Newest Message: Twitter but not Facebook /t by MAl cD on 19/1/2018, 21:00:45 - View Thread

39

Thread: 90630

Coulo, Coulo Coulo, Coulo Coulo, Coulo, MICHAEL COULSON! by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 27/12/2017 at 09:47:50, 157 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Jimmy, Jimmy Jimmy, Jimmy Jimmy, Jimmy, JIMMY BEADLE! by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 27/12/2017 at 10:37:27, 145 views. In reply to 'Coulo, Coulo Coulo, Coulo Coulo, Coulo, MICHAEL COULSON!'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.238

Thread: 90629

Thought the red had a good game yesterday by Taylor.

Posted: 27/12/2017 at 09:36:29, 182 views.

Don’t think he fell for any of there players diving and going to ground any chance they had. You can see why they get so many pens etc at home. Did they bring many fans yesterday? don’t remember seeing any. Anyway we’ll done Boro 3 more points in the bag, look forward now to Saturday and hopefully 3 more points.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 217.42.163.107

Taddy fans by Cynic

Posted: 27/12/2017 at 10:13:57, 156 views. In reply to 'Thought the red had a good game yesterday '

There was a handful stood next to us at the bottom corner by the Swimming pool turnstiles. Could have been others elsewhere obviously.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.74.124.175

RE: Thought the red had a good game yesterday by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 27/12/2017 at 10:36:50, 136 views. In reply to 'Thought the red had a good game yesterday '

Yes I was a bit worried when I noticed he was the same ref who’d sent off Max, but he seemed to be back to his usual self yesterday thankfully.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.238

Thread: 90628

Really excellent today. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 21:00:24, 185 views.

We really bounced back in style today after Saturday’s disappointing setback.

Once Coulson scored our opener, apart from Tadcaster’s missed “sitter”, we always looked like the better team.

In the second period, it became one-way traffic with our Second effectively killing the visitors off.

The crowd behind the goal opposite the swimming pool end were very vocal. Santa was even in attendance, helping cheer Boro to an essential victory.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.166.40.219

Thread: 90627

Golden gamble by Tim Lazenby

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 19:26:12, 130 views.

Didn’t hear today , What was the golden gamble number today and how much , thanks

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.165.203

RE:Golden gamble by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 19:51:59, 94 views. In reply to 'Golden gamble '

Can’t remember number but it was claimed. Around £166 I believe.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

10273 by Gamblegirl

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 23:43:08, 71 views. In reply to 'RE:Golden gamble '

was the number and the £166 was claimed

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.52.182.100

Thread: 90626

Little to say today? by old seadog User: old seadog

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 17:59:53, 204 views.

We destroyed them!
Brilliant all round performance!
..but it counts for nothing unless we do it again on Saturday

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.98.114.126

in fairness, they’re all… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 18:20:35, 186 views. In reply to 'Little to say today?'

in the pub, getting pissed ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.238

In the pub by Danae69

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 23:48:56, 150 views. In reply to 'in fairness, they’re all…'

I was one of the hundred people in the bar getting pissed.tried to see the game with my wife but every where we looked was obstructed by the front row.brought our friends from Manchester and we couldn’t see a thing so went to the bar .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.195.242.30

MoM today by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 18:22:10, 188 views. In reply to 'Little to say today?'

My mate asked me who I thought should be mom & to be honest I struggled because just about to a man they all played well. Awarded to Dave Merris & I wouldn’t argue. Well played as a team & made Taddy look very ordinary although if they’d have had some shooting boots on, could maybe have had a couple and certainly one when it looked harder to miss.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

MoM by Revd Up

Posted: 27/12/2017 at 21:18:33, 95 views. In reply to 'MoM today'

Short straw between Dave Merris and Cadman,both were brilliant.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.29.131.226

Thread: 90625

What an atmosphere today by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 17:25:25, 197 views.

We sang our hearts out for the lads and the lads responded in kind. I think that’s our biggest win against Taddy since 2009. We sure bounced back from Saturday in style.

Now we need to continue the good work in the next game!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.238

RE: What an atmosphere today by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 19:53:21, 158 views. In reply to 'What an atmosphere today'

True. The shed was brilliant today all through the match. Well done all of you.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

Thread: 90624

Full-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 16:10:03, 222 views.

