Newest Message: RE: RE: re Help by Patto_89 on 18/6/2019, 21:08:56 - View Thread

3

Thread: 92103

Reasons by Joe90

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:31:41, 201 views.

Recent signings down to Hume?
Hume is a larger voice in the dressing room doesn’t always agree with SK
Hume dictates to much, blames him for low confidence
Hume gets sack before SK does as feels threatened by him

I have seen Hume on the touchline always seems to come across well, SK to quiet for me, seems unable to make quick/big decisions, I guess Bolds will be back although I’d like a complete fresh face

To many SK favourites in this team at the moment and the inability to drop them has been telling

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

Thread: 92102

mark hume by ian thomas

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 20:52:22, 328 views.

just heard mark Hume as left the club, is this true

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.112.199.181

True see official site. by Seamer unreg

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:06:45, 242 views. In reply to 'mark hume'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

RE: mark hume by Geoff hooley

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:07:29, 286 views. In reply to 'mark hume'

On Scarborough club site ,kitty’s sacked him!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.142.234.252

RE: RE: mark hume by seadog2019

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:28:18, 256 views. In reply to 'RE: mark hume'

Gutted Mark is one who always shows passion, I was convinced he would take over when steve eventually left.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 91.110.242.99

RE: RE: RE: mark hume by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:59:40, 285 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: mark hume'

This is what I don’t get… if it is not working, why get in the assistant manager as the manager. Why not a complete fresh start?!?!? What is the point of having an assistant manager come in when it is not working for the manager?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

Re: Re: Re: Re: Mark Hume by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 3/1/2019 at 09:45:11, 257 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: mark hume'

Confusion re: the decision to sack Hume. Obviously I don’t know what’s gone off behind the scenes, but it might be that Kittrick has allowed him to have too much of a say and wield too much influence, and in doing so has apportioned blame to him for our recent loss of form. But if that is the case, it also suggests a weakness in SK’s management capabilities if he has actually let that happen. It couild also have been been because Hume disagreed with him and was not a ‘yes man’ or it could also be that Hume is the fall guy when we as fans are demanding changes. We perhaps have to be careful what we ask for next time.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Mark Hume by BoroNo7 User: BoroNo7

Posted: 3/1/2019 at 11:13:50, 228 views. In reply to 'Re: Re: Re: Re: Mark Hume'

Putting to one side the personalities involved I have long been puzzled why a club at our level needs a Manager,Asst Manager,1st Team coach and a Goalkeeping coach.

I can see the logic of Reserve goalie/coach if the right person can be found, and it seems Tom Morgan fits that bill

The overlap to my mind is between the roles of Asst Manager/1st Team Coach, for the following reasons:-

- “too many cooks” - you can’t run a team by Committee and too many voices can cause confusion/conflict

- cost - in a club like ours we need to ensure overheads are kept to a minimum and that everyone involved is adding value

I hope that we don’t just rush out and fill the vacancy caused by Mark Hume’s departure in a like-for-manner before giving some thought to the points made above

Finally good luck to Mark Hume for the future

UTB

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

RE: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Mark Hume by Rockett Fuel User: Rockett Fuel

Posted: 3/1/2019 at 12:54:04, 220 views. In reply to 'Re:Re:Re:Re:Re: Mark Hume'

I would have had a bet on Merris being promoted from within when Bolds left. Again would fit the bill from a cost point of view.

*Evo-Stik Division 1 North Runners-Up 2017-18* *NCEL Premier Division Champions 2012-13* *NCEL Division 1 Champions 2008-09*

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Thread: 92101

I can’t put my finger on it by Southern dog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 20:10:41, 387 views.

Leon Scott seemed like a different player today. SK admitted the players lacked heart. His job to motivate. Surely players shouldn’t need motivation for a local derby.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.165.107

RE: I can’t put my finger on it by seadog2019

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 20:25:43, 314 views. In reply to 'I can’t put my finger on it '

How can players not be motivated, local derby tremendous away following, great atmosphere, well paid for the privilege of wearing the shirt.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 91.110.242.99

RE: I can’t put my finger on it by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 20:44:24, 387 views. In reply to 'I can’t put my finger on it '

Leon Scott looked like a different player today because he had a point to prove - Let’s be honest, against a bang average midfield we have. He was rubbish for us and still is not great. Just played well against his former team, which usually happens in those situations.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

sticky pitch ? by leicesterlad

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 23:01:57, 345 views. In reply to 'RE: I can’t put my finger on it '

