Newest Message: Christmas Draw Tickets - ONLINE by Nick Finch on 19/11/2017, 12:04:42 - View Thread

26

Thread: 90341

Steve Kittrick interview after Rammy win by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 20:21:53, 133 views.

http://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-steve-kittrick-after-boro-s-win-against-ramsbottom-1-8841154

Edited by admin on 05/11/17 at 01:58:56
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.157.103

Thread: 90340

Match today by Leeds seadog 27

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 19:37:54, 151 views.

We won when not at our best, so have to be pleased with that. I personally thought max wright deserved motm today, however, I’m sure mezza probably deserved it. Onto another tough game at Prescot who are flying!

Oh I thought the ref had a shocker today.. Awful!

Up the boro!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.26.23.86

I agree about the ref but ….. by beckywitch User: beckywitch

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 20:01:59, 139 views. In reply to 'Match today '

At least it appeared to be an unbiased shocker.

beckywitch

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.208.27.243

Thread: 90339

100th competitive game in charge for Steve Kittrick today by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 19:21:04, 81 views.

100 games, 47 wins, 17 draws & 36 losses (47% win percentage)

www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.180.175.236

Thread: 90338

Nice finsh by Villager

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 18:21:15, 122 views.

Well done Boro keeping em at bay after their determined attempt at getting something out of the game, the highlight for me was Mezza taking control in the closing 3 minutes and not allowing the ball to be given away ,this was crucial ,and it was done with aplomb.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.220.252.6

agreed by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 18:24:23, 112 views. In reply to 'Nice finsh'

Didn’t know what to expect from a Rammy side who’d won 6 and lost 6 in the league, had been walloped 4-0 by Colne but had then destroyed Shaw Lane in extra time in the FA Trophy. Once they got a goal back it was a case of squeaky bum time for as long as we didn’t get a third, which was the whole game unfortunately but we dug in and saw out the game.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.92.17

Thread: 90337

Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:55:37, 159 views.

Bamber Bridge 3-1 Tadcaster Albion
Brighouse 0-2 Trafford
Clitheroe 2-2 Ossett Town
Colne 2-1 Kendal Town
Colwyn Bay 1-2 Droylsden
Goole 1-1 Radcliffe Borough
Glossop NE 2-3 Prescot Cables
Scarboro Ath 2-1 Ramsbottom Utd
Skelmersdale 2-1 Mossley
South Shields 3-1 Atherton Colleries

By my reckoning we overtake Glossop NE (who blew a 2 goal league today) and move back up to 3rd spot.
League leaders Bamber Bridge came from a goal down to beat Taddy.
Emile Sinclair scored in stoppage time to rescue a point for Ossett Town.

Edited on 04/11/17 at 17:08:59
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Amazing comeback for Cables. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 17:06:32, 101 views. In reply to 'Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North'

2-0 down away from home with only around fifteen minutes remaining - and they win 3-2!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.190.243.171

RE: Amazing comeback for Cables. by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 17:12:05, 108 views. In reply to 'Amazing comeback for Cables.'

We play Cables next week so that gives SK even more reason to bleat on about the first and last 10 mins.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Nice result, nice attendance. Well done Boro! Nt by Matt

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 17:45:13, 128 views. In reply to 'RE: Amazing comeback for Cables.'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.234.167

Thread: 90336

COME ON BORO, DON’T LET THIS GO! by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:33:45, 65 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.190.243.171

Thread: 90335

Second half Thread n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:06:15, 39 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

South Shields 1-1 ATHERTON COLLERIES (Matthews, 47′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:06:49, 37 views. In reply to 'Second half Thread n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Colwyn Bay 0-1 DROYLSDEN (Caddick, 48′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:08:13, 37 views. In reply to 'South Shields 1-1 ATHERTON COLLERIES (Matthews, 47′)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

BAMBER BRIDGE (Carsley, 51′) 1-1 Tadcaster by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:09:57, 40 views. In reply to 'Colwyn Bay 0-1 DROYLSDEN (Caddick, 48′)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Brighouse 0-2 TRAFFORD (Mason, 51′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:11:03, 37 views. In reply to 'BAMBER BRIDGE (Carsley, 51′) 1-1 Tadcaster'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

BAMBER BRIDGE (Carsley, 54′) 2-1 Tadcaster by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:12:47, 40 views. In reply to 'Brighouse 0-2 TRAFFORD (Mason, 51′)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Boro 2-1 RAMSBOTTOM UTD (Heaton, 57′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:15:05, 35 views. In reply to 'BAMBER BRIDGE (Carsley, 54′) 2-1 Tadcaster'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Skelmersdale 2-1 MOSSLEY (Henson, 57′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:16:37, 35 views. In reply to 'Boro 2-1 RAMSBOTTOM UTD (Heaton, 57′)'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 16:21:40
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Colne 1-1 KENDAL (Seear, 58′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:17:47, 36 views. In reply to 'Skelmersdale 2-1 MOSSLEY (Henson, 57′)'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 16:20:50
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

