Att 204

Clitheroe (Newby 2, Willoughby) 3-0 Kendal Town Att 242

Colwyn Bay (Rokka, Booth) 2-2 Bamber Bridge (Milligan, pen, Waddecar) Att 213

Goole (Allott, Howe) 2-3 Colne (Crankshaw, Curran 2) Att 145

Hyde Utd (Pratt, Porritt) 2-0 Glossop N.E. Att 657

Mossley 0-0 Droylsden Att 310

Ossett Town 0-1 Ossett Albion (Priestley) Att 497

Radcliffe Borough (Williams, Czubik, Mukendi) 3-1 Ramsbottom Utd (Meaney) Att 208

Skelmersdale Utd (Fleming) 1-6 Prescot Cables (Almond 4, Dean, Burns) Att 293

South Shields (Holmes) 1-3 Scarborough Athletic (Coulson, pen, Valentine, Wright) Att 1,819

Tadcaster Albion (Savory, Pugh, Corner 2, Greening) 5-0 Brighouse Town Att 241

Edited on 01/01/18 at 18:49:40
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

RE: Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 2/1/2018 at 00:26:38, 25 views. In reply to 'Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North'

The attendances are a nice touch

246
428
215

1800+

243….

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.180.214.75

Thread: 90659

Half-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 15:19:41, 160 views.

Atherton Collieries 0-0 Trafford

Clitheroe 0-0 Kendal Town

Colwyn Bay 0-0 Bamber Bridge

Goole (Allott) 1-2 Colne (Crankshaw, Curran)

Hyde Utd (Pratt) 1-0 Glossop N.E.

Mossley 0-0 Droylsden

Ossett Town 0-1 Ossett Albion (Priestley)

Radcliffe Borough (Williams) 1-0 Ramsbottom Utd

Skelmersdale Utd 0-4 Prescot Cables (Almond 4)

South Shields 0-2 Scarborough Athletic (Coulson, pen, Valentine)

Tadcaster Albion (Savory) 1-0 Brighouse Town

Edited on 01/01/18 at 15:56:53
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

oh my days by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 15:21:03, 106 views. In reply to 'Half-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North'

3-0 already. They really are the real deal.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

Thread: 90658

Same team as Saturday by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 14:53:19, 67 views.

Same subs too. Stimpson and Knowles not ready yet.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

Sugden coming on for Cadman by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 15:28:51, 44 views. In reply to 'Same team as Saturday '

Which is a worry as it suggests he must be injured if being replaced this early.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

penalty for boro! n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 15:31:29, 34 views. In reply to 'Sugden coming on for Cadman'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

GOAAAAL Coulo penalty! n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 15:32:03, 42 views. In reply to 'penalty for boro! n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

Get in there! by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 15:35:17, 41 views. In reply to 'GOAAAAL Coulo penalty! n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.188.127.169

2-0 Valentine by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 15:40:03, 47 views. In reply to 'Get in there!'

I can barely believe my ears!!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

YYYEEESSS!!! by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 15:42:39, 53 views. In reply to '2-0 Valentine'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.188.127.169

Walshaw hits the post by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 15:44:57, 47 views. In reply to 'YYYEEESSS!!!'

as Will Baines nearly loses his voice in the excitement

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

half time 2-0 to Boro by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 15:47:55, 47 views. In reply to 'Walshaw hits the post'

What a half for Boro.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

GOOOOOALLL Max Wright makes it THREE n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 16:10:51, 42 views. In reply to 'half time 2-0 to Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

Bang in a 4th and we’ll overtake Shields in table! by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 16:11:20, 60 views. In reply to 'GOOOOOALLL Max Wright makes it THREE n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

RE: Bang in a 4th and we’ll overtake Shields in table! by Bramleyseadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 16:20:22, 91 views. In reply to 'Bang in a 4th and we’ll overtake Shields in table!'

HOLY

CR@P

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.227.72.183

3-1 now by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 16:50:36, 52 views. In reply to 'RE: Bang in a 4th and we’ll overtake Shields in table!'

they’ve got one back!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

Boro win 3-1 by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 16:53:03, 63 views. In reply to '3-1 now'

That is an INCREDIBLE result! Brilliant lads!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

Shields havent won at home since last year. by Dunno

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 16:55:10, 69 views. In reply to 'Boro win 3-1'

Awesome Boro.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.192.73

then again… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:00:53, 90 views. In reply to 'Shields havent won at home since last year.'

neither have we ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.48

ha ha, left myself open for that one. nt by Dunno

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 17:12:31, 48 views. In reply to 'then again…'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.192.73

Thread: 90656

Predictions for match. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 01:20:28, 57 views.

Mine: South Shields 1-1 Boro, att. 2,200

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.188.127.169

Thread: 90654

Happy New Year to all Seadogs :D by MAlcD

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 00:40:09, 43 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.24.102.19

Thread: 90652

Happy New Year to all Seadogs by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 00:17:56, 36 views.

Let’s make this one as memorable as 2009 and 2013.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.98

Thread: 90651

Fans forum by Athletico seadog

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 18:44:43, 105 views.

