Newest Message: Twitter but not Facebook /t by MAl cD on 19/1/2018, 21:00:45 - View Thread

41

Thread: 90589

billy logan by ian thomas

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 18:02:25, 137 views.

see he’s signed for the pikes

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.170.180.21

on a “short term deal” n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 18:04:20, 109 views. In reply to 'billy logan'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.92

RE: on a “short term deal” n/t by beckywitch User: beckywitch

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 19:06:42, 129 views. In reply to 'on a “short term deal” n/t'

Just read the article. Apparently dual registered and will come back if we need him. So, not as scary as I thought.

beckywitch

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.217.142.216

RE: RE: on a “short term deal” n/t by borotomas User: borotomas

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 19:45:07, 117 views. In reply to 'RE: on a “short term deal” n/t'

Dual registered tends to mean they ain’t coming back. Worked his bollocks off to get in the team. He deserved more game time just better players ahead of him, in my opinion

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.229.177

Thread: 90588

Ball kicked into crowd by AytonSAFC User: AytonSAFC

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 17:41:05, 143 views.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42446341

More evidence that the ref got it all wrong for poor max Wright… possibly cost us in that game and the subsequent suspension. Scottish premiership and matic in premier league both yellows - thought non league was meant to be tougher!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.29.135.119

RE: Ball kicked into crowd by Cynic

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 21:48:52, 103 views. In reply to 'Ball kicked into crowd '

In all reffing decisions there’s always going to be a degree of subjectivity involved. In 95% of cases (possibly more) a ref would have given a yellow. We got unlucky and fell into that 5% red card category . Having said that we were also unlucky in having a ref who wanted to be the centre of attention and found a way to be so. Basically what I’m saying is that on another day most refs wouldn’t have given a red (but some would) but on this day it was always going to be a red because of the official involved. Obviously a personal opinion only (but one based on listening to how he talked to the players throughout the game, it really was all about him).

They’d have probably found a way of winning anyway without Max’s red card. But we’ll never know, will we?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 78.151.48.57

RE: Ball kicked into crowd by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 22:04:51, 42 views. In reply to 'Ball kicked into crowd '

In this recorded incident the guy didn’t show any remorse whatsoever or even try to apologise to the people in the crowd. He did so afterwards having thought about it. To Max’s credit he instantly went to the person who was hit by the ball and showed care and regret. Also the Scottish guy just had the crowd to aim at with little to no fence whereas Max I feel sure tried to hit the barrier. Red very harsh.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

Thread: 90587

Prediction competition by Tim Lazenby

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 13:23:44, 44 views.

Hyde 1 - Boro 2
Crowd 468

Boro 4- tadcaster 1
Crowd 1780

Boro 2 - Clitheroe 1.
Crowd. 1205

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 46.231.14.234

RE: Prediction competition by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 20:22:25, 41 views. In reply to 'Prediction competition '

Glass half empty kinda guy ain’t ya

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.42.101.36

Thread: 90586

From TSN by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 12:09:51, 105 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/beadle-keen-to-play-his-part-in-festive-crackers-1-8920396

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.92

Thread: 90585

NRSC quarter final draw to be live on the radio by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 11:28:38, 63 views.

Radio Tees, that is, on the evening of 3rd January.

The possible opponents are: York, Middlesbrough, Pickering, Northallerton, Thornaby, Redcar Athletic, and Boro Rangers, whom I have to confess not knowing much about.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.92

Thread: 90584

Hyde game by Athletico seadog

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 08:52:06, 127 views.

Does anyone know if the game is definitely segregated? and if it is will the bar be open to away fans? If not a few pointers of places to eat or drink would be appreciated.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.51.172.251

Hyde game by TigerJ User: TigerJ

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 11:39:40, 121 views. In reply to 'Hyde game'

Hi, Hyde fan here, I can confirm the game will be segregated and as a result don’t believe the bar will be open to away fans as it is situated in the ground.
Their is multiple pubs around the ground all within at most 5 mins walk to the ground.

Looking forward to the game, how many are you expecting to travel?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.48.246.113

RE: Hyde game by AytonSAFC User: AytonSAFC

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 13:43:04, 111 views. In reply to 'Hyde game'

Pretty poor that… feeling the need to segregate us and then not having sufficient facilities. Hopefully we have our own shitter in the away end or else I am bring a rolled up newspaper!