COLWYN BAY (Andrews, 58′) 1-1 Droylsden by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:18:34, 39 views. In reply to 'Colne 1-1 KENDAL (Seear, 58′)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

SOUTH SHIELDS (Robert Briggs, 58′) 2-1 Atherton Collieries by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:19:14, 42 views. In reply to 'COLWYN BAY (Andrews, 58′) 1-1 Droylsden'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 16:19:24
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Colwyn Bay 1-2 DROYLSDEN (Kilheeney, 62′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:22:40, 39 views. In reply to 'SOUTH SHIELDS (Robert Briggs, 58′) 2-1 Atherton Collieries '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

MISSED PEN! (Finnigan, South Shields) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:23:45, 37 views. In reply to 'Colwyn Bay 1-2 DROYLSDEN (Kilheeney, 62′)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Goole 1-1 RADCLIFFE BOROUGH (Hooper, 65′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:24:47, 39 views. In reply to 'MISSED PEN! (Finnigan, South Shields)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Attendance 953 n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:29:34, 44 views. In reply to 'Goole 1-1 RADCLIFFE BOROUGH (Hooper, 65′)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

73′ SUB for Boro: Price ON, Johnson OFF by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:31:16, 35 views. In reply to 'Attendance 953 n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

BAMBER BRIDGE (Linney 75′) 3-1 Tadcaster by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:32:53, 38 views. In reply to '73′ SUB for Boro: Price ON, Johnson OFF'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

GLOSSOP NE (Olowabi) 2-0 Prescot Cables by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:34:19, 38 views. In reply to 'BAMBER BRIDGE (Linney 75′) 3-1 Tadcaster '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Glossop NE 2-1 PRESCOT CABLES by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:39:57, 34 views. In reply to 'GLOSSOP NE (Olowabi) 2-0 Prescot Cables'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

82′ SUB for Boro: Logan ON, Beadle OFF by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:41:13, 39 views. In reply to 'Glossop NE 2-1 PRESCOT CABLES'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Glossop NE 2-2 PRESCOT CABLES by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:42:58, 37 views. In reply to '82′ SUB for Boro: Logan ON, Beadle OFF'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

COLNE (Miller) 2-1 Kendal Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:45:04, 39 views. In reply to 'Glossop NE 2-2 PRESCOT CABLES'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Glossop NE 2-3 PRESCOT CABLES by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:46:21, 39 views. In reply to 'COLNE (Miller) 2-1 Kendal Town'

Glossop in meltdown in the final minutes!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Clitheroe 2-2 OSSETT TOWN (Emile Sinclair) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:50:16, 42 views. In reply to 'Glossop NE 2-3 PRESCOT CABLES'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

SOUTH SHIELDS (Holmes, 90+3′) 3-1 Atherton Colleries by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:51:15, 39 views. In reply to 'Clitheroe 2-2 OSSETT TOWN (Emile Sinclair)'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 16:51:55
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

FT: Boro 2-1 Ramsbottom Utd by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 16:52:26, 38 views. In reply to 'SOUTH SHIELDS (Holmes, 90+3′) 3-1 Atherton Colleries'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Thread: 90334

Boro line-up today by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:05:19, 52 views.

1. Taylor
2. Johnson
3. Merris
4. Valentine
5. Stimpson
6. Hewitt
7. Dean
8. Daly
9. Curtis
10. Coulson
11. Wright

Subs: Price, Morgan, Beadle, Logan, Cadman

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Latest: GOOLE (C. Stewart) 1-0 Radcliffe Borough by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:06:47, 42 views. In reply to 'Boro line-up today'

Carl Stewart after just 15 seconds

Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:10:04
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

CLITHEROE (West, 10′) 1-0 Ossett Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:11:10, 31 views. In reply to 'Latest: GOOLE (C. Stewart) 1-0 Radcliffe Borough'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:11:39
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

COLNE (Curran, 11′) 1-0 Kendal Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:12:51, 35 views. In reply to 'CLITHEROE (West, 10′) 1-0 Ossett Town'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:13:40
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

BORO (Coulson, 15′) 1-0 Ramsbottom Utd by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:15:54, 35 views. In reply to 'COLNE (Curran, 11′) 1-0 Kendal Town'

Stunning free-kick by Coulson from about 25 yards out.

Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:22:01
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

CLITHEROE 2-0 Ossett Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:18:44, 29 views. In reply to 'BORO (Coulson, 15′) 1-0 Ramsbottom Utd'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Brighouse 0-1 TRAFFORD (Burns, 23′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:25:00, 36 views. In reply to 'CLITHEROE 2-0 Ossett Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

BORO (Max Wright, 27′) 2-0 Ramsbottom Utd by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:28:27, 34 views. In reply to 'Brighouse 0-1 TRAFFORD (Burns, 23′)'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:32:19
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Why is Wright’s Goal given as 20th minute by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:30:56, 46 views. In reply to 'BORO (Max Wright, 27′) 2-0 Ramsbottom Utd'

When it’s half past three? Was it a late kick-off?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.190.243.171

GLOSSOP NE (Chippendale, 31′) 1-0 Prescot Cables by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:31:28, 39 views. In reply to 'Why is Wright’s Goal given as 20th minute'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:34:23
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

RE: Why is Wright’s Goal given as 20th minute by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:36:15, 50 views. In reply to 'Why is Wright’s Goal given as 20th minute'

Typo - it was 27 mins not 20.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Clitheroe 2-1 OSSETT TOWN (A Peterson, 36′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:37:13, 31 views. In reply to 'RE: Why is Wright’s Goal given as 20th minute'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:38:26
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

37′ SUB for Boro: Beadle on for injured Curtis by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:39:02, 33 views. In reply to 'Clitheroe 2-1 OSSETT TOWN (A Peterson, 36′)'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:39:22
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Bamber Bridge 0-1 TADCASTER (T Corner, 38′) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:40:11, 30 views. In reply to '37′ SUB for Boro: Beadle on for injured Curtis'

League leaders go one down to a goal from Tom Corner.

Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:42:35
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

SOUTH SHIELDS (Briggs, 43′) 1-0 Atherton Colleries by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:43:31, 32 views. In reply to 'Bamber Bridge 0-1 TADCASTER (T Corner, 38′)'


Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:44:31
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

HT: Colwyn Bay 0-0 Droylsden by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:46:11, 37 views. In reply to 'SOUTH SHIELDS (Briggs, 43′) 1-0 Atherton Colleries'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

HT: Goole 1-0 Radcliffe Borough by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:47:41, 29 views. In reply to 'HT: Colwyn Bay 0-0 Droylsden'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

HT: South Shields 1-0 Atherton Colleries by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:48:17, 28 views. In reply to 'HT: Goole 1-0 Radcliffe Borough'

Att: 1,773

Edited on 04/11/17 at 15:50:34
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

HT: Boro 2-0 Ramsbottom Utd by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:48:44, 35 views. In reply to 'HT: South Shields 1-0 Atherton Colleries'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

HT: Bamber Bridge 0-1 Tadcaster Albion by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:49:06, 35 views. In reply to 'HT: Boro 2-0 Ramsbottom Utd'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

HT: Colne 1-0 Kendal Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:49:41, 30 views. In reply to 'HT: Bamber Bridge 0-1 Tadcaster Albion'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

HT: Clitheroe 2-1 Ossett Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:51:03, 31 views. In reply to 'HT: Colne 1-0 Kendal Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

HT: Skelmersdale 2-0 Mossley by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:51:45, 32 views. In reply to 'HT: Clitheroe 2-1 Ossett Town'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

HT: Glossop NE 1-0 Prescot Cables by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:53:52, 36 views. In reply to 'HT: Skelmersdale 2-0 Mossley'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

HT: Brighouse 0-1 Trafford by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:57:14, 29 views. In reply to 'HT: Glossop NE 1-0 Prescot Cables'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

Thread: 90333

Sea sea seasiders by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 12:58:10, 109 views.

Let’s do this today lads. Last season they scored in the first minute, Benny equalised for us in the 3rd and it went onto be a 3-2 win for us. Same again please Boro!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.88.216

Thread: 90332

Brodie by Joe90

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 12:28:54, 129 views.

Just wondering and SK desire for a goal scorer if Richard Brodie on the radar, close links to York and from the north east, he likes playing close to home by all accounts, that’s when his most prolific. South Sheilds would be ideal for him but would he struggle in their team? . Am not sure holding out for walshaw is going to be succesful…

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.236.43

RE: Brodie by Stuntpele

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 15:10:28, 83 views. In reply to 'Brodie'

Brodie already signed for another team. Rushall Olympic in division above us

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.40.57.157

Thread: 90331

BBC 2 by southerndog User: southerndog

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 19:07:07, 134 views.

Who’s watching? Can’t bring myself to watch it. Too painful!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.40.248.126

it’s gonna be emotional by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 19:16:05, 138 views. In reply to 'BBC 2'

but I’ll be watching it, I bet they show THOSE goals again though.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.94.202

Can’t watch i’m off to bed! by Seadogmatt

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 19:49:28, 113 views. In reply to 'it’s gonna be emotional'

Roll on tomorrow!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.129.179

RE: BBC 2 by Seasick seadog User: Seasick seadog

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 20:47:49, 137 views. In reply to 'BBC 2'

There losing 0-2

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.157.11

4-0 down by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 21:43:55, 100 views. In reply to 'RE: BBC 2'

but they’ve had their day in the “sun" or rather the floodlights.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.94.202

Hopefully all their winnings go on repairing the pitch! by Seadogmatt

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 21:46:25, 127 views. In reply to '4-0 down'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.129.179

RE: Hopefully all their winnings go on repairing the pitch! by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 10:16:41, 103 views. In reply to 'Hopefully all their winnings go on repairing the pitch!'

