Newest Message: all the best to Pricey by Old Git on 23/5/2018, 13:33:02 - View Thread

21

Thread: 91460

Sat 21 July: Boro vs FC United of Manchester n/t by malton seadog User: malton seadog

Posted: 23/5/2018 at 12:04:40, 24 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.240

Super! N/T by beckywitch User: beckywitch

Posted: 23/5/2018 at 13:06:52, 6 views. In reply to 'Sat 21 July: Boro vs FC United of Manchester n/t'


beckywitch

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.39

Thread: 91458

Jamie price by Boro345

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 20:26:42, 81 views.

Has just announced On twitter he’ll Be leaving the club for more game time, also seen today that tyrone gay has left Hyde! Possible new signing?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 91.85.204.200

No by ka114 User: ka114

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 20:36:17, 53 views. In reply to 'Jamie price '

I hop we can do better, he is fantastic for evo stik north/east, but has no pace and when turned is like running in treacle, would think teams in our new league will have more nous and work out his weaknesses

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.69

Choice between 2 by Seadog93

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 20:41:22, 71 views. In reply to 'Jamie price '

Who would you rather have Tyrone gay or bailey gooda?
I know who I would pick.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.138

me too, and it rhymes with hailey wooda. by Dunno

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 21:00:31, 60 views. In reply to 'Choice between 2 '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e1c:c800:1

RE: me too, and it rhymes with hailey wooda. by AytonSAFC User: AytonSAFC

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 21:11:42, 55 views. In reply to 'me too, and it rhymes with hailey wooda.'

Regardless of whether we get gooda back (which I would love to), I would have Tyrone gay here at the drop of a hat. He’s pretty agricultural to say the least but every time I have seen him play against us he has dominated our front line. For what weaknesses he has he also has some real strengths. Be interesting to see our goal scoring record against teams with him in it!
Also… from seeing a few games of the evostik premier - not sure the quality is far different, and every team I have seen at that level have a massive centre back!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.165.220

all the best to Pricey by Old Git

Posted: 23/5/2018 at 13:33:02, 3 views. In reply to 'Jamie price '

and thanks for helping get us to where we are.
Hope he get himself a good club and a nice berth
for a season or three.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 146.199.89.114

Thread: 91457

4th pre-season fixture announced by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 19:02:51, 74 views.

Reigning Conference North play-off winners Harrogate town away on Tuesday 24th July.

Still 4 Saturdays to fill up, and Malton’s theory is still holding.

Edited on 22/05/18 at 19:09:38
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.62

RE: 4th pre-season fixture announced by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 20:09:36, 45 views. In reply to '4th pre-season fixture announced'

Not really a theory, just damn good business sense.

Pointless playing Brid, Pickering, Scarborough and District etc. on a Saturday away from home, while in (hopefully) sunny Scarborough, our ground is empty.

Speculating here of course, but I imagine we want “useful" competitive friendlies away midweek on grass, and any exhibition matches or crowd-pullers at home on Saturdays. It worked last season. Our first friendly at EY Carnegie attracted 271, while Sheff Utd attracted almost ten times that. Unusual circumstances given it was our first game back, but the point still holds.

Friendlies will always be about getting the team ready for the season (Pickering away, Harrogate away), maintaining good local relations (Scarborough XI), and playing charity/memorial matches (Brid Town). The missing link at the moment is crowd-pulling games against “glamour" sides, which is where the Saturdays at FLS will come into play.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.144

Thread: 91456

Ground improvement. by Gabe User: Gabe

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 16:46:19, 62 views.

Anyone got any ideas on the timescale of the proposed improvements?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:867b:1000:4

Thread: 91454

Friendlies - so far by beckywitch User: beckywitch

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 15:58:30, 53 views.

I was eagerly awaiting an announcement about the PSFs only to find the first three are all away on an evening meaning no public transport to get back home.
And to think I purposefully planned my holiday to ensure I would be at home in July.

beckywitch

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.23

still 4 Saturdays to be filled though… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 16:52:50, 44 views. In reply to 'Friendlies - so far'

I’m sure there will be some cracking games on those days ;-)

Unless transport is “laid on" for the Brid or Pickering games I won’t be going.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.105

As I predicted… by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 16:58:27, 55 views. In reply to 'still 4 Saturdays to be filled though…'

Play the Tuesday/Thursday night games away, and have all the Saturdays at home. Saturday home games = £££.

Edited on 22/05/18 at 16:58:37
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.144

RE: As I predicted… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 17:00:30, 55 views. In reply to 'As I predicted…'

Your prediction was (so far!) correct, but in theory every team would prefer to have their home friendlies on the Saturday, which obviously can’t happen.