SK wore out his fingers in his post match interview. Yet again the excuses start. Sticky horrable pitch (I assume Whitby played on the same pitch ) Whitby penalty not a penalty . Same old story from a manager who is slowly getting out of his depth at this level of football.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

I reckon we have by Chester Perry

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 23:49:40, 321 views. In reply to 'sticky pitch ?'

lost 6 out of the last 7, i’m not one to usually criticise but we have been playing shite for weeks now, all the players and the management duo need to take a long hard look at themselves and ask are they good enough and are they interested enough to represent us. this is absolutely no criticism against those unpaid volunteers who run the club and who do a splendid job, this is aimed purely at the paid playing and management staff, you owe us big style, I personally will miss the next 3 games due to work, but I’ve bought a season ticket so I’ve done my bit now please do yours.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.190.195.108

RE: I reckon we have by Cynic

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 09:22:31, 267 views. In reply to 'I reckon we have'

I don’t think a single player is performing particularly well at the moment (and even if it’s just some, logically it will make the others look poorer, just as others playing well can help an individual look better - does that make sense?). I don’t think Dave Merris is playing any better or worse than anyone else - in the games I’ve seen, which isn’t them all by a long way. I’d guess that we all have our favourites and those who are not and sometimes overlook the failings of the one whilst picking up on the failings of the other. Might you be doing this Borotomas? On the other hand you might be spot on - I don’t know.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.126

ps Supposed to be response to Borotomas in thread below. by cynic

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 09:24:17, 262 views. In reply to 'RE: I reckon we have'

Supposed to be response to Borotomas in thread below.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.126

RE: sticky pitch ? by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 16:22:58, 248 views. In reply to 'sticky pitch ?'

Out of his depth at this level of football? Are you having a laugh? The guy has managed in the conference national

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.233.15

RE: I can’t put my finger on it by Seamer unreg

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 13:43:02, 373 views. In reply to 'I can’t put my finger on it '

It may be as simple as the other teams how worked out how to play us. We have no pace anywhere so that doesn’t bother them. They bypass midfield and a pacy forward gets behind our static defence and is in on goal. They know that most of our goals come through Coulson and Wally so they close them down. We have no plan b, no one on the bench to change our game. It doesn’t take a lot to work us out. It’s up to the management to change our approach to our game now.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

Re re I can’t put my finger on ir by Steve0337

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 14:26:37, 271 views. In reply to 'RE: I can’t put my finger on it '

Perfectly put Seamer. Spot on..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.40.249.39

Thread: 92100

Interview with SK after loss at Whitby by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 17:52:08, 331 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-scarborough-athletic-boss-steve-kittrick-after-the-loss-against-whitby-1-9515628

Edited by admin on 01/01/19 at 17:56:06
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: Interview with SK after loss at Whitby by Geoff hooley

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 18:15:25, 275 views. In reply to 'Interview with SK after loss at Whitby'

Not sk ’s biggest fan ,but if a team won’t battle ! What can you do?.I think the team as found there level, and other teams have found us out. think Watson can do the job mid field.at least we won’t go down!😁

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.142

RE: RE: Interview with SK after loss at Whitby by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 20:47:59, 240 views. In reply to 'RE: Interview with SK after loss at Whitby'

I just don’t understand signing players like Watson and McGuire who don’t really improve our team. They are average at this level if you get my point - surely you want to be signing players with better quality than we have to improve the team. His signings since the start of the year haven’t really improved our quality - Lofts, Forrester, McGuire and Watson.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

Full backs by borotomas User: borotomas

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 08:49:50, 232 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Interview with SK after loss at Whitby'

He mentioned a lot of the team were passengers in he game but wouldn’t name any names which is fair enough. It’s easy to say when a player reaches a certain age and they hit bad form that ‘they’re passed it’ when that might not be the case but I’m struggling to see what Merris adds to the team at this difficult time. He’s not completing his passes, difficult when most are sent long, his clearences aren’t clear, I often see him make odd decisions such as lose possession but follow the ball and not pick up the spare man. In the bluntest possible terms, he’s been poor.
It’s clear Dave is a great guy and been brilliant around the club for a few years but I don’t think anyone should be undroppable.

Lacey hasn’t been consistent either, seems to be struggling with confidence which I’m sure they all are.