Overall the gulf in class told but I felt the 4-0 scoreline flattered MK Dons a little. With a bit of luck and better finishing from Hyde it could easily have been a very different scoreline.

We got a mention when Martin Keown said he watched our game against Hyde in the last round (and said Hyde did some desperate defending).

I can’t believe some moron home “fan" thought it would be a good idea to throw a flare onto an artificial pitch. What an absolute grade-A tool. At one point there seemed the possibility the match might not go ahead due to damage to the pitch but the ref deemed it playable. I think we should have a policy that if you get caught bringing a flare into the ground you face serious consequences (a very long ban?).

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

RE: RE: Hopefully all their winnings go on repairing the pitch! by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 10:20:53, 110 views. In reply to 'RE: Hopefully all their winnings go on repairing the pitch!'

Yes certainly anyone bringing a flare into the ground should be banned and anyone actually throwing one on the pitch should be made to pay for all the repairs that are deemed necessary after the reckless damage caused by it.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.88.216

Thread: 90330

Steve Kittrick on the speculation… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 14:29:34, 192 views.

http://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/kittrick-staying-put-at-boro-1-8839421

Edited by admin on 03/11/17 at 14:58:45
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.157.103

RE: Steve Kittrick on the speculation… by guy fawkes User: guy fawkes

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 16:46:10, 146 views. In reply to 'Steve Kittrick on the speculation…'

Yes, but we all know there’s no loyalty anywhere in football.

Today - staying - I’m here for the journey.
Tomorrow - gone - it’s an exciting project they’ve offered me

;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.207.7.143

RE: RE: Steve Kittrick on the speculation… by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 21:03:55, 153 views. In reply to 'RE: Steve Kittrick on the speculation…'

In which case, I declare that there has been no contact from Everton regarding their vacant managerial post.

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile."

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

Thread: 90329

Kittrick to leave for Boston? by Dazaster

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 09:10:10, 215 views.

Gets a mention in local paper and wanted job before.
http://www.bostonstandard.co.uk/sport/football/boston-united/who-wants-the-boston-united-job-with-the-deadline-approaching-we-look-at-some-of-the-gaffers-who-may-be-interested-in-taking-over-at-york-street-1-8227655

Edited by admin on 03/11/17 at 09:15:04
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.221.67.217

God I hope not… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 09:17:28, 169 views. In reply to 'Kittrick to leave for Boston?'

The last thing we need right now is something unsettling like that. Hopefully if they’ve been “inundated" with applications, it will reduce the chances of it being him, but still, it’s a concern.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.94.202

Funny one by Dazaster

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 09:29:46, 154 views. In reply to 'God I hope not…'

United are in a bit of trouble in league, a new ground is due be built, but the crowds are only a few above boro’s. I belive when they train its not in Boston but closer to A1 area to try attract better players.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.221.67.217

RE: Funny one by Boro345

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 13:07:37, 142 views. In reply to 'Funny one'

Shows the lack of respect he has for the club not the first job he’s tried to apply for while being here either

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.107.236.152

RE: RE: Funny one by Seadogmatt

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 13:33:37, 149 views. In reply to 'RE: Funny one'

Doesn’t say he has applied. Jumping the gun there. Managers being linked to other clubs is part of the game. I hope he wants to see at least this season through with us and achieve his objective.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.129.179

Hang on by Joe90

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 13:46:52, 143 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Funny one'

I have applied for many jobs while currently employed it’s career progression… he wants to manage at higher levels in the same way players do… last year people wanted him out, I have always backed him because his very self centered and focused on what he wants, nothing wrong with that… Neil Warnock was just the same he used us as a stepping stone for better things…am not saying SK is NW btw. Merely an example of a man who knows what he wants and is determined to get there and confident in his ability

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.126.150.200

RE: Hang on by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 14:06:19, 147 views. In reply to 'Hang on'

Quite right - look four threads down and you have fans openly speculating about Steve’s future… rock and a hard place much?

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile."

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 152.71.38.192

RE: RE: Hang on by Boro345

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 14:20:18, 129 views. In reply to 'RE: Hang on'

Respect your opinion and understand what your saying but have to question his commitment levels and whether he actually wants to be at the club, cause I know if I was happy in a job I wouldn’t be letting my availability be known to other clubs chairman

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.107.236.152

But you don’t know that by Joe90

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 15:44:12, 155 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Hang on'

I attend many work exhibitions and get to talk with lots of competitors and potential future employers, it does t mean I want to work for them, the fact he goes watching games also tells me his doing a thorough job…. this isn’t the premiership, when has loyalty played any part in football, the days of kissing badges and actually meaning something are long gone..I can see it with the local lads playing for boro right now but there in the minority

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.126.150.200

more wedge 2 divisions higher by realist

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 22:17:34, 143 views. In reply to 'But you don’t know that'

Why wouldn’t he ?