Then again I guess Pickering can’t play home games on Saturdays in the summer which is why our friendlies there are always midweek.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.105

RE: As I predicted… by beckywitch User: beckywitch

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 21:57:59, 36 views. In reply to 'As I predicted…'

You’re right. I wasn’t thinking of that.

beckywitch

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.23

Thread: 91453

Pickering friendly announced by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 15:40:45, 50 views.

away on Thursday 9th August!!

http://scarboroughathletic.com/news/2018-05-22/further-fixture-released

Less than 48 hours until the new season - don’t over-exert yourselves in this one lads!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.105

Thread: 91452

A message from Max Wright by willb User: willb

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 15:14:01, 87 views.

https://twitter.com/MaxWright1998/status/998921743074058240?s=19

Edited by admin on 22/05/18 at 15:41:06
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.252

Thread: 91446

Second pre-season friendly announced by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 21/5/2018 at 14:33:54, 104 views.

Scarborough and District XI (Silver Royd) Tuesday 10th July

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.76

Thread: 91445

brid by thirskseadogs User: thirskseadogs

Posted: 21/5/2018 at 13:41:57, 107 views.

Scarborough Athletic – Tuesday 17th July – Home – Kick Off 7.30pm
(This is for the Dave Holland Memorial Trophy)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 147.147.145.66

RE: brid by .-. …

Posted: 21/5/2018 at 16:18:33, 78 views. In reply to 'brid'

I was under the impression the annual fixture would have one season at home and the next away?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:9272:7100:

it’s at Queensgate nt by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 21/5/2018 at 16:25:32, 65 views. In reply to 'RE: brid'


www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.155

RE: it’s at Queensgate nt by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 21/5/2018 at 16:48:30, 68 views. In reply to 'it’s at Queensgate nt'

Yes the original post was copied, in its entirety, from the Brid site, without any clarification of this admittedly.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.92.138

Thread: 91444

Will Baines by Southern dog

Posted: 20/5/2018 at 12:27:32, 150 views.

We will miss him. Why is he leaving?
Is there a replacement lined up?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.65

RE: Will Baines by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 20/5/2018 at 12:47:54, 128 views. In reply to 'Will Baines'

AGREED

(dunno about the other two)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.124

Will Baines by Cynic Al

Posted: 20/5/2018 at 20:15:23, 135 views. In reply to 'RE: Will Baines'

Agreed that we will miss him.

My understanding is that it is a time and tiredness issue. I believe he will continue to commentate on YCR. Will does a lot of behind the scenes work on a voluntary basis. I can’t guess at the number of hours of his life that this takes up. Eventually the need for a rest, to recharge the batteries or maybe to focus on other areas of life, arises. It’s why the club needs volunteers both on match days and non match days to help the club run smoothly.

I am confident that some of the tasks that need doing could be done from anywhere in the country.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.41

Thread: 91443

Pre season friendlies and signings by Southern dog

Posted: 20/5/2018 at 11:19:08, 146 views.

Anybody heard any rumours?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.65

RE: Pre season friendlies and signings by AytonSAFC User: AytonSAFC

Posted: 20/5/2018 at 19:42:23, 116 views. In reply to 'Pre season friendlies and signings'

Nothing on either account. Know he said all this season’s squad will be invited back to pre season and hope we keep all of them. Not sure when inviting them all back will convert into them agreeing /signing on.

Wally and coulo on contract too. Of the others…. must keeps for me are: Taylor, Johnson, hewitt, Merris cadman, Dean, Valentine.
Some good other players who I would welcome back too.

Replacing max is going to be a massive task.

Reckon Bailey might come back as if Harrogate didn’t want him in conference north I doubt they will renew his contact for conference.

Would love to sign Tyrone gay. Not signed yet at Hyde…

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.135

Friendly predictions by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 21/5/2018 at 17:56:29, 71 views. In reply to 'RE: Pre season friendlies and signings'

Firstly, I think we’ll be try and have as many home friendlies on Saturdays as possible, against fairly attractive opposition.

For that reason, I predict Tuesday night away games vs Scarborough XI (confirmed), Bridlington (confirmed), Pickering, and maybe someone like Tadcaster.