On a serious note…. probably be a better atmosphere if we are all bunched together. Would expect about 200 from Boro.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.157.141.208

Hyde game by TigerJ User: TigerJ

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 14:55:32, 92 views. In reply to 'RE: Hyde game'

Understand the frustration but I think after the FA cup game it is pretty sufficient to segregate this game.
Don’t worry you have your own shitter …

Look forward to it should be a good crowd.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.48.246.113

RE: Hyde game by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 15:07:58, 104 views. In reply to 'Hyde game'

Can you confirm that there’s toilet paper?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.77.30.161

RE: RE: Hyde game by AytonSAFC User: AytonSAFC

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 17:24:38, 94 views. In reply to 'RE: Hyde game'

Best bit of the FA cup game was watching the coach drive down the donkey field side with loads of feral 13 yr olds on it going mental against the windows - thug life!
Segregated for our own protection on that evidence ;)

Looking forward to what should be a great game. All to play for…finally might have a striker who can get a free kick after being mauled by Tyrone the octopus Gay!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.29.135.119

RE: RE: RE: Hyde game by borotomas User: borotomas

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 19:33:59, 90 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Hyde game'

Really fascinating game. I fear us a little, which is normal no matter who we play. Played Hyde twice this season and failed to score.
Their professionalism in the Cup game took the piss out of ours and surely they’ve strengthened some then.

Really disliked Hyde after that FA Cup game, maybe easier to hate them than look at the many shortcomings of my own team. But after watching the build up to their game on the bbc it showed what a community centric club they are and, like us, have a lot of people grafting their arse off for the club. Manager seems a bit of an arrogant knob though doesn’t he, he been knocking about with Kittrick? ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.229.177

Thread: 90583

Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 08:32:12, 59 views.

Tables updated once the busy Christmas period is over.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 08:32:34, 55 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 2-0 Boro.

Att: 651

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by Athletico seadog

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 08:41:46, 54 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde utd 2-1 Boro
Att 567

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.51.172.251

RE: RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by The Red Baron User: The Red Baron

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 10:03:47, 50 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 1 - 1 Boro

Att 394

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 194.176.105.154

prediction by dazaster

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 13:13:59, 31 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 1 boro 3
att 472

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 5.68.19.171

Prediction Comp. by Villager

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 07:42:24, 15 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 1 Boro 2

attend. 666

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.227.170.217

Hyde 2-1 Boro Att: 737 n/t by MAlcD

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 10:20:40, 40 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 195.225.189.243

RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 10:29:02, 46 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 3-2 Boro

Attendance 506

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.92

H 2-0 SA (422) NT by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 12:57:44, 32 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'


www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.181.229.108

RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by Zante Seadog

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 14:16:06, 40 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 1 - 2 Boro att 543

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.16.82.236

RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by thirskseadogs User: thirskseadogs

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 17:06:21, 48 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

hyde 1 /2 boro att 644

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 143.159.48.149

Prediction competition by Viking Seadog

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 20:44:57, 36 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

I will be away at Christmas. So I’m posting two matches here:

Hyde United 0 - 1 Scarborough Athletic
Attendance: 678

Scarborough Athletic 4 - 0 Tadcaster Albion
Attendance: 1768

Up the Boro!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 77.16.204.215

RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 23:52:17, 33 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 2-1 Boro, attendance 412

Critically acclaimed Surfing Seadog poster: "Talks the most sense on here by a mile", except for Che.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

Boro 2 v Tadcaster 0 Att: 1,716 by filey1

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 06:28:20, 30 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.223.34.195

Whoops! Getting ahead of myself…Hyde 1 v Boro 1 Att: 659 by filey1

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 06:29:32, 30 views. In reply to 'Boro 2 v Tadcaster 0 Att: 1,716'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.223.34.195

Saturday prediction by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 07:43:27, 34 views. In reply to 'Whoops! Getting ahead of myself…Hyde 1 v Boro 1 Att: 659'

Going for a 1-0 away win (Gate 451)

and hoping/dreaming of it being after constant pressure on our goal we soak it up, score and then defend valiantly. My favourite sort of away game. Mouthy locals, intimidating atmosphere, world and referee against us with the good guys winning.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.79.222.89

RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by rawdonseadog User: rawdonseadog

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 11:13:46, 36 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 1 Boro 2
Att 564

Scarborough FC RIP 1879-2007

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.234.59

RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 20:21:25, 23 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 3-1
Att 620