If we had got off to a bad start we would have got rid of him, thats the world of football.

Don’t even mention loyalty, remember Rudi !!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.4.25.12

RE:more wedge 2 divisions higher by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 23:11:38, 129 views. In reply to 'more wedge 2 divisions higher '

In defence of Rudy, it wasn’t lack of loyalty. Without wanting to go into detail, he was not treated correctly and I believe he misses the club.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.150.171.183

RE: RE:more wedge 2 divisions higher by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 23:33:43, 129 views. In reply to 'RE:more wedge 2 divisions higher'

He’s obviously fond of us still judging by the mentions of us in this;

https://youtu.be/MBI9OKnPp70

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.42.101.36

RE: RE: RE:more wedge 2 divisions higher by che…

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 10:06:31, 109 views. In reply to 'RE: RE:more wedge 2 divisions higher'

He’s employed in one of the most volatile job markets in the country. Could be out of his job by Christmas with a run of defeats. There isn’t anyone in the country who wouldn’t look for better pay and working conditions and it’s naive to think otherwise. He’s an employee not a fan. He’s committed under the terms of his contract only. Our committment, as fans, isn’t based on anything logical like pay…working conditions…securing the best for your family. How far do you travel to work? Exactly. He’s doing a job and doing it well. Needs cutting some slack or the chuntering risks getting in the way of a promising season. UTB

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.121.7.184

RE: RE: RE: RE:more wedge 2 divisions higher by Revd Up

Posted: 4/11/2017 at 11:43:20, 99 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE:more wedge 2 divisions higher'

Well said Che sensible answer.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 78.147.198.243

Thread: 90328

Reasons for optimism. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 2/11/2017 at 20:46:27, 155 views.

Some supporters have recently slated Boro’s recent dropped points. However, we need to remember how far this club has come in just ten years.

In 2007, the newly formed Athletic were kicking the ball around at Hunmanby on a roadside field in the pouring rain without a ground to call home following the old club’s demise that spring.

Since then, we’ve come such a long way: drab games against little heard of teams with names like “Miners’ Welfare” have been replaced by much more exciting ties in front of large crowds of over 2,000 at times as opposed to a meagre 300 or so for some evening fixtures at Queensgate. Moreover, we’ve secured a number of emphatic promotions, not least the season in which we beat Brighouse 2-0 to go up on the day.

We may slip up from time to time. Every club does. Nevertheless, only two league reverses so far this season, a top three placing and a significant F.A. Cup run suggest this is a club on the ascendency for which we should be wholly proud.

Aylesbury Seadog - Supporting the Seadogs since 1995.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.191.76.216

Good post Aylesbury by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 2/11/2017 at 21:06:35, 117 views. In reply to 'Reasons for optimism.'


PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.150.171.183

In general terms…. by che…

Posted: 3/11/2017 at 08:20:36, 114 views. In reply to 'Good post Aylesbury'

….since our rebirth pretty much every supporter through the turnstile, based on the average attendance, would likely also to be a co-owner.

Now based on average attendance/co-owner numbers that will be about a 50/50 split. Fair to say that?

Don’t have to be a co-owner but maybe those for are *just* supporters don’t yet have that same understanding of what the club is all about. We are the sugar daddies. We are the board. We are the volunteers…that make this club work and exist.

You have the right to rock up pay your tenner and have a moan, constructively. Opinions and input much more credible if you’re a co-owner though

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.121.7.206

Thread: 90327

GLOSSOP v BORO video online NOW by Old Git

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 18:08:48, 97 views.

Hazy, Lazy & Crazy films present
evidence of last night’s crime
in ‘Just Another Cruddy Video’
hot off the PC
You only get Boro’s goal and even in slow mo it goes in a blur
although you do see the ball hit the net & come out.
Didn’t get either of Glossop goals but you do get to see
the action leading up to them and you get to hear the cheers of Glossop fans.
For some reason, in both cases, I stopped the camera.
I watched the goals go in by looking over the top of the
camera but that does YOU no good.
However you do get the penalty shout,at normal speed, in slow mo
and again at normal speed. So you can decide if it was or wasn’t a pen.
Either way it makes no difference now. You also get to see us hit the post
in the first half, the accurate position of the keeper picking up the back pass
to compare with the position of the ball for the free kick and the opportunity
to watch the free kick head off in the general direction of Manchester.
All filmed through night vision goggles, apparently.
So enjoy at this link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqYyZOah_cQ