At home, I wouldn’t be surprised if we had another U23 Football League game (Leeds, or one of the Sheffield clubs, or Hull), and then maybe some attractive first teams from higher leagues. Someone like Notts County, Grimsby (given our Max links), or - dare I say it - York City. That’d be an interesting game against a team now one(!) league above us. Not sure North Yorkshire Police would fancy that though, nor our club officials!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.144

RE: Friendly predictions by Seadog93

Posted: 21/5/2018 at 18:19:33, 73 views. In reply to 'Friendly predictions'

Surprised no one has mentioned F.C. United a fan based club with decent away following!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.106

RE: RE: Friendly predictions by Che User: Che

Posted: 21/5/2018 at 20:44:16, 67 views. In reply to 'RE: Friendly predictions'

…. someone mentioned on twitter about a rumour they’d heard about this one back in early March.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:866b:3700:b

How about… by filey1

Posted: 21/5/2018 at 20:51:02, 72 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Friendly predictions'

Hartlepool, Barnsley, Bradford City, FC Halifax, Harrogate Town, the new Ossett United

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.154

A great big yes for Ossett Utd by Old Git

Posted: 22/5/2018 at 06:57:44, 64 views. In reply to 'How about…'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 146.199.89.114

Thread: 91442

Released players from other clubs by Seadog93

Posted: 18/5/2018 at 17:47:46, 178 views.

I wonder if kittrick will be looking to speak to several players who have been released from there clubs. I.e York, Hull, Leeds
Just because I’ve seen will Annan a winger who made an impact at tadcaster has been released by Hull today along with others.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.226.73

Annan had a good game against us the other week by Joe90

Posted: 18/5/2018 at 19:58:50, 155 views. In reply to 'Released players from other clubs'

Similar player to max (would prefer max though! )

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:1e80:2b00:

Thread: 91441

Tom Corner signs for Ossett United by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 23:02:15, 150 views.

He joins them from Ossett Albion.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.62

Least this new club are ambitious 🙄 by borotomas User: borotomas

Posted: 18/5/2018 at 10:44:30, 133 views. In reply to 'Tom Corner signs for Ossett United'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.226.119

Thread: 91440

North Ferriby have new owners - Waltham gone. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 09:54:40, 172 views.

Waltham has relocated to India with work (and to no doubt purchase Calcutta United and Bombay Town FC), and so Ferriby have new ownership.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.144

RE: North Ferriby have new owners - Waltham gone. by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 10:42:02, 162 views. In reply to 'North Ferriby have new owners - Waltham gone.'

Admit it, you just made those club names up didn’t you ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.62

Of course he has….. by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 12:13:40, 166 views. In reply to 'RE: North Ferriby have new owners - Waltham gone.'

…I believe he is referring to Kolkata United and Mumbai Town FC respectively.

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.27

RE: Of course he has….. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 12:38:07, 143 views. In reply to 'Of course he has…..'

I thought about that when typing, funnily enough. I’m usually rigorous with using geographically and politically appropriate names, but I just couldn’t be bothered today.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.144

Thread: 91439

Hume interview by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 00:28:56, 146 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-boro-s-mark-hume-after-the-club-final-loss-1-9167789

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.62

RE: Hume interview by .-. …

Posted: 18/5/2018 at 07:21:17, 94 views. In reply to 'Hume interview '

Got the ref. spot on. Good interview. 👍

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:9272:7100:

Thread: 91438

SK interview by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 00:18:31, 128 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-steve-kittrick-after-boro-s-north-riding-fa-senior-cup-final-defeat-1-9167773

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.62

Thread: 91437

Real class from Jimmy Beadle and possibly others….. by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 16/5/2018 at 23:46:30, 224 views.

After receiving his medal tonight Jimmy looked into the crowd, went to the front row had a brief conversation with a young child and gave away the medal.
Even from a distance it was obvious that the child was delighted.

Well done Jimmy - really impressive and a great way to ensure a young fan becomes a lifelong fan.

I believe Walshaw and Valentine may have done something similar but didn’t see it myself.

Edited on 16/05/18 at 23:46:56
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.67

RE: Real class from Jimmy Beadle and possibly others….. by thirskseadogs User: thirskseadogs

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 10:51:33, 165 views. In reply to 'Real class from Jimmy Beadle and possibly others…..'

hi nathan valentine gave my mum the medal

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 147.147.145.45

RE: Real class from Jimmy Beadle and possibly others….. by Stockton Seadog User: Stockton Seadog

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 15:19:07, 157 views. In reply to 'Real class from Jimmy Beadle and possibly others…..'