Just wondering if anyone had a different take on it?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.185.167

RE Fullbacks by Stepney Seadog 1

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 21:04:18, 132 views. In reply to 'Full backs'

Sorry borotomas, can’t agree with your criticism of Merris, if the rest of the team showed his commitment, then we would be in a better position now. His work rate belies his age, and when he loses possession (as they all do) he recovers well.As for the game itself, well the pitch was bad, but same for both teams. The real difference was simply that Whitby were more up for it than Boro, and it showed, even with the massive Boro support . Obviously their manager was aware of our goal threat, Walshaw and Coulson and nullified it with man -marking., and took advantage of the lack of pace in our defence.I thought the Whitby right fullback had both strength and pace, and their skipper Hopson stood out in midfield. Perhaps when considering new faces we should look Northwards where our most memorable players (Football league) originated from.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

Re: Loss at Whitby by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 10:00:32, 203 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Interview with SK after loss at Whitby'

Very worrying that the Manager does not know what is happening to us. Perhaps a start would be to analyse what we were doing well when on our winning streak as opposed to recent performances. I think he used a hammer to crack a nut by bringing in several midfield players after Dean got injured. He seems to be wholly focused on making changes and bringing in additions in that area of the pitch and remains steadfastly resolute ( except for forced absences) to keep the front and back the same. I can only think that he sees the midfield as the ‘problem?’ I, personally, did not see any reason to start meddling to such an extent when we were doing so well, but then I suppose that’s why I’m not a manager.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:b

RE: Re: Loss at Whitby by Ernie Moss’s towering headers

Posted: 2/1/2019 at 10:21:31, 198 views. In reply to 'Re: Loss at Whitby'

We’re on a very very poor run, good job there are points in the bank as we are relegation form. What is extremely worrying is that we have stopped creating chances. We didn’t have a single clear cut shot on target in the 2nd half yesterday and as a team we have run out of ideas, even more so when we go behind and the heads go down. Confidence is shot, the players look shit scared to be honest and it’s up to the management to change the mentality but i’m not sure they know how.

I recommend everyone read’s Leon Scott’s tweet from yesterday when someone asked him why he never played like that for us. His reply " Trust, belief and respect all play big factors in players performance and attitude"

Makes you wonder what the hell is going on behind the scenes, especially when new players are brought in and with all respect to them, aren’t an improvement.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 83.219.57.2

Thread: 92099

Today’s results (boro 5th) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 17:37:39, 146 views.

Grantham 2-1 Basford
Hednesford 0-1 Farsley
Hyde 1-1 Buxton
Marine 3-1 Lancaster
Matlock 0-2 Gainsborough
Mickelover 3-2 Stafford
Nantwich 0-1 Witton
South Shields 6-2 North Ferriby
Warrington 2-0 Bamber Bridge
Whitby 2-0 Boro
Workington 1-2 Stalybridge

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Thread: 92098

Signings this year by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:20:31, 204 views.

Just thinking about the signings this year, how many of them have been effective?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.234.18

its only 16 hours old, give em chance. by Dunno

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:26:03, 190 views. In reply to 'Signings this year '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: its only 16 hours old, give em chance. by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:28:18, 155 views. In reply to 'its only 16 hours old, give em chance.'

Hahaha I mean signings this season! If only I could change the post…

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

Thread: 92097

Boro defence by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:12:26, 251 views.

Sounds like we were deservedly beaten today, but that’s now 17 goals conceded in the last 8 league games.

When you’re shipping an average of more than 2 goals a game you ain’t gonna pick up many points (and please, don’t anyone tell me it’s because Gooda was missing today - because he’s played in most of those games).

Edited on 01/01/19 at 16:16:00
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Agreed by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:14:11, 219 views. In reply to 'Boro defence'

Our defensive play has been far less than the sum of our defenders in recent games. Too many off performances all round. It’s immensely frustrating.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Woeful all round. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:30:03, 234 views. In reply to 'Agreed'

It was more of the same today. Whitby Town were nothing special, but took the lead in the first half and scored a softly awarded second-half penalty.

The referee was shocking: Boro players fouled and even stamped on in one case - the latter being completely ignored by the permanently smirking official. Do they just get anyone off the street in Whitby to officiate the match?

We should have got back into the game late on but Coulson fluffed the penalty. Nevertheless, by then Boro heads had gone down and Whitby could have made it three late on when they struck the post from range.