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.192.181

Just a mention that by Old Git

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 19:08:49, 123 views. In reply to 'GLOSSOP v BORO video online NOW'

last night on the way back from Glossop
I dropped my phone on the floor of the coach.
As I have regularly left my camera on the coach
I checked all my pockets and I still had my camera, so ok.
I forgot that I had my phone and at around midnight after
a long day my brain was too tired to remember my phone
but at least my other passenger heard it drop on the floor
but when he asked me about it I said I was ok, I had my camera.
The phone isn’t an expensive smart phone it’s just a grotty, cheap
Alcatel phone with a black case, it’s about 4 inches long
and about 1 and a half inches wide it ain’t worth much but
it contains my phone links with friends going back 20 years
so I’d really like to get it back. If anyone found it can they
hand it over to Ken at the next home game.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.192.181

Still tired by Old Git

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 19:21:57, 91 views. In reply to 'Just a mention that'

that should be ‘another’ passenger heard it

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.192.181

Thread: 90326

Match report from Glossop loss by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 09:38:16, 91 views.

http://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/late-strike-kills-boro-hopes-1-8834406

Edited by admin on 01/11/17 at 09:48:05
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 217.135.43.196

Thread: 90325

Tonight by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 01:38:43, 192 views.

One of those nights. It could have gone either way. Two teams fighting for play off berths; no more than that barring a huge run.

Still struggling to work out our tactics. If only we found a way to use the full width of the pitch; rather than relying totally on Max Wright down the right. Who is out left? Do we need a change in formation to spread the play?

Slightly unlucky on a couple of occasions tonight; but Glossop could no doubt argue the same.

In short, my hunch: We’ll end up in the playoffs. SK will live or die on how they go.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 212.2.18.98

RE: Tonight by Athletico seadog

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 09:48:17, 137 views. In reply to 'Tonight '

Was not at the game tonight, was at work, first one i have missed for a while and sounds pretty much the same story as the last month. Agree with last statement we are play offs at best despite having a better team/squad than last yr, though the squad is getting thin. SK says whoever finishes close to south shields will get promoted. I say whoever finishes above Hyde will get promoted. South Shields will win the league & Hyde probably 2nd best atm. We need to finish above them otherwise its the play off lottery again. Fully behind the players but improvements do need to be made. Jimmy is a midfielder he sprayed the ball around lovely in pre season and with coulo and max out wide that would work well. A striker is a must and something needs to change at the back. Another experienced defender needs bringing in or play all 3 cbs Turnbull,Hewitt,Stimpson together.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.243.228

Last night by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 09:50:13, 132 views. In reply to 'Tonight '

On balance, I thought we were unlucky to not come away with something. We had the best chances, we battled well against a churlish, aggressive side and we never gave up. Lady Luck just chose the opposition last night. I know points make prizes, but at least we showed grit and determination. On another night the result could have been reversed.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.224.9.230

RE: Last night by Boro345

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 09:56:00, 130 views. In reply to 'Last night'

I thought at times we played some good stuff, didn’t really test there keeper enough and put him under pressure from crosses as he was only short, for the majority of the game we defended well but again a silly defensive error when he should of just hoofed it into the road next to the ground, these mistakes are costing us points. Onto Saturday now hopefully back to winning ways

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.205.252.248

RE: Last night by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 10:00:37, 114 views. In reply to 'Last night'

I wasn’t there unfortunately, and from the comments on here, twitter and facebook it really does prove what a game of contrasting opinions football can be. I’ve seen comments ranging from us being the “Better side", to there being “not much in it", to us being ‘woeful/shite’, and even the odd comment for SK to go (!!) although I think in fairness they were from people with a downer on him from the start.

The point we have to bear in mind is it was our first away defeat all season, not bad considering it was our 7th league game, and a team who just don’t lose at home (they barely did last season either). We’re the top scorers in the league and this is despite losing strikers for various reasons, and you can bet your bottom dollar SK will know about it and be looking to bring players in as and when they can improve the squad. We’re still on course for mid to high 80s, if we carry on in this vein so basically it’s all good (to quote Ian Fletcher)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.140

Poor finishing let us down. by Old Git

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 10:18:24, 134 views. In reply to 'RE: Last night'

Apart from that we created more chances than Glossop
We sould have edged ahead from 1-1 but threw away those opportunities
and a sucker punch finished us off.
In between those third half of the pitch chances
there was lots of dire attempts at passing and abysmal attempts to judge the flight
and bounce of the ball that must have had SK fuming.
But we should have won, sadly we weren’t outplayed in the crap-passing department
but we were left to rue missed chances and no points
against a side who weren’t better than us.

The first goal we gifted them by not booting the ball out and
instead tried to let it run out of play while being challenged by two opponents.
Just like we did against Ossett in the playoffs and like Matty Turnbull
did at the swimming pool end against South Shields in the league game.