He should have been brought on for at least the last ten minutes, Walshaw looked knackered anyway.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.95.110.74

Thread: 91436

FT: Middlesbro 1-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 16/5/2018 at 21:26:03, 150 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:2

RE: FT: Middlesbro 1-0 Boro by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 16/5/2018 at 23:14:39, 132 views. In reply to 'FT: Middlesbro 1-0 Boro'

Boro played really well and it was only really the red card which changed the game as we were on top before that. Surprised that Wally missed (or rather had saved) the penalty as usually you’d put your house on such a goal going in. Unfortunately after the sending off it changed completely, and it was backs to the wall stuff, and although we rallied in the last 5 minutes we just couldn’t find that equaliser. If that was indeed the last time we’ll ever see Max then what a stage to bow out on. You could tell how much the boro fans appreciated the lads’ efforts tonight (and during the whole season).

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.62

Attendance: 1,019 n/t by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 08:00:23, 86 views. In reply to 'RE: FT: Middlesbro 1-0 Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.144

RE: RE: FT: Middlesbro 1-0 Boro by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 09:11:46, 82 views. In reply to 'RE: FT: Middlesbro 1-0 Boro'

Having watched the YouTube coverage, it was really interesting to see the game from the sort of angle you see on TV. Really showed us in a good light I thought. Lots of passing and movement, very patient in possession. Thought Sugden really stepped up, too, tenacious in winning back possession and excellent on the ball.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.24

RE: RE: RE: FT: Middlesbro 1-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 10:10:18, 75 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: FT: Middlesbro 1-0 Boro'

I’m looking forward to seeing a replay of the move that led up to the penalty. From memory it was a superb build up.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.53

Watch the whole game here: by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 10:16:38, 102 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: FT: Middlesbro 1-0 Boro'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yth_ti6g-c8

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.49.245.245

count the number of times a Boro player by Old Git

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 11:01:04, 130 views. In reply to 'Watch the whole game here:'

has his shoulder or shirt tugged
from behind.
See how many the ref penalised.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 51.6.5.238

I really don’t like the double jeopardy rule. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 11:18:00, 112 views. In reply to 'count the number of times a Boro player'

They should have gone down to ten men, as it was the last man, but because it was a penalty he couldn’t be sent off. Their bloke got pulled down 5 yards from the box, and Hewitt (rightly) get sent off.

Too much protection for players. If you’re daft enough to bring down the last man in the box, you deserve to go 1-0 down and be down to ten men.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.144

RE: I really don’t like the double jeopardy rule. by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 13:05:19, 107 views. In reply to 'I really don’t like the double jeopardy rule.'

From: http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10512322/laws-of-the-game-changes-ahead-of-the-201617-premier-league-season

CHANGE 3: An end to the ‘triple-punishment law’

The previous ‘triple-punishment’ law meant a player who denied a goal-scoring opportunity in the box was automatically red-carded and handed a suspension, as well as giving away a penalty.

The law has now been changed so players committing accidental fouls that deny goal-scoring opportunities in the penalty area will not be automatically sent off, with a yellow card sufficient punishment.

As the amendment states: “When a denial of a goalscoring opportunity offence is committed by a defender in the penalty area, the penalty kick effectively restores the goalscoring opportunity so the punishment for the player should be less strong (e.g. a yellow card) than when the offence is committed outside the penalty area. However, when the offence is handball or clearly not a genuine attempt to play or challenge for the ball, the player will be sent off."

—-

This means if there’s a large amount of time left, you’re arguably either better off letting them shoot/score, or risking a penalty and a yellow card, than taking them down outside the box and getting a man sent off.

At 1-0 down with 11 men, would we have been better off?

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.49.245.245

RE: RE: I really don’t like the double jeopardy rule. by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 21:08:52, 90 views. In reply to 'RE: I really don’t like the double jeopardy rule.'

Poor rule really. Having a free shot at goal is in no way comparable to playing with one player fewer for the rest of the game. I think the answer is probably to award a yellow card and a penalty where a clear goalscoring opportunity is denied, irrespective of where the foul occurs.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.24

RE: count the number of times a Boro player by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 17/5/2018 at 21:05:11, 90 views. In reply to 'count the number of times a Boro player'

Didn’t think the ref gave us much tbh. But then I rarely do! Three or four times Middlesbrough players kicked the ball away when a decision went against them - nothing doing - Sugden did it once and got booked.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.38.24

Thread: 91435

Nobody mention Aston Villa n/t by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 16/5/2018 at 17:41:39, 91 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.42

Thread: 91434

A few snippets from the Chester forum by SW11

Posted: 16/5/2018 at 16:11:10, 184 views.

http://deva-chat.com/thread/2685/scarborough-athletic

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.87
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.