Bamber Bridge P-P Skelmersdale Utd

Brighouse Town (Johnson) 1-3 Ossett Town (Yates, Hancock, Assenso) Att 178

Colne 0-6 Clitheroe (West 2, Carroll, Newby 2, Willoughby, pen) Att 285

Droylsden P-P Hyde Utd

Glossop NE (Deegan) 1-0 Mossley Att 486

Kendal Town (Lynch) 1-1 South Shields (Richardson) Att 517

Ossett Albion (Mbeka) 1-1 Goole (Allott) Att 196

Prescot Cables (Almond 2, Dean) 3-1 Colwyn Bay (Barnes) Att 353

Ramsbottom Utd P-P Atherton Collieries

Scarborough Athletic (Coulson, Valentine, Walshaw) 3-0 Tadcaster Albion Att 1,377

Trafford (Derbyshire, Mason, Summerskill) 3-0 Radcliffe Borough Att 307

Boro stay in 5th spot but draw level on points with Hyde and open up a gap of 5 points to 6th placed Droylsden.

Edited on 26/12/17 at 17:11:05
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Thread: 90623

Half-Time Scores in Evo-Stik North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 15:11:54, 123 views.

Bamber Bridge P-P Skelmersdale Utd
Brighouse Town (Johnson) 1-1 Ossett Town (Yates)
Colne 0-1 Clitheroe (West)
Droylsden P-P Hyde Utd
Glossop NE 0-0 Mossley
Kendal Town (Lynch) 1-1 South Shields (Richardson)
Ossett Albion (Mbeka) 1-0 Goole
Prescot Cables (Almond 2) 2-1 Colwyn Bay (Barnes)
Ramsbottom Utd P-P Atherton Collieries
Scarborough Athletic (Coulson) 1-0 Tadcaster Albion
Trafford (Derbyshire) 1-0 Radcliffe Borough

Edited on 26/12/17 at 16:09:04
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Thread: 90622

Boro line-up today by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 14:59:54, 94 views.

1. Tom Taylor
2. Sam Hewitt
3. Dave Merris (C)
4. Nathan Valentine
5. Danny Stimpson
6. Bailey Gooda
7. James Cadman
8. Luke Dean
9. James Walshaw
10. Michael Coulson
11. Max Wright

Subs: Jimmy Beadle, Tom Morgan, Lewis Sugden, Jack Johnson, Nathan Curtis.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Thread: 90621

Some matches off today in our league by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 12:04:45, 106 views.

Bamber Bridge v Skelmersdale Utd
Ramsbottom Utd v Atherton Colls

Both due to waterlogged pitches.

Colne v Clitheroe also might be off yet (inspection at 12.30).

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

RE: Some matches off today in our league by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 12:53:53, 99 views. In reply to 'Some matches off today in our league'

Also Droylsden v Hyde Utd is now off too - waterlogged pitch.
Colne v Clitheroe confirmed as definitely on.

Edited on 26/12/17 at 12:59:47
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Really can’t understand why… by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 22:24:51, 95 views. In reply to 'RE: Some matches off today in our league'

There’s been so many match postponements across our league this season, as it seems to have been a particularly dry autumn and early winter this year. Hardly comparable with, say, 2000 or 2007 when we had heavy rain practically on a daily basis.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.166.40.219

Thread: 90620

re prediction competition by kasey

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 11:19:42, 51 views.

Scarborough 3 Taddy 1
att 1066

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.140.118

RE: re prediction competition by Dunno

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 11:30:16, 51 views. In reply to 're prediction competition'

I think Malton said he was going away so no prediction comp this match, but just in case I’m wrong as usual…

Boro 5 - 1 Tadcaster with Dave Merris sent off in second half.

Att - 2,000+ with people locked out.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.192.73

Thread: 90619

Terracing? by Seadogmatt

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 09:11:36, 169 views.

Is the extra terracing up? Debating whether to bring my son or not. Looking forward to the game hopefully a big turnout!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.140.246

RE: Terracing? by AytonSAFC User: AytonSAFC

Posted: 26/12/2017 at 10:45:31, 117 views. In reply to 'Terracing?'

No it’s been announced that longer term solutions are being planned for.

Just get there a bit earlier and always room at the front or being the goal :)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.145.184.102

Thread: 90617

Formation by Dogsea

Posted: 25/12/2017 at 12:42:36, 150 views.

Agree with others. Good squad of players not playing in a formation that suits them. Either back to basics of 442 or maybe 352 would suit us. The current one hasn’t really worked for me. We’ve good players so win games but the better sides are more organised and in a shape that protects first then let’s them play. We edge out poor sides and get beat by better sides. Be solid and hard to beat then create and our better players will make things happen. Still think a slight tweak and we could be away. The three up front isn’t working despite them all been fantastic players.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 143.159.144.195

Thread: 90616

Merry Christmas to all Seadogs by MAlcD

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 23:52:50, 81 views.

Have a great one, and let’s hope for a successful season culminating in promotion.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.24.102.19

Happy christmas seadogs! by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 25/12/2017 at 15:08:39, 63 views. In reply to 'Merry Christmas to all Seadogs'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.42.101.36

Thread: 90615

Merry Christmas to all Seadogs.. by Dunno

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 16:30:58, 91 views.

You never know, this time next year we could be talking about a Boxing Day derby with Whitby or York City.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.192.73

RE: Merry Christmas to all Seadogs.. by guy fawkes in Mauritius User: guy fawkes

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 20:07:50, 94 views. In reply to 'Merry Christmas to all Seadogs..'

And, at 12.05 am here, very best wishes to everyone involved with the club.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 41.212.130.198

Thread: 90614

Jimmy Beadle interview on the Tadcaster game and the season by club.comms User: club.comms

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 14:42:07, 99 views.

http://scarboroughathletic.com/news/2017-12-23/beadle-ready

Edited by admin on 24/12/17 at 14:52:48
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.40.249.146

Thread: 90613

Unacceptable, Kittrick! by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 10:27:55, 223 views.

To me, yesterday’s shambolic result is “the writing on the wall” for our season.

We have consistently. Consistently. Failed to beat teams in the top six, including Hyde United and South Shields. Furthermore, even when we have defeated sides from near the bottom it’s usually been by a very small margin, such as a few weeks ago against Atherton Collieries when we scraped a 1-0 win. This all in spite of huge amounts of investment by Kittrick.

Other teams don’t mess up. Recently, South Shields came back “from the death” to earn three points at Mossley having been 2-1 down until the dying moments of the game when they scored twice in a few dramatic minutes. Had South Shields been trailing at Hyde United yesterday - they would have gone out all guns blazing in the second-half and finished their opponents off swiftly with a one-man advantage. Significantly, our inability to do so shows incredible weakness and, I’m afraid, suggests that we’re simply not good enough to gain promotion this season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.166.40.219

“other teams don’t mess up” by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 10:43:21, 178 views. In reply to 'Unacceptable, Kittrick!'

South Shields yesterday could only draw at home to Trafford, the same result as we got.

Hyde lost at Clitheroe, where we won 4-0.

Bamber Bridge lost at home to Ramsbottom.

Inconsistent Trafford won 4-0 one week and lost 6-1 the next.

I agree that we need to improve our record against fellow promotion contenders, and that it’s not good enough. But I refuse to believe that yesterday’s result was the “writing on the wall". We all know there will be lots of twists and turns in the promotion race between now and April. Look at last season’s barmy ending to the season.

Our home record is now very good, I think we’ve won 6 and drawn 1 of the last 7 home league games. Home games against Prescot, Bamber Bridge, Droylsden and the like will be vital, hopefully we can finally win some “six pointers". I think you’re right, we’ve not actually won such a game since the Glossop game in March.

Even if we do “only" make the play-offs, if we can do so in third it would mean that I don’t think we should fear anyone at home (other than Hyde). Up the Boro and Merry Christmas!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.85

Our record against the current top 10 by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 10:50:53, 152 views. In reply to '“other teams don’t mess up”'

Played 7
Won 1
Drawn 2
Lost 4

Scored 9
Conceded 12

Points 5 (from a possible 21)

Whilst I think the original post was slightly overdramatic, our performances against the top sides does not fill me with the same confidence that SK has that we’ll “be where we need to be”.

Will we make the playoffs? Yes, comfortably in my opinion.
Will we finish second? I’m not convinced we’ll be within 10 points of Hyde.

If SK gets us up through playoffs finishing 6th I’ll be delighted.

Edited on 24/12/17 at 10:51:50
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Fair enough Malton Seadog… by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 15:26:41, 136 views. In reply to 'Our record against the current top 10'

But how do you lot expect us to “comfortably” gain a promotion place if, as you said, we’re not picking up points against the top ten sides? These are the very teams you have to beat.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.166.40.219

RE: Fair enough Malton Seadog… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 15:36:30, 106 views. In reply to 'Fair enough Malton Seadog…'

I see your point in a way, but surely the way to ensure at least a play-off place is to pick up as many points as possible in total to get there. If the majority are from bottom half of the table sides (and in some cases, like Ossett Town & Mossley, only bottom half cos we put them there), it’s not really an issue. At least so far we’ve avoided the ’stinkers’ against lower half teams (Radcliffe Home/Burscough away). We’re still picking up 2 points a game which is more than we ended up with last season.

On a purely points per game basis, if the top 6 carried on as they are, (which they won’t obviously) it would finish

1. South Shields…109 pts
2. Hyde…91 pts
3. Bamber Bridge…88 pts.
4. Boro…84 pts
5. Drolysden….79 pts
6. Prescot…76 pts.

If we were to get 84 and finish 4th it would be remarkably unlucky but you make your own luck in football so they say.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.85

Unacceptable…Kittrick. by Steve 0337

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 11:50:33, 151 views. In reply to 'Unacceptable, Kittrick!'

I agree with much of this post, as I do with 365 and Malton’s post. It was always going to be a tough job yesterday.
I was there and they were a much better side. Yes we battled hard in the second half and maybe deserved a second goal.But 3.1 was a fair reflection of the game in my eyes.
On the day only Taylor and Cadman shone for us. Their back four was superb. Far better than ours. I would gladly swap ours for theirs.
Midfield needs a real shake up..They work hard but with the exception of Cadman produce little.
The front lads were playing on scraps so it was difficult to jude tgeir performance. Curtis took his goal very well.
So, we cannot beat teams around us. That, to date is a fact. We do struggle to put other so called lesser teams away..Again fact..We are a decent side, of that we all agree. But we are some way from being an automatic promotion winning side.
It is muted that we have difficulty getting players to come to Scarborough because of the geography of our location?..That maybe so. But the truth of the matter is some of the present crop are not good enough to take us to the next level. I suppose the only answer to this would be to pay more in order to get better players in..Not easy, I agree, but if something does not happen soon then the best that we can hope for is a play off spot. I for one am becoming a tad frustrated by the managers excuses.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 89.241.55.33

RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick. by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 12:09:24, 133 views. In reply to 'Unacceptable…Kittrick.'

I think sacking or getting rid of SK won’t help matters half way through the season. I was there yesterday to see Tyrone Gay have another awesome performance. It was a fair result completely yesterday. Hyde are a really good side, but I still think we should be doing better against teams like Hyde. They had 10 men for 70 minutes…
In terms of selection, I’m not the manager - but why valentine and dean were not on from the start is beyond me. Their midfield are strong, athletic players so we should have matched them for that. Also, Hewitt clearly isn’t a great right back in my eyes. Got skinned so many times and is a bit too slow I feel to be a right back. I think their right back is quality tbh. Controlled Coulson really well. I think our defence lack a bit of pace and that was evident yesterday.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.234.195

RE: RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick. by Joe90

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 13:23:15, 121 views. In reply to 'RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick.'

Got to say am disappointed by the result and Hyde seem to be so much better than us.. it’s a real shame we couldn’t poach Tyrone and Paddy during the summer… maybe it is the distance Huddersfield and Leeds to Manchester much more doable on a motorway than the awful A64.. you can’t say we don’t have a good enough forward line..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.186.40.11

RE: RE: RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick. by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 14:40:22, 150 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick.'

We’ve got the players. The formation and tactics are all to pot and the manager still doesn’t know his best XI at Christmas.

Why not try 3-5-2? That would allow Coulo and Walshaw to play alongside each other. At present the three forwards are playing 25 yards apart. Easy pickings for most defences, and definitely so for good teams; especially if you pump balls in the air towards an exposed centre forward against a dominant defender who’s already bossed the two previous games between the clubs.

There was no pressing and joining the attack from midfield. Maybe that should be Jimmy Beadle’s or James Cadman’s role? Oh for the creativity of a Pete Davidson.

Play Merris and Wright as wing backs with the three in centre midfield providing cover and impetus.

What was really worrying yesterday was the acceptance post match that the 10 men defended deeper, yet we did nothing to adapt tactically, with formation or with subs; at least until half time. If Valentine had put his sitter away just after the break it may have been different? That said we were being torn apart at the back every time Hyde went forward. It could have been 5-0 as easily as 3-2.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.251.11.54

RE: RE: RE: RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick. by AytonSAFC User: AytonSAFC

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 15:39:06, 124 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick.'

It’s a really difficult one because our league position / proximity to the top is ok, and we had a brilliant cup run. Also still in both other minor cups.

However…. really is concerning how poor we have been against top half teams. Kittrick had a history at guiseley of losing out in playoffs a lot…. maybe not a good manager for big games?
Can’t help but feel he over thinks big games and trys changing roo much.

My other worry is just how organised and coordinated Hyde were yesterday… not necessarily miles better players… they just knew their shape and game plan.

Either way…. no way I feel we can make a change yet… either we will go up or kittrick will go (that’s as far as I see it). Can’t see anything happening soon.

2 other things. 1) wish we would stop playing 4-3-3. Full backs always exposed and striker isolated….. we aren’t a full time club and a basic 4-4-2 would do me!
2) pissed me off at the end when kittrick told his players to come over to the crowd yet he didn’t. He really does seem to lack interpersonal skills at times (some players equally not seeming happy with him)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.145.184.102

RE: RE: RE: RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick. by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 15:51:01, 141 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick.'

“Footballs a simple game. 442″.

R. Bernard, about this time yesterday ;)

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.162.106.219

RE: RE: RE: RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick. by Middi seadog

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 19:25:36, 149 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Unacceptable…Kittrick.'

“We gave it a good go in the second half, their keeper made some good saves."
Yes. But so did ours. We could have been 5 down by the time curtis scored.
Fails to mention the 20 minutes in the first half when we played against 10 men when all their keeper had to do was catch a cross from coulson.
It took 10 minutes after they went down to 10 for our management duo to deem it right to get another man up with walshaw.
Fails to address why stimson wasn’t picked instead of some lad on loan for a month. Are we being dictated to by Harrogate town that he should play? Why was hewitt playing right back instead of valentine? Why was beadle not introduced up top with 10 mins to go on the first half?
“We’ve spoke about it in the dressing room" again….

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.217.43.252

Thread: 90612

Prediction Competition on Christmas break. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 07:45:18, 77 views.

Keep your eyes peeled for the latest league table in the coming days, but we’re going on a break and will resume after the Shields game until the end of the season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Thread: 90611

Interview with SK after loss at Hyde by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 23:58:26, 147 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-steve-kittrick-after-boro-s-loss-at-hyde-1-8925841

Edited by admin on 24/12/17 at 09:10:03
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Thread: 90610

FAO the person who wondered where Totalshell had gone… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 20:30:21, 185 views.

He’s Fishbowl.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.53

RE: FAO the person who wondered where Totalshell had gone… by guy fawkes User: guy fawkes

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 15:42:05, 186 views. In reply to 'FAO the person who wondered where Totalshell had gone…'

Really?! But so what?

I think people may had read it with different eyes because it wasn’t posted by totalshell, and given it a chance. Won’t be the first person to post under a different name to try generate a change of point of view. Maybe you ought to try it yourself - get off the fence, post something controversial, a bit less ‘wood’en maybe!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 41.212.130.198

Or even be really brave….. by Nick Finch

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 18:45:49, 100 views. In reply to 'RE: FAO the person who wondered where Totalshell had gone…'

…….and start using your real names😉

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.3.111.99

RE: Or even be really brave….. by guy fawkes in Mauritius User: guy fawkes

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 19:47:39, 93 views. In reply to 'Or even be really brave…..'

Would that make any difference Nick?

You have posters on here and know who they are, but people don’t want to challenge them because of that, even when they may have something valid to say. Fish bowl for example. Totalshell would have received less air time.

The SS has become a little sterile because of that. Only my opinion obviously.

Best wishes to you and Sarah for the festive season 😏

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 41.212.130.198

Probably not… by Nick Finch

Posted: 24/12/2017 at 23:15:50, 88 views. In reply to 'RE: Or even be really brave…..'

Happy christmas….guy fawkes….

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.3.111.99

If it’ll help Nick… by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 25/12/2017 at 00:51:01, 88 views. In reply to 'Probably not…'

Willesden Seadog is Rob Bernard.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 176.251.11.54

😂 n/t by Nick Finch

Posted: 25/12/2017 at 09:39:08, 62 views. In reply to 'If it’ll help Nick…'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.3.111.99

This is my true identity; by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 25/12/2017 at 13:40:15, 89 views. In reply to '😂 n/t'

http://iv1.lisimg.com/image/9011385/720full-dogtanian.jpg

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.42.101.36

RE: This is my true identity; by ka114 User: ka114

Posted: 25/12/2017 at 13:51:48, 73 views. In reply to 'This is my true identity; '

So I guess the muskahounds aren’t seadogs then?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.200.73.91

As it is the fashion here is mine! by ka114 User: ka114

Posted: 25/12/2017 at 13:55:45, 88 views. In reply to 'RE: This is my true identity; '

https://goo.gl/images/1sgtiS

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.200.73.91

n/t I’m Spartacus by runningman

Posted: 25/12/2017 at 16:20:47, 79 views. In reply to 'As it is the fashion here is mine!'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.194.202
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.