Newest Message: RE: RE: re Help by Patto_89 on 18/6/2019, 21:08:56 - View Thread

3

Thread: 92447

Max Wright could make an appearance by Old Git

Posted: 28/5/2019 at 10:07:44, 214 views.

when Boro host Grimsby in a PSF on Tuesday 23rd July 7.30 ko
spotted on facebook so see official site or @safc
should be more details there

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.72.230.78

Thread: 92446

Gateshead troubles by Seasick Seadog User: Seasick Seadog

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 14:50:48, 242 views.

Anyone else think Tom White maybe available? Would be worth a punt

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.229.39.97

RE: Gateshead troubles by Seadog93

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 15:36:26, 228 views. In reply to 'Gateshead troubles'

Really can’t see him moving from full time to part time and after having a great season

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.164.119

Tom White by Duncan

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 21:10:20, 214 views. In reply to 'RE: Gateshead troubles'

A top quality player well thought of in the conference so I doubt it but I would go BIG for him as he would protect the back four better than anyone did last season. He did love his loan period and if we were flexible on training I would be optimistic .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:da65:8600:5

RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Boro345

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 21:52:35, 240 views. In reply to 'RE: Gateshead troubles'

Wouldn’t surprise me if he ended up at South Shields if he left Gateshead

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:7b11:d800:

RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Sick Boy unreg

Posted: 26/5/2019 at 08:10:34, 248 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

Class player. Should be playing league two football imo. Or at worst Hartlepool, Harrogate, Spennymoor, Darlo?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.70.158.186

RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 26/5/2019 at 14:03:33, 249 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

I feel we owe a massive debt to both Tom White and Max Wright to help gain us promotion the previous season. We really missed them this past season & the team dynamic was not the same.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.144.21.5

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 26/5/2019 at 18:47:14, 227 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

Bullshit

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Anon

Posted: 26/5/2019 at 18:51:59, 242 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

…is what you usually talk Geoff, you seriously thought Max Wright didn’t help us get promotion??

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.147.208.109

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 26/5/2019 at 21:40:35, 232 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

He played a good part ,what did white do ?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 27/5/2019 at 17:39:12, 203 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

Tom White was one of our best players during the second half of that season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.251.107

RE:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 27/5/2019 at 00:10:43, 248 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

Bullshit? Come on Geoff no need for that. I see you get constantly heckled on here & I’ve tried to give you the benefit of the doubt but it doesn’t help your case with comments like that. Sure Tom White was not in the same bracket as Max but I thought he fitted in well & was better than most we had this last season. All about opinions I suppose.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.144.21.5

RE: RE:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by geoff hooley

Posted: 27/5/2019 at 08:17:10, 243 views. In reply to 'RE:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

apologies

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: RE: RE:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 27/5/2019 at 22:02:21, 258 views. In reply to 'RE: RE:RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Gateshead troubles'

Accepted thank you.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.144.21.5

Thread: 92445

Scarborough Athletic Legends v Scarborough FC Legends… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 19:08:25, 289 views.

Taking place at the Flamingo Land Stadium on Saturday July 6th.
Part of a Boro fun day, with an afterparty at Scholars Bar in town.
All proceeds to the new stand fund and also local diabetes, my son is a type one diabetic.
More details to follow…

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 151.228.195.46

RE: Scarborough Athletic Legends v Scarborough FC Legends… by Sick boy unreg

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 22:45:56, 290 views. In reply to 'Scarborough Athletic Legends v Scarborough FC Legends…'

Can’t wait for this. Hope Scotty Phillips is involved - to this day probably my favourite Athletic player.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:9852:c000:b

RE: RE: Scarborough Athletic Legends v Scarborough FC Legends… by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 16:36:10, 202 views. In reply to 'RE: Scarborough Athletic Legends v Scarborough FC Legends…'

Considering how much younger the Scarborough athletic players will be, it could be an interestingly level playing field against ex full time pros :)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 148.252.129.36

RE: RE: RE: Scarborough Athletic Legends v Scarborough FC Legends… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 18:03:15, 194 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Scarborough Athletic Legends v Scarborough FC Legends…'

wonder which team Blotty and Coulo and Beadle will play for ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.252.172

RE: RE: RE: RE: Scarborough Athletic Legends v Scarborough FC Legends… by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 25/5/2019 at 18:36:08, 208 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Scarborough Athletic Legends v Scarborough FC Legends…'

Maybe they’ll play for athletic in the first half and then wear wigs and have Botox for the second half to re-enact their teenage SFC days

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 148.252.129.36

Thread: 92444

Nathan Valentine ‘gutted’ to leave Scarborough Athletic by Old Git

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 18:46:18, 213 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/sport/football/nathan-valentine-gutted-to-leave-scarborough-athletic-1-9784512

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.72.216.14

Thread: 92443

SFC Legends event by Midlandseadog (in Cov)

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 18:33:37, 164 views.