Conditions for away supporters were pretty bad, with access being across a muddy stretch of land, and there were just three very rundown cheap and nasty plastic portaloos for over six hundred visiting fans!

In summary, something drastic needs to happen. Quickly.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:e07:7300:7

RE: Woeful all round. by geoff hooley

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 16:41:55, 213 views. In reply to 'Woeful all round.'

get ready for sk, reasons , not taking chances & mistakes at back. 3 points outer possible 15 . happy new year.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:74b0:db00:

RE: RE: Woeful all round. by Athletico seadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 18:58:21, 223 views. In reply to 'RE: Woeful all round.'

We were shite today. Lacking in all departments. Sadly including effort & heart.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.46

Thread: 92096

YCR by Southern dog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:27:16, 210 views.

Can’t get it to work. Anybody else having problems?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: YCR by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:31:08, 154 views. In reply to 'YCR'

I’m no having any issues at all. Coming through loud and clear.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: RE: YCR by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:33:32, 158 views. In reply to 'RE: YCR'

not been playing since half time, been trying on iPhone & laptop

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

YCR Extra by Suffolk Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:38:39, 161 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: YCR'

Nope, nothing here either – phone, iPad or desktop.
All ‘play’ buttons on their website come up as “Error loading"
Probably a censorship issue to spare me the grim reality of the game…

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.46

Had nowt in second half.. did they pack up early like Boro.? by Borotillidie User: Borotillidie

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:49:08, 169 views. In reply to 'YCR Extra'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.149.44.193

Thread: 92095

Boro line-up today by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 13:08:27, 163 views.

1. Taylor
2. Lacey
3. Merris
4. Dixon
5. Killock
6. Burgess
7. Watson*
8. Valentine
9. Walshaw
10. Coulson
11. Lofts

Subs: Morgan, McGuire, Johnson, Bowman

* Cadman was originally selected to play no. 7 but injured himself in the warm up.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: Boro line-up today by Geoff hooley

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 13:17:49, 137 views. In reply to 'Boro line-up today'

What happened to brooksby?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.142.234.252

Latest: WHITBY (Gell 25′) 1-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 13:24:37, 130 views. In reply to 'RE: Boro line-up today'


Edited on 01/01/19 at 13:25:00
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Wtf.. becoming embarrassing.. by Borotillidie User: Borotillidie

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 13:39:44, 205 views. In reply to 'Latest: WHITBY (Gell 25′) 1-0 Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.149.44.193

HT: Whitby 1-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 13:46:13, 137 views. In reply to 'Wtf.. becoming embarrassing..'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Latest: WHITBY (Hopson, pen) 2-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:30:35, 131 views. In reply to 'HT: Whitby 1-0 Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

2-0 Whitby soft pen by Old Git

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:31:02, 154 views. In reply to 'HT: Whitby 1-0 Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

MISSED PEN (Coulson) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:38:45, 163 views. In reply to '2-0 Whitby soft pen'

Saved by Whitby keeper

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Attendance 1318 n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:44:46, 133 views. In reply to 'MISSED PEN (Coulson)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Full-Time: Whitby 2-0 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 14:53:37, 152 views. In reply to 'Attendance 1318 n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Thread: 92094

Happy New Year to all seadogs old and new by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 00:54:06, 108 views.

Let’s hope it’s a good year starting with a win at Whitby

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Thread: 92093

Bad news for Whitby Defense. by Seamer unreg.

Posted: 31/12/2018 at 19:06:34, 267 views.

Defender Toby Lees has been re-called by his parent club Harrogate Town and will not be availabe for tomorrow’s game v Scarborough Athletic.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.134.172.41

Chance to punish them then. by Aylesbury Seadog

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 01:20:11, 240 views. In reply to 'Bad news for Whitby Defense. '

Just hope our defence is up to it today!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

No Bailey of course by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/1/2019 at 10:03:27, 170 views. In reply to 'Chance to punish them then.'

so it’s one key miss for both sides at the back.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Thread: 92092

Will the bar at the ground be open to both sets of supporte? by Seamer unreg

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:42:29, 301 views.

They have just had it refurbished so could be worth a visit. Opens at 11am On Tuesday I believe.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

RE: Will the bar at the ground be open to both sets of supporte? by Whitby fan

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 22:13:53, 325 views. In reply to 'Will the bar at the ground be open to both sets of supporte?'