Glossop’s second came from a poor tackle on the edge of our box
which gifted them the free kick from which they went on to score from after
our defenders missed 3 chances to clear the ball
In between Michael Coulson scored another good goal.
Controlling the ball as it came through a bunch of players in the box,
turning quickly in a small space and smashing it into the net

As for the penalty, yes it touched his hand but was it deliberate, the ball dropped over his head,
down his front onto his hand and down to the ground. It was that quick.
I doubt any ref would give that and can see why the lino who was stood about 5 yards away,
under a floodlight, didn’t flag for it. It was one of those we would have liked to have had
but gone ape-shit about if it was against us.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.192.181

bit gone missing there by Old Git

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 10:30:30, 128 views. In reply to 'Poor finishing let us down.'

title should have read ‘poor finishing & poor defending let us down’

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.192.181

Fine margins by Cynic

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 10:50:37, 122 views. In reply to 'bit gone missing there'

It’s a fine margin sometimes between winning, drawing and losing. On saturday nobody could have complained that 4-0 (or something similar) wouldn’t have been a fair result, yet with 5 mins to go Colne were pressing for an equaliser and almost got one.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 193.240.172.42

Re fine margins by Steve0337

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 11:28:43, 122 views. In reply to 'Fine margins'

I was there last night..I am sorry but I will say it as I saw it..No centre forward..Jimmy is a midfield player, and a very good one..Somebody please tell the manager this..The midfield is not as good as they think they are..The defence cannot defend a set piece..
We have played some lower division sides, hence our very good start to the season. The better sides have done a job on us..I do not include Glossop in the good side category either.
Fine margins my arse..We are not a top two side..Play offs yes..
Changes are a must..We need a right back, a centre half and a centre forward asap..Also a midfield general..Sorry to be so negative..SK will need to get his finger out asap..And yes I know that we have only lost 2 in the league..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.164.96

Just a question by Cynic

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 12:00:40, 125 views. In reply to 'Re fine margins'

Was there anything inaccurate in my post Steve? BTW I wasn’t commenting on last night’s game as I wasn’t there. Just making a point.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 193.240.172.42

Did quite well last night. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 12:47:23, 136 views. In reply to 'Just a question'

I’m reasonably happy with last night’s game. It sounds as though Boro we’re simply unlucky. We piled the pressure on for long periods, particularly in the second half, and equalised immediately the first time they scored. This proves the lads’ refusal to give up and is very different to previous seasons when we caved in easily.

We’ve simply been unlucky in recent games. At Kendal we should have had a penalty to go 3-1 in front and last night was a sucker punch really. We beat Colne convincingly last week and humiliated Whitby recently in the cup. There’s so much talent in our squad in players like Coulson and Curtis to name just a few, and over the coming weeks we’ll get the composure to book our place in the premier division next season.

OnwRds and upwards Boro!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.191.76.216

Last night… by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 13:03:29, 163 views. In reply to 'Did quite well last night.'

There seems to be one major factor for last night (and possibly Kendal, wasn’t there, don’t know), and that’s the pitch.

It’s alright wanting to play passing football, but on that kind of surface it simply isn’t possible. It didn’t look great from the sidelines, but the telling sign for me was that Coulo took 15-20 minutes to adapt to it, he tried a few passes that didn’t work, then he passing in the air rather than on the pitch, which means you need a better touch to receive it.

Naturally, we revert to the balls over the top. It’s not pretty, but it does make sense. Jimmy clearly isn’t back to fitness, he wasn’t getting around the pitch like he normally would, and a fit Curtis or Logan would have done a much better job first half IMO.

Speaking of Curtis - I’ve read elsewhere complaints about not having a settled front line. I’m not sure we can blame SK for this, when players have suffered from injuries, been unavailable etc. Curtis went off on Saturday, (when Logan was unavailable) so things had to change.

As Mrs Trellis mentions occasionally, the problem with our long balls isn’t that their long, it’s that they’re looping, easy to read and easy to clear for the big defenders. We need to be more intelligent and not just hoof it forward.

Disappointed with the result last night, but we were on top for long periods, without finishing chances. It could have gone either way. There’s plenty to improve on, but I’m not sure some of the doom and gloom is particularly warranted. We’re better than we were at this time last season, and a damn sight better than the year before.

Also, think it’s worth remembering that we beat Workington and Whitby from the league above, so I’m not necessarily convinced we always struggle against the better teams.

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.133.97.189

RE: Last night… by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 21:11:44, 150 views. In reply to 'Last night…'

And Stratford.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

Thread: 90324

Steve Kittrick on the loss at Glossop by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 00:53:58, 123 views.

http://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-steve-kittrick-after-the-loss-at-glossop-1-8834098

Edited by admin on 01/11/17 at 08:44:56
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.157.103

A further chat with Steve K after the Glossop defeat by club.comms User: club.comms

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 13:37:31, 161 views. In reply to 'Steve Kittrick on the loss at Glossop'

https://soundcloud.com/scarborough-athletic/steve-kittrick-reacts-to-the-2-1-defeat-to-glossop-north-end

Edited by admin on 01/11/17 at 15:37:25
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.4.156.106

Thread: 90323

Not good enough by James head

Posted: 31/10/2017 at 23:27:16, 188 views.