Gutted to discover that all tickets have gone so a bit of a plea to anyone who has 2 spare (for self and son)
Would love to finally shake hands with my all time favourite player - Jeff Barmby and chat to the other legends.
UTB

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 84.64.144.215

Thread: 92442

Changeover of playing staff by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 22/5/2019 at 23:28:55, 218 views.

I’ve had a bit of a think about this recently. How many people actually thought we were good enough to be promoted last season? Even when we were top I had my concerns about how we would compete in the league above. Don’t get me wrong I thought the squad did really well considering we were in the league below, the previous season. Overall I will count last season as a success and massively thank all the players for their part. We all tend to get attached to players and I am no exception but for the club to grow it is almost inevitable that some players will become victims of their, and the club’s, success as we move up the leagues (hopefully and in good time). JD has a proven record at this level of getting promotions & we should all give him our full backing because he obviously knows what standard of player we need to win this league which I feel is quite tough. Points wise we were well below the top two and so a major rethink would be required to bridge that gap. Boro has had one heck of a journey since NCEL div 1 and the players we started with - we should see it as progressive evolution and I for one thank greatly all those who contributed not just last year but for the past 12 years to get us to where we are now. Really looking forward to next season.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.111

Re: changeover of playing staff by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 07:07:56, 206 views. In reply to 'Changeover of playing staff'

I agree totally with your post Burniston. However, with regard to changeover of players, I was disappointed at a couple of departures and also a bit surprised that, considering throughout the season, supporters on all platforms have commented on our defensive frailties, errors and even culpabilities for losses on some occasions, that basically, with the exception of Killock and Williamson, they all remain.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:1

Defensive frailties …. by Cynic Al

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 15:12:22, 171 views. In reply to 'Re: changeover of playing staff'

You said that ‘they all remain’ except two.

I cannot remember, and you may be able to correct me, a statement saying that Gooda and/or Burgess are intending to play for us next year. Neither were in the ‘contracted’ list that included Coulo, Tommy, Johnson, Brooksbythat was released earlier (as far as I remember).

I guess that those players who have already left were a ‘not required’ and the remaining players (I think you could include Watson and McNaughton here) might still be talking to/negotiating with us and/or other clubs.

I can’t remember a statement confirming Merris’ status next season. Is he a coach, player/coach or player ?

I believe that JD has had small(ish) squads when he has managed at this level before. I think the stat I was quoted was that when he won the league at Farsley he had a squad of 18 at the beginning of the season. Of the 18, 15 were still with the club at the end of that season. Maybe he got lucky, or maybe that’s his MO. He does seem to be making decisions about the squad rather than letting it ‘drift on’ and players get frustrated and leave.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 37.72.113.170

Re: Defensive Frailties by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 16:09:58, 176 views. In reply to 'Defensive frailties ….'

Perhaps it was my misinterpretation of the 7 on the released list - I assumed that the list was finite in terms of who JD didn’t want. I accept that some others may leave of their own volition because they’ve had better offers elsewhere, but my assumption was that the 7 had been released to make way for the new players to join those who had not been place on the released list to make up the squad for next season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:1

RE: Re: Defensive Frailties by Rockett Fuel User: Rockett Fuel

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 22:20:07, 170 views. In reply to 'Re: Defensive Frailties'

We’ve signed eight new players thus far, four of whom are defenders (plus a utility player) - surely that’s a sign that the manager thinks it’s an area that needed strengthening?

*Evo-Stik Division 1 North Runners-Up 2017-18* *NCEL Premier Division Champions 2012-13* *NCEL Division 1 Champions 2008-09*

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.178.195.139

RE: Changeover of playing staff by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 16:22:21, 183 views. In reply to 'Changeover of playing staff'

It’s funny your post on position.when I posted the team was,nt good enough ,I was ridiculed.after saying we would finish 12th or there abouts..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: RE: Changeover of playing staff by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 17:31:51, 187 views. In reply to 'RE: Changeover of playing staff'

Whilst not particularly agreeing with some of your posts Geoff I don’t recall ridiculing them myself. If I had a motto it would be to keep a positive mental attitude and that is why I don’t like players being personally shot down on here even though I might agree with some of the sentiments posted on here at times - I try to keep them to myself and that includes pitch-side. We really should have finished at least 7th but for an inexplicable TT venture at South Shields so 12th was a bit doom and gloom really and we were much better than that. As our final position proved, you were correct by saying the team wasn’t good enough but it is best to grow slowly and steadily and don’t forget, the team was good enