Newest Message: I thought we did by seadog365 on 18/11/2017, 17:49:22 - View Thread

85

Thread: 90274

SAFC TV Highlights from Kendal - Worth a watch! by club.comms User: club.comms

Posted: 22/10/2017 at 20:13:10, 172 views.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDXdLYpOva8&feature=youtu.be

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.1.33.201

Shows how unlucky we were. Should have gone to 1-3. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 22/10/2017 at 20:17:39, 124 views. In reply to 'SAFC TV Highlights from Kendal - Worth a watch!'

Coulo inches away from another great goal, and then the stonewall of all penalties turned down. They then break and equalise. Yes it was sloppy at the back, but on another day with another ref, we come home with a comfortable three points.

Onwards and upwards.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Terrible decision given how close the ref was by Old Git

Posted: 22/10/2017 at 20:26:16, 123 views. In reply to 'Shows how unlucky we were. Should have gone to 1-3.'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.197.97

18 seconds by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 22/10/2017 at 20:44:05, 123 views. In reply to 'SAFC TV Highlights from Kendal - Worth a watch!'

the official timing of their 1st goal, 18 seconds in to the second half.

Have we ever conceded earlier in either half?

Edited on 22/10/17 at 20:44:26
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.88.165

Regarding the possible penalty by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 23/10/2017 at 13:00:39, 115 views. In reply to '18 seconds'

I know it’s all done & dusted now anyway but looking at the video, it looked to me that (maybe) the Kendal defender made contact with the ball first before Ross tripped over his leg & as was said, the ref was closest, then this could be right & no penalty, if my understanding of the rules is correct.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.150.171.183

That was a pen all day long by Seadogmatt

Posted: 23/10/2017 at 13:11:20, 109 views. In reply to 'Regarding the possible penalty'

Watched it 5 times and cannot see how he didn’t give it! Hope that 2 points aren’t crucial at the end of the season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.129.179

Shoulda been given for the jump into the tackle by Old Git

Posted: 23/10/2017 at 13:38:04, 103 views. In reply to 'That was a pen all day long'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.166.123.45

RE: Shoulda been given for the jump into the tackle by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/10/2017 at 13:47:17, 110 views. In reply to 'Shoulda been given for the jump into the tackle'

Exactly, freeze the video at 2.32 and you’ll see he’s flying into the tackle dangerously with both feet off the ground.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.230.143.92

RE: RE: Shoulda been given for the jump into the tackle by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 23/10/2017 at 14:38:14, 120 views. In reply to 'RE: Shoulda been given for the jump into the tackle'

See what you mean, it was a jump tackle and dangerous. I was focusing on who actually touched the ball first which looked like Kendal but not certain. However the nature of the tackle should have been enough & I agree that it warranted a pen. Pleased to be corrected.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.150.171.183

RE: RE: RE: Shoulda been given for the jump into the tackle by Seadogmatt

Posted: 23/10/2017 at 16:32:02, 104 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Shoulda been given for the jump into the tackle'

If the kendel player had of touched the ball, coming in at that height and speed tge ball would of moved forward or have been caught under him. The movement of the ball was due to ross’s touch before he was cleaned out literally under the incompetant idiots nose! Worst decision ever

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.129.179

Newer Thread: Boro Sign Top Striker Walshaw

Older Thread: Nelly goes too

© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.