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 22:09:47, 21 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 2-1 Boro
Att 528

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Prediction by China seadog

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 05:00:09, 17 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Boro 1-1
Attendance 621

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.94.241.243

Hyde 3-1 Boro att: 608 by Stuntpele

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 09:29:11, 17 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.40.57.157

RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by Dunno

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 09:34:40, 19 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 0 - 5 Boro

Att - 675

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.192.73

RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 09:35:56, 19 views. In reply to 'RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

I love how you’re always the most optimistic predictor whilst Seadog Update is always the most pessimistic :)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.89.40

RE: RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by Dunno

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 09:38:43, 18 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Ha ha, the worrying thing is that I always believe il be right!

Got a funny feeling about today though, think we are gonna turn them over.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.192.73

RE: Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A) by Gavin Avison User: Gavin Avison

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 12:31:53, 13 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 1 2 Boro
attendance 598

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.196.222

re prediction competition by kasey

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 13:20:05, 13 views. In reply to 'Prediction Competition: Hyde United (A)'

Hyde 2 Scarborough 1
att 477

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.140.118

RE: re prediction competition by Che User: Che

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 14:48:09, 13 views. In reply to 're prediction competition'

669
Hyde 2-3 Boro

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.190.29.196

Thread: 90582

Temporary terracing by Danae69

Posted: 20/12/2017 at 19:48:51, 169 views.

Any update on the terracing situation.will any be in place for boxing day as expecting a bumper crowd.So difficult to see the game if your not on the front leaning on the advertising hoardings.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.220.253.96

RE: Temporary terracing by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 20:47:40, 104 views. In reply to 'Temporary terracing'

There was a match at FLS on Tuesday night and there was still only one temporary terracing unit on site then - so my guess would be it’s not going to be in place for Boxing Day unless there has been a flurry of activity since.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.54.114

Lack of any news on terracing by Danae69

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 21:20:30, 94 views. In reply to 'RE: Temporary terracing'

I was sure the chairman said it would be in place for Christmas.The boxing day match would of been the best time for any newbies matchday experience.think they have missed the boat their.I go with my wife and if we go for a drink at the bar before and at half time so don’t get to stand at the front so struggle to see the game.having a couple beers is part of our matchday ritual as meet friends in the bar.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.220.253.96

im the opposite! by Dunno

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 21:25:27, 87 views. In reply to 'Lack of any news on terracing'

I thought the Chairman said it wouldn’t be in place for Christmas. I don’t think the boat has been missed, I don’t think the tide has been in for it to sail. They have all been working their socks off to get it ready and no doubt would have loved to have it ready. At least it will be here (HOPEFULLY) for the promotion party at the end of the season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.192.73

Here’s the link by Club.comms User: Club.comms

Posted: 21/12/2017 at 21:29:30, 69 views. In reply to 'im the opposite!'

http://www.scarboroughathletic.com/news/2017-11-20/boardroom-sat-18-november

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.196.128

Wish I was 6ft 5 by Danae69

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 07:48:44, 62 views. In reply to 'im the opposite!'

Thanks for link.I was sure chairman said he would have some temporary stands in by Christmas.It even had an article in Scarborough news about it!looks like I will be bringing my orange box on box day.have a lovely Christmas

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.220.253.96

Development by Nick Finch

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 10:12:30, 70 views. In reply to 'Wish I was 6ft 5'

Rather than using odd names on unofficial forums it would be nice to speak to people face to face.

Having looked in great detail at the current ground configuration and long term requirements of the club (as we hopefully climb up the leagues) we have decided to not rush things. The club needs to get things right so to not waste large amounts of money on structures which will not give medium to longterm benefits.

I promise that behind the scenes huge amounts of preparation ia going into plans.

Nick Finch

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.205.192.250

RE: Development by Slightly concerned seadog

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 10:30:39, 62 views. In reply to 'Development '

Thanks Nick,
When do you anticipate the plans will be submitted to the council?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.205.192.183

Honestly by Nick Finch

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 10:51:25, 68 views. In reply to 'RE: Development '

The best answer I can give is when we are ready. We will not be giving any timescales until we are confident that the phasing works.

The developments will take place. However, like all these things planning is key.

