Newest Message: RE: we didn’t really deserve a point by Armchairdog on 18/11/2017, 17:25:37 - View Thread

87

Thread: 90240

Re Nathan Valentine, why.. by Terry Hope

Posted: 18/10/2017 at 22:14:46, 164 views.

.. does SK play him in a virtual right back defensive role against Hyde and then have a go at him in his latest interview for defending poorly when his performances and scoring ratio suggest his best role is as an attacking midfielder?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 83.100.155.153

RE: Re Nathan Valentine, why.. by borotomas User: borotomas

Posted: 19/10/2017 at 16:00:31, 85 views. In reply to 'Re Nathan Valentine, why..'

was he signed as a right back but had a spell helping out in attack or was he signed as an attacker who’s been helping out defensively?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.190.148.115

Newer Thread: Boro Sign Top Striker Walshaw

Older Thread: Match report from the win against Whitby

© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.