Nope. open to Whitby fans only.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Thread: 92091

END. OF. THE.WORLD. by Dunno

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:30:53, 305 views.

I honestly don’t see the worries that some people have with the current state of the team and the fact we haven’t won 25 of our 24 games so far, without letting a goal in, without the ball being played forward once in the air, with Kittrick making 6 substitutions per match. Some of you need to calm down, take a deep breath and look what we have in front of us.

One year ago, I know I would have settled for being promoted that season, then in a play-off position going into a New Years Day away match at Whitby with 600+ tickets sold. Be thankful for what we have chaps and chapesses.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e1c:c800:d

You forgot… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:36:57, 268 views. In reply to 'END. OF. THE.WORLD.'

With Kittrick so far forward out of his dugout that he’s actually on the pitch in front of the linesman

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Yeah but by Cynic

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:48:13, 236 views. In reply to 'You forgot…'

It’s still OK to be worried or comment about recent form and general performance levels (even when winning) isn’t it? Or isn’t it? Just so we know the rules…

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.198

RE: Yeah but by Dunno

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:57:29, 218 views. In reply to 'Yeah but'

Am I okay to comment about people commenting about recent results? Who knows. Maybe site admin could advise? Maybe we could have a vote and set some ground rules to avoid future confusion.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.160

RE: RE: Yeah but by Cynic

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:23:33, 217 views. In reply to 'RE: Yeah but'

Good response!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.180

RE: RE: RE: Yeah but by Geoff hooley

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:31:53, 210 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Yeah but'

I thought that was the whole idea of a forum. To pass opinions and comments. whether good or bad .or have we to say all’s well with the world.?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.27

RE: RE: RE: RE: Yeah but by Dunno

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:35:14, 190 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Yeah but'

But I think all is well with the world, am I not okay to say that? Just look where we are.

I refer you to Mr Smith’s rule number 2 below, its okay to criticise criticism.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: RE: RE: Yeah but by Dunno

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:32:24, 217 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Yeah but'

ha ha cheers.

Im just frustrated that its our team and we should show it unconditional love, just like you should your kids. We are in a completely different situation to a privately owned club where we can shout at the owners if things aren’t going right, we are the owners so we are effectively shouting at ourselves when things don’t go right. Leave it up to the board to make difficult decisions.

The fans should show nothing but 100% support and positivity, no matter what. If we keep losing then no doubt the right decision will be made, but we should go up to Whitby on Tuesday and be nothing but very vocally supportive of all players and management. We could make a right racket up there. What wold you rather play football in front of? Fans who are going to groan and shout at every mistake, or ones who pick you up no matter what.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e1c:c800:d

RE: RE: RE: RE: Yeah but by Cynic

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:45:41, 207 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Yeah but'

We should always try and support the team on the pitch but alternatively surely this should be the place where we express (positive and negative) opinions? Nothing wrong with your opinion about the season and where we are (a lot of basic truth in it) and I’m quite happy with where we are in the league, I’m not that happy with how we are playing ( I wasn’t when we were clear at the top of the table either). The two things are different and different people will give different weight to the two things. Obs if top of league and playing well then we’re all happy (probably).

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.180

fair enough by Dunno

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:57:49, 191 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Yeah but'

I don’t disagree with you there.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e1c:c800:d

Admin rules.. by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:29:12, 256 views. In reply to 'RE: Yeah but'

It’s ok to criticise
It’s ok to criticise criticism
It’s ok to change your mind to bring it in line with admin
It’s not ok to complain about someone pointing out where you are wrong
It’s ok for admin to delete posts where it is pointed out they are wrong

Defamation is bad, donations are good.

Insults are frowned upon, sarcasm is always funny.

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.182.113.176

RE: Admin rules.. by Cynic

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:34:33, 215 views. In reply to 'Admin rules..'

As ever will comply with all points (apart from the donations, it’s not like it’s Xmas is it?)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.180

Thread: 92090

Today’s results (Boro 5th) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:01:53, 178 views.

Basford 2-3 Warrington
Mickleover 1-0 Marine
South Shields 4-1 Workington
Witton 2-3 Farsley

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

RE: Today’s results (Boro 5th) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:32:18, 175 views. In reply to 'Today’s results (Boro 5th) '

Nothing at all for us to cheer about looking at those results.

Not much seems to be going our way at the moment. Hopefully the start of 2019 and the Whitby game will see a change in fortunes.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

You say that… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:36:02, 163 views. In reply to 'RE: Today’s results (Boro 5th) '

But for me we’re playing for 5th anyway. The current top 4 will no doubt fill those positions in some order or other, and any team out of us, Basford, Gainsborough, Matlock, Buxton and maybe Hyde will take 5th. So arguably Basford losing was good for us.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: You say that… by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 18:18:24, 167 views. In reply to 'You say that…'

I see what you are saying. You really think those top 4 spots are already nailed on?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

RE: RE: You say that… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 19:00:52, 208 views. In reply to 'RE: You say that…'

I think so cos we’ve got too much to do!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: RE: RE: You say that… by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 30/12/2018 at 16:59:45, 194 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: You say that…'

Yes but we’ve still got 18 games in which to do it. If we can go on another winning run anything is possible.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.22

RE: RE: RE: RE: You say that… by Geoff hooley

Posted: 30/12/2018 at 18:53:07, 285 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: You say that…'

10th or 12 th y

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:74b0:db00:

Thread: 92089

cod game by tim

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 22:05:40, 374 views.

how many tickets we sold?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:6680:f800:

RE: cod game by TheGoodWillOut

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 12:58:47, 281 views. In reply to 'cod game'

Official tweet said away travel is full with in excess of 600 sold. Not sure if this 600 includes people going up in cars etc

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: RE: cod game by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 15:29:50, 235 views. In reply to 'RE: cod game'

Oh it will do. I can’t for one moment imagine us taking 12 coaches lol

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Three coaches… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 29/12/2018 at 17:51:39, 212 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: cod game'

see official site for pickup details http://www.scarboroughathletic.com/news/2018-12-30/supporters-information-for-whitby-game

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: Three coaches… by Seamer unreg

Posted: 30/12/2018 at 11:01:41, 228 views. In reply to 'Three coaches…'

I see that Whitby fans are still able to purchase tickets for the game today and New Year’s Eve.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.155.20.228

Thread: 92088

Why ? by Stepney Seadog1 1

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 15:01:08, 243 views.

The players must obviously feel the effect of the poor results in the same way as the supporters. Looking at the table and trying to assess why the slump it becomes apparent that our best results were mostly playing teams now in the lower half of the table, and now that we are playing the better teams our performances have slumped. One other factor is IMO the loss of Max Wright, as not only did he score goals, but his pace and passing gave our two front men the space they are not having now. The logic being that if the ball is in the opponents half…..they won’ score. Involving the goalkeeper as a defender, will always be risky, South Shields, whilst not up to last seasons ability, put us on the back foot constantly, and got their rewards. I personally pre season would have settled for mid table, so let us all get behind the lads and give them our support whether winning or losing

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.160

Thread: 92087

Christmas draw by Filey1

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 13:38:51, 133 views.

What were the winning numbers??

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

Thread: 92086

😡 by Geoff hooley

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 19:40:39, 255 views.

Two players leave before match ends ,not happy chappys.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.100

RE: 😡 by Cynic

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 19:47:44, 275 views. In reply to '😡'

Who?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.126

RE: RE: 😡 by Ray McHales Bangers & Mash

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 20:20:50, 272 views. In reply to 'RE: 😡'

Heard Killock was one, but then saw him later on so who knows. Feel for him as our current CB’s have errors in them every game

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

RE: RE: 😡 by Geoff hooley

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 21:03:09, 258 views. In reply to 'RE: 😡'

Killock &i think other jowett.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.142

RE: RE: RE: 😡 by Geoff hooley

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 21:05:36, 255 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: 😡'

If not jowett the player who came in for cover up front.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.142

RE: RE: RE: RE: 😡 by Cynic

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 21:45:17, 345 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: 😡'

Makes some kind of sense, Killock was pushed into full-back role in early games (wasn’t very good) but hasn’t had much run at CB whilst both Bailey Gooda and Burgess have made clangers. One for the manager to deal with.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.186

Killock by Fendog

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 06:54:51, 267 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: 😡'

If I was Killock I’d keep walking.
Too good to be not getting a game.
Cadman is quite happy to be the Scape goat all the time when actually one of our better performers. Not Killock. Tell KitKat where to go with his favourites.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

RE: Killock by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 08:36:17, 261 views. In reply to 'Killock'

Hopefully Killock isn’t you then, as we need a ready made replacement with Gooda now suspended