Nick Finch

P.s. why can people not say who they are? It does my nut in that you expect answers from officials but this site works under a cloak and sometimes dagger system.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.205.192.250

Re:Honestly by BoroNo7 User: BoroNo7

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 16:01:56, 69 views. In reply to 'Honestly '

Nick, please relax, most people understand it’s not easy to spend money wisely and effectively and these things always take longer than we feel they should - it’s easy to be an armchair expert when we don’t have the full picture or the responsibility for ensuring a successful outcome.

I’m sure most of us appreciate that any ground improvements need to pass Planning and H&S requirements as well as being consistent with preparing the ground to meet the criteria for the Club to play higher up the pyramid.

Again, most people recognise how hard you personally and the rest of your fellow-Directors have worked to get us to where we are now and how you continue to work to take the Club forward - perhaps a formal progress report on the official Club website early in the New Year would answer a lot of people’s questions

You certainly have got my thanks and support for all your efforts and I’m sure most other supporters feel the same

Have a good Christmas & UTB

Edited on 22/12/17 at 16:20:09
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.24.148.162

i thought Flamingo land were paying for improvements by dazaster

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 13:11:57, 72 views. In reply to 'Development '

“The club needs to get things right so to not waste large amounts of money on structures which will not give medium to longterm benefits."
where’s the 100k gone? for the ground naming

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 5.68.19.171

Regardless of who’s paying… by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 13:23:31, 73 views. In reply to 'i thought Flamingo land were paying for improvements'

Why waste money on a short term measure if those working on it have come to the conclusion that a short term fix isn’t the best solution.

Maybe better to wait a few months and spend the cash on something long term?

Fully aware there’ll be some nudging each other and saying there isn’t any Flamingo Land cash, but I’d prefer to trust those in charge. After all, we had 8 years of “It’ll never happen".

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.79.222.88

RE: Regardless of who’s paying… by Cynic

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 16:50:33, 53 views. In reply to 'Regardless of who’s paying…'

Fair enough the board are probably making the right decision here but I’m a long way from being convinced that ensuring people who pay to watch a football match can actually see the game can be classed as wasting money. I know that this particular ship has sailed and there’s nothing that can be done but nobody should ever accept gracefully that a purpose built ground was built on the basic premise that many in the ground wouldn’t actually be able to see the game (unless 6ft 5″). Playing devil’s advocate how does the restricted viewing compare with lower league grounds abroad Bob?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 78.151.48.57

RE: Temporary terracing by Rangerman

Posted: 22/12/2017 at 17:27:12, 72 views. In reply to 'Temporary terracing'

Iv stopped going when there may be a big crowd. Took some visiting relatives to the Trafford game and must admit I was embarrassed at the lack of view of the game for them. I will be keeping my £10 in my pocket until the much-needed terracing issues are resolved. Iv heard several people say the same.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 5.67.125.32

RE: RE: Temporary terracing by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 00:54:57, 49 views. In reply to 'RE: Temporary terracing'

Well hopefully you won’t be away too long. We don’t own the ground and didn’t design it, it’s not our fault, and we have to make do with what was provided by the council for us to rent. That said, it clearly wasn’t (in practical terms anyway) fit for purpose given that at half capacity - or less - people can’t see. I don’t understand why terracing wasn’t put in all the way round from the outset, when it was being built. I presumed it was because of cost but was once made to think otherwise by someone who knows about construction. Could be bull. Either way, it’s not a good facility for a capacity crowd of 2,000 like it should be - as that’s what it was always billed as being for. Also, considering that the “shed” stand was meant to be for 500 people the steps are so shallow that it’s a hell of a tight squeeze. If someone behind you is, erm, let’s say “protruding of the stomach area through a long term propensity to pies”, then you’re screwed and need to stand another step down. There’s ample room in front of the stand, and people are standing there en mass because of such ample room - yet they aren’t covered from the weather by the roof, which only covers as far as the steps. So arguably this stand wasn’t thought through either. However, I love the new ground, it’s in Scarborough not 20 miles away, and there are current plans and further potential down the line to improve it. I’d have stood in a field if it meant watching us in Scarborough after years in brid. Now, there’s a thought………..

Edited on 23/12/17 at 01:06:27
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.42.101.36

RE: RE: RE: Temporary terracing by Cynic

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 08:17:54, 58 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Temporary terracing'

100% spot on.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.74.114.87

RE: RE: RE: RE: Temporary terracing by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 23/12/2017 at 13:13:39, 24 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Temporary terracing'

👍

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.232.191

Thread: 90581

Last chance to vote in Leagues top team for 50th anniversary by Club.comms User: Club.comms

Posted: 20/12/2017 at 11:50:13, 88 views.