When will the next fans forum be please? Im sure it was announced for a date in January

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.51.172.251

Fans Forum by Graham North

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 21:00:47, 110 views. In reply to 'Fans forum'

Planned for 12th January - it will be for co owners / members only. Watch for further announcements.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 78.147.198.51

RE: Fans Forum by Athletico seadog

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 23:04:16, 69 views. In reply to 'Fans Forum'

Im a co-owner, thanks for the info

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.51.172.251

Thread: 90650

Boro Chairman Trevor Bull rounds up 2017 by club.comms User: club.comms

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 18:28:37, 90 views.

http://scarboroughathletic.com/news/2017-12-31/trevor-bull-2017-review

Happy New Year everyone

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.196.128

Thread: 90649

South shields game by Athletico seadog

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 17:45:25, 123 views.

Anyone unsure about going tomorrow go for it! We are going to need a good following. A couple of coaches are going i believe and only a few places are left from what i heard. I think its fair to say that shields will be promoted so it may be the only time we play there! Im hoping not but we need a vocal following. Id take a point we have nothing to lose. Go out and try to beat em if we get anything its a bonus!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.51.172.251

Absolutely no pressure tomorrow. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 19:16:45, 101 views. In reply to 'South shields game'

Most teams will go there and get beat. Most teams will lose at home to them too.

We need to go there, compete, have a go at them, and who knows what’ll happen. If we lose 3-1, so be it, but let’s just have a crack at them. They’ve drawn two on the bounce and might just be looking over their shoulders for the first time. Let’s use that and give them a real game.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Bang on. A boxers free punch tomorrow… by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 22:56:04, 87 views. In reply to 'Absolutely no pressure tomorrow.'

No pressure. Go out and give it a go.

Happy New Year to all Boro fans

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.79.222.87

To be fair… by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 01:17:13, 74 views. In reply to 'Bang on. A boxers free punch tomorrow…'

South Shields are entirely beatable. For example, many of their recent results have been similar to what ours were against comparable sides; such as Atherton at home when they won 3-1 (1-0), and at home to Trafford which was a 2-2 draw (1-1).

In addition to Shields’ recent dropped points, we must also consider that the pressure will overwhelmingly be on them to win. Top of the table, at home and with an anticipated bumper crowd. It is also their own pitch.

The only slight snag is that their players will be more rested than ours, not having had to turn out at Bamber Bridge whilst we hosted Tadcaster Albion on Boxing Day. For this reason, I feel we need to try and frustrate them, keeping players back in a solo attack regime and hopefully hit them on the break. Defence will be crucial.

In summary, we should turn up aiming for at least a point and making sure danger men like Cogden et al. are kept at arm’s length will be crucial.

Up the Boro’! Happy New Year!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.188.127.169

Thread: 90648

Goals from yesterday by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 10:33:34, 144 views.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXOap4ATFq8&feature=youtu.be

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.90.58

RE: Goals from yesterday by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 12:47:59, 99 views. In reply to 'Goals from yesterday '

Four top drawer finishes, especially Merris, wow!

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile", except for Che.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: RE: Goals from yesterday by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 17:21:39, 73 views. In reply to 'RE: Goals from yesterday '

I love how shocked Valentine and Wright look at the quality of the Merris goal, you can see their reactions clearer in the slow motion replays

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.98

Thread: 90647

crowd today of 1001 by Villager

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 09:30:26, 126 views.

IOO1 used to clean a big big carpet for less than half a crown . but today it was just sweeping the opposition away ,great to watch ,well done team and fans

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.227.170.217

RE: crowd today of 1001 by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 31/12/2017 at 12:51:03, 104 views. In reply to 'crowd today of 1001'

The support is fantastic. When you consider we weren’t averaging a great many more in the final seasons of the old club, it just goes to show the potential.

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile", except for Che.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

Past teams brought more away fans. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 01:23:17, 73 views. In reply to 'RE: crowd today of 1001'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.188.127.169

We averaged 912 in our final season as SFC. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2018 at 10:01:26, 62 views. In reply to 'Past teams brought more away fans.'

1,063 so far this season.

Our first aim should be to finish with an average of 1,000+, but if not, finishing with a 912+ average would be symbolic.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Thread: 90646

Interview by Kkitkat

Posted: 30/12/2017 at 21:10:39, 102 views.

Can find wills interveiw with kitkat

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 148.252.128.134

Not online yet, will be uploaded by SAFC TV on YouTube n/t by Willb User: Willb

Posted: 30/12/2017 at 21:29:56, 103 views. In reply to 'Interview '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.40.248.135

Thread: 90645

Re. today’s match. by Stepney Seadog1

Posted: 30/12/2017 at 20:06:57, 145 views.

Clitheroe must have felt confident today to continue their 7 match unbeaten run, and a 2-0 win over Hyde. As it happens they were well beaten by a Boro side who never stopped working for each other and played some very attractive football. It would be very difficult to choose a MOTM today, but when our midfield take charge like they did today, it makes it so much easier for our forwards to score great goals. Up the Boro.!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.220.85.113
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.