Not going anywhere under kittrick. The money your throwing at players this/last season you should be running away with the league. Never has a settled squad and think you can sign everyone’s best players. Deluded fans.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.249.248.213

YOU? by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 31/10/2017 at 23:32:08, 149 views. In reply to 'Not good enough '

Who do you support?

I agree that our budget is ten times better than South Shields, but YOU?!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.92.249

Agree with Fed to be honest. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 10:14:24, 135 views. In reply to 'Not good enough '

If that had been South Shields last night they’d have won 3-2, because they have proven strikers like Finnigan et al., whereas we’re always chopping and changing and like Fed says always unsettled as a result. Like many people are saying, it’s very worrying that we’re not getting good results against sides in the top five - these are sides that if we get a play-off place we’ll have to beat. However, if we sack Kittrick who else could do a better job?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.191.76.216

RE: Agree with Fed to be honest. by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 12:58:39, 129 views. In reply to 'Agree with Fed to be honest.'

“If we sack kittrick”

You’re having a laugh, right?

Why are there people expecting to win every game and talk about kittrick’s sacking each time we don’t? Where were these people in the 2015-16 season? THAT’S what a bad season looks like

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.69.144.159

RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest. by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 13:08:13, 122 views. In reply to 'RE: Agree with Fed to be honest.'

Totally misread your post Aylesbury, oops sorry :)

Point still stands though, draw or lose and there’ll be someone suggesting a change of manager as if Scarborough Athletic have to win every game

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.69.144.159

RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest. by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 17:14:03, 108 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest.'

Tbh, with the resources we have we should be beating teams like Glossop. Without disrespecting them, I honestly thought we should have least got a point or a win. The same as we should have beaten Kendal. It’s plain to see that we need a striker, as we don’t obviously score enough goals!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.159.51.10

RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest. by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 17:28:00, 107 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest.'

Not disagreeing that we need to strengthen the squad with an extra striker, but it isn’t true that “we don’t obviously score enough goals", as we are currently the top scorers!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.140

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest. by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 19:48:24, 101 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest.'

Yeah I didn’t proof read! I think we don’t score enough goals compared to the chances created. At Kendal, we should have been 4 up by half time. Also, we don’t score enough against the decent teams in the league. Look at Hyde, Glossop and South Shields - they are clinical. We need to be more clinical in front of goal and a 30 goal a season striker would help! Our top goal scorer is a winger! A very good winger at that!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.159.51.10

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest. by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 19:55:14, 102 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest.'

Like someone else said the other week, it’s a big pity that Carl Stewart didn’t show the commitment to stick with it, because he would be sticking the chances we create away for fun.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.140

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest. by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 19:51:37, 103 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest.'

Yes and Coulson has scored 17 goals before we even got into November

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.69.144.147

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest. by Athletico seadog

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 20:54:30, 99 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest.'

Not been funny but to me if we have a winger on 17 goals prior to november and we have dropped points that we have would possibly support we are a 1 man team.? Par valentine who has played cm or rb how many goals have the men up top in the middle scored in the league shall we say? Sinclair, Osborne, Logan, Beadle, Curtis, Clarkson, all those lads have appeared up top. Not knocking those players as most have not consistently played due to various reasons but most top goalscorers are from up top as opposed to wingers/non central players.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.136.189.73

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest. by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 2/11/2017 at 13:22:25, 111 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree with Fed to be honest.'

This is semantics really, isn’t it. Isn’t kittrick playing a 4-3-3 with 3 forwards - one centrally and Coulson and Wright on either side? Personally I don’t care which one of our 3 forwards get 17 goals before November, that’s a damn good return however way you look at it. If Logan or whoever is used as a big target man for the other 2 to receive his knock downs then I don’t care however many goals the central forward gets

Also, a one man team? Well how many other players in our team was a regular at league 2 level a year and a half ago, and playing at Scottish premier level last season? How many from any team at this level, I might add. We build a team around him - no shit Sherlock

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.69.144.147

Can’t believe nobody’s asked this yet? by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 21:10:22, 131 views. In reply to 'RE: Agree with Fed to be honest.'

Who’s Fed?

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

James Head could be fan nicknamed Fed. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 21:22:12, 105 views. In reply to 'Can’t believe nobody’s asked this yet?'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.191.76.216

RE: James Head could be fan nicknamed Fed. by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 1/11/2017 at 21:28:55, 116 views. In reply to 'James Head could be fan nicknamed Fed.'

Referring to the club and fans as “you" and “your"…not sure he classes himself as one of us tbh!

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

Thread: 90322

Anyway Prescot lost their Trophy replay… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 31/10/2017 at 23:19:50, 61 views.

so we don’t need to worry about our league game there being postponed.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.92.249
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.