Your chance to vote for the EVO-STIK League’s star team and top one hundred players of all time to celebrate the competition’s milestone fiftieth anniversary season is nearly up!

The online public poll to name the Northern Premier League’s ‘Top 100 Players’ and ‘Team of all Time’ of the last five decades ends on Friday 22 December

Players with a Scarborough connection that made the Final 100 shortlist include:

- Billy Ayre
- Dave Merris
- James Walshaw
- Jeff Barmby
- Harry Dunn
- Harry ‘A’ Dunn
- Tony Aveyard
- Gary Bradshaw

To vote via the website, click here: www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/X7NRP55

CLOSING DATE: FRIDAY 22 DECEMBER

To read pen pics of the Scarborough players in the Top 200 see http://scarboroughathletic.com/news/2017-12-19/vote-league-100

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.4.156.106

Thread: 90580

BRICK DEADLINE LOOMS: Deadline for Buy-A-Brick is 22/12/17 by SAFC Admin

Posted: 19/12/2017 at 14:00:23, 94 views.

Deadlne is Friday 22nd December at 10pm

Link here:
http://scarboroughathletic.com/news/2017-09-09/buy-a-brick-re-opens

Edited by admin on 19/12/17 at 21:23:21
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.74.121.213

Thread: 90579

Goals from Saturday by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 19/12/2017 at 11:13:05, 140 views.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqOqywifKG4&feature=youtu.be

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.95.1

Thread: 90578

Hyde game by Boro345

Posted: 19/12/2017 at 09:16:32, 161 views.

According to Facebook saturdays game is segregated

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 91.85.204.200

Thread: 90577

Club shop by Boro

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 16:24:44, 99 views.

Hi, does the club shop have a card machine or will i need to bring cash. Cheers

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.140.246

The card machine will be in operation n/t by SAFC Admin

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 16:27:36, 95 views. In reply to 'Club shop'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.74.121.213

Thread: 90576

Supporters Travel to Hyde/South Shields by SAFC Admin

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 15:53:25, 110 views.

There is a bus running to the HUGE League game at Hyde on Saturday 23rd December, departing the Railway Station at 10.15am for just £15 per head.

The bus to South Shields will leave the Railway Station at 11.30am on New Year’s Day for just £10 per head. Supporter’s travelling with Ken to both games will receive a discount for South Shields travel. The club hopes to get a big away following to these games to cheer on the boro in force!

To book a place on either of the buses, please contact Ken on 07736 790418 asap

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.74.121.213

Thread: 90575

Club Shop Open for Last Grabs Before Christmas-Official Site by SAFC Admin

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 12:07:44, 92 views.

http://scarboroughathletic.com/news/2017-12-18/club-shop-open-for-last-grabs-before-christmas

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.74.107.4

Thread: 90574

Honest thoughts on SK by Joe90

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 15:26:11, 193 views.

Just wondering how people are warming to SK, I have always been a fan I think his ruthless enough to get us promoted. Even now with a good squad his looking to improve further, I think that can only do us well in the long run.

His assembled a good squad with strong competition that’s what we need. I also like his gone outside the club for an assistant could of done the easy thing and recruited within but went out and got someone who will have fresh eyes and a different view.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.186.40.11

RE: Honest thoughts on SK by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 16:02:54, 166 views. In reply to 'Honest thoughts on SK'

For me, I’ve always been behind him, he came with a good pedigree and after his first game against Bamber Bridge which was lost 3-0 I was highly impressed with his interview which that day was given to Radio York - relive it here if interested.

He got us safe by early April, and I stood by my decision that he was the right guy when our form then tailed off, and Burscough gave us a thrashing on the final day and there were mutterings about if he was really the long term solution. The next season, last, he briefly got us top in November, then form tailed off, and ironically it was at Burscough again when he got some RIGHT stick from the fans, which I wanted to disassociate myself from. Then he rallied the troops to “Do it for Dave" and get us into the play-offs against all the odds.

This season, we’ve had our best ever FA Cup run, and he’s got us 11 wins out of 17. What’s not to like. In the word of the great man…"It is what it is" ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.21

RE: Honest thoughts on SK by Taylor.

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 16:50:04, 155 views. In reply to 'Honest thoughts on SK'

It’s a no brainier really. Teams getting stronger all the time, he’ll do for me.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.156.90.95

RE: RE: Honest thoughts on SK by Terry Hope

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 19:04:00, 149 views. In reply to 'RE: Honest thoughts on SK'

It’s a cut throats industry from Premier League down to non league and results dictate those that will survive. He needs to achieve his and our goal and he knows that better than anyone. Clearly as supporters we want to achieve promotion for our own wellbeing but I feel many fans would welcome it now for SK. The chant on Saturday was a bit of a p**s take but I think it was also borne out of some growing affection. Long may it develop.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

Kittrick is great by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 21:45:31, 134 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Honest thoughts on SK'

There

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.42.101.36

Best manager we’ve had…. by Che User: Che

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 23:48:31, 144 views. In reply to 'Kittrick is great '

..there. :)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.190.29.196

RE: Best manager we’ve had…. by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 00:03:23, 146 views. In reply to 'Best manager we’ve had….'

To have a manager at our level with such experience in conference north and national is pretty amazing really, I think that is forgotten sometimes by a select few

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.42.101.36

Judgement pending until May… by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 09:21:55, 157 views. In reply to 'RE: Best manager we’ve had….'

I expect nothing less than promotion this season with 4 possible spots up for grabs.

He’s doing a decent but expected job with a very fair budget and the personnel at his disposal.

I get concerned with the tactics at times, but he’s done well to address the defence. Done a fine job in that department.

Huge game Saturday in terms of have we learned tactically from our previous two encounters?

If we wish to gain automatic promotion, Saturday and the two games with Bamber Bridge will be crucial. I’d take a scrappy 0-0 right now.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.79.209.49

50-50 by New Seadog

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 10:33:49, 128 views. In reply to 'Judgement pending until May…'

I’m 50-50 with the manager, the results are there I just wonder if he’s got potential to upset everyone all in one go. He’s already had a go at players and fans in the post-match interviews, these things sometimes have a long-term negative effect but we will see.

That said, can’t complain with results - the league table reflects that and the clubs best run in the FA cup too.

On the whole, I’d like to see us play more football at home. I can understand going away you may have to be more direct, but on the 3G at home we should be battering teams with the good footballers we’ve got.

Saturday was a great example of that, we played it (generally) on the deck.

Walshaw looks incredibly good and don’t look too much in to the goals, as his movement, hold up and build up play was superb, looks like a real striker. Doesn’t pass much around the area, but you don’t get 20 goals already this year by being any other way! Great signing.

Cadman also looked good and might get a few more games off the back of that performance, I’d be surprised if he was sat on the bench for the next game.

Still a bit worried about the inability to deal with a simple long ball, but that was the only real negative from Saturday for me.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.121.203.218

Improving all the time by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 15:42:43, 114 views. In reply to '50-50'

In his first season he kept us up when we looked in real trouble.
Last season he got us to 3rd position with an incredible last eight game winning run.
This season, he’s got us to the 4th Qualifying Round of the cup for the first time, and we are averaging 2.11 points per game which is good by anyone’s standards.

Like a few people have said, he’ll ultimately be judged on the target this season: promotion. We absolutely must go up by hook or crook this season. Whether it’s the easy way in 2nd, the slightly harder AGM Cup way in 3rd, or the hardest way in 4th, 5th, 6th or maybe even 7th. We have to go up.

Edited on 18/12/17 at 15:43:27
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Lacking in man management skills. by Fendog

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 15:46:09, 130 views. In reply to 'Honest thoughts on SK'

Also fan management.
After Tommy Taylor has a great game came out saying just doing his job. Give the lasso me credit. Great keeper.
If we get promoted don’t expect no bells and whistles from me sk… Just doing your job.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.121.7.194

Ah but isn’t that good man management? by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 15:48:08, 137 views. In reply to 'Lacking in man management skills. '

I’m not saying you’re wrong or I’m right, but Rudy Funk was guilty of the opposite. He’d praise and praise and praise, and I think that led to complacency sometimes.

Yes it’s nice for players to hear they’re doing well, but I think there’s a lot to be said for keeping their feet on the ground.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Agreed by Fendog

Posted: 19/12/2017 at 05:57:35, 125 views. In reply to 'Ah but isn’t that good man management?'

Agree. It’s a very fine line. Just from kitkats side of the line soo easy to loose the fans and the players.
Go te other way and I just feel you get a bit of leeway what maybe the results s aren’t there.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.121.7.194

Thread: 90573

James Walshaw by Dundee Dog

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 12:03:40, 186 views.