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Re Killock by Fendog

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 09:38:35, 241 views. In reply to 'RE: Killock'

Treat out fringe players better then because who knows when we’ll need them.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Re: Killock by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 09:49:15, 242 views. In reply to 'Killock'

I can’t imagine that any player is “quite happy to be the scapegoat “ it’s widely known that Cadman likes it at Scarborough and takes his chances when he actually gets them. Everyone (except the Manager it seems) appreciates his efforts, mentality and talent. But other than doing what he does, it’s difficult to overcome something that has no sound reasoning except a personal preference, especially when it is the manager’s. When doing everything he can and is still out of favour, for him, it is what it is. I commend him for this because like Killock, I would not want to see a good player leave our club.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.83

Fendog by Re Killock

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 10:24:52, 267 views. In reply to 'Re: Killock'

Do I remember correctly when KB was suspended and RK came in, got MOM then dropped so KB could come back in ?
How’s that right ? What’s it say to that player ?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

RE: Fendog by Chester Perry

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 13:39:18, 188 views. In reply to 'Fendog'

I certainly hope Killock stays, i would have him in the team all day long on the evidence i’ve seen.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

Re re Killock. by Steve0337

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 13:38:48, 233 views. In reply to 'Re: Killock'

I rate him. We now need him as Bailey has a ban looming.. Going on to Cadders, he should be one of the first names on the team sheet every week. Everyone thinks so except Kittrick. He happily plays Forrester, Lofts or Brooks by ahead of him.. He is the manager and I have to respect his decision but I struggle, like most of us to understand it. I struggle to get the Johnson selection too. He may turnout to be decent in time but not yet. I think reality is beginning to set in.. We are a top eight team only. That is a decent first season. Great start but the better teams are showing us exactly where we are.. It will get better but that will take a number of players out with the same coming in.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.197.121.156

RE: Re re Killock. by Chester Perry

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 13:41:26, 221 views. In reply to 'Re re Killock. '

and like everyone else, i think Cadders is a no brainer, always rated him.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.87

RE: RE: Re re Killock. by original seadogx

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 14:33:07, 236 views. In reply to 'RE: Re re Killock. '

As long as he is available I would expect Cadman to get a run in the team from here on in. Also Killock will get his chance once Gooda is suspended.

I am also not sure why anybody would be giving up on the play offs at this stage, we could easily have been out of sight by half time vs south shields, and there’s plenty of football left to be played this season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.148

RE: Re re Killock. by geoff hooley

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 16:35:23, 244 views. In reply to 'Re re Killock. '

you might understand better if you knew that sk ,s partner is johnstons dad.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.142

“SK’s partner is Johnson’s dad” by Dan

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 21:32:30, 232 views. In reply to 'RE: Re re Killock. '

Wait.

What?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.249

News to me lol n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 21:34:47, 196 views. In reply to '“SK’s partner is Johnson’s dad”'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

The word ‘business’ may be missing… n/t by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 28/12/2018 at 21:40:05, 203 views. In reply to 'News to me lol n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Thread: 92085

New years day match massive now by Leeds seadog 27

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 10:20:20, 221 views.

Looking at the table and our form, I think we need to win nyd. I think if we were to lose I don’t see us realistically pulling the form around to claim a playoff spot.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Thread: 92084

Golden gamble yesterday by Peasholm

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 10:02:29, 180 views.

Anyone know the golden gamble number yesterday, we couldn’t hear it on the far side of the ground. I didn’t see the board go round the ground but I might have missed it. Guess it was claimed but wouldn’t mind knowing.

Wonder if it would be possible for it to be put on the Twitter feed when they announce the attendance for future games.
Thanks.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.180

RE: Golden gamble yesterday by geoff hooley

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 12:52:04, 214 views. In reply to 'Golden gamble yesterday'

could,nt even find out in the bar , why not pin it up near tele screens

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:74b0:db00:

Golden gamble by Helen hobson

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 16:41:51, 168 views. In reply to 'RE: Golden gamble yesterday'

Can’t remember the number, however it was claimed

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.225

35949 for £162.00. by SAFC Admin

Posted: 27/12/2018 at 19:31:47, 131 views. In reply to 'Golden gamble yesterday'

There are boards ready to go up in the ground so folk can see the winning numbers. However, if anyone has some free time to assist in this small matter, please do make yourself known

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.237.86
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.