I’ve not watched Boro for over two years, my first visit to the new ground - it looks good, the team were playing some really attractive football. Michael Coulson and James Walshaw are a class apart, Walshaw particularly is a real goal predator.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.52.182.241

RE: James Walshaw by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 12:58:59, 170 views. In reply to 'James Walshaw'

Agreed, and even though he’s only scored 1 of the 9 goals we’ve scored since signing him, he always looks a goal threat and will no doubt start scoring on a regular basis sooner rather than later

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.21

Thread: 90572

To the boro fan with the vuvuzela by borotomas User: borotomas

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 05:01:11, 176 views.

Just want to say great effort to the fan who stood behind the away team dug out for the entire first half blowing his horn and generally being a pest.

You sacrificed your own enjoyment (maybe not) for the good of the team

I salute you sir, well played

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.190.236.169

Mrs Trellis?! Is that you?! n/t by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 07:52:52, 126 views. In reply to 'To the boro fan with the vuvuzela'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 87.115.26.253

Not on this occasion! by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 18/12/2017 at 20:17:19, 103 views. In reply to 'Mrs Trellis?! Is that you?! n/t'

Honestly. The kazoo stayed in the car and I was nowhere near the dug out.
I was at the back of the goal and restricted myself to reminding Leigh Overton how he dived clean over Carl Stewart’s shot in the away match last season.

The lad in question has a special talent and has long been an expert at this. As soon as the opposition officials make to shout an instruction he shouts over the top of them. I think the vuvuzela is a relatively recent addition!

There were times at Brid where opposition managers and coaches would move down the touchline to get away from him and he would just go with them!

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 90.196.158.186

I thought by Fendog

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 10:24:50, 127 views. In reply to 'To the boro fan with the vuvuzela'

I thought he was there to bleep out any negative comment from the main stand.! -)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.166.123.65

Vuvuzela! by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 11:33:05, 121 views. In reply to 'I thought'

He may well have annoyed the away ‘dug out’ but he also pi**ed the heck out of most in the main stand, mainly Boro supporters.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

could be worse by dazaster

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 12:32:26, 126 views. In reply to 'Vuvuzela!'

could have been those paper things that make a annoying racket as used by teams like Leicester and Huddersfield should be docked 30 points for letting fans use them

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 5.68.19.171

C’mon burniston by borotomas User: borotomas

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 13:11:16, 136 views. In reply to 'could be worse'

You sound like an enemy of football you spoil sport. I was sat in the stand and I’m not hard of hearing like many in there probably are. I saw humerous side

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.163.83.215

RE: C’mon burniston by deep seadog User: deep seadog

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 15:32:49, 106 views. In reply to 'C’mon burniston '

got to confess to some dark thoughts about how he would get home with it stuck up his arse :)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.130.117.202

RE:C’mon burniston by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 16:31:45, 108 views. In reply to 'C’mon burniston '

Don’t mean to be a killjoy but it was the never-endingness (if there is a word) of it & would have been great if it had been selective like after a goal or a good move. Maybe I was sat closer than you but we struggled to even hear ourselves. Yes it was quite funny for the 1st 20 mins but then again I have become a miserable old git lately, my reward being a reduction at the gate.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.124

Thread: 90571

Fans were fantastic today by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 18:17:10, 181 views.

It may have been our lowest Saturday crowd of the season, but you wouldn’t have known it from the noise we made, in the 2nd half especially. We were rightly criticised in midweek but as a fanbase we gave it all today.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.95.43

RE: Fans were fantastic today by Taylor.

Posted: 17/12/2017 at 09:32:10, 118 views. In reply to 'Fans were fantastic today'

Yes great support for the mighty Boro yesterday and also a great turnout from the Boro faithful. Must say I thought we might have had a smaller gate just before Xmas and cold day. Looking forward to watching Boro over Xmas and New Year. Let’s hope we can get the results we need to keep us challenging for promotion.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.156.90.95

Thread: 90570

Deserved win by Villager

Posted: 16/12/2017 at 18:11:21, 133 views.

Well done today ,always going to be a battle ,gifted them a goal then got a quick one back , Cadman deserved the man of the match and the subs played very well so all in all a good 3 points and only bad luck will see us missing out on a good festive run on this form ‘

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.227.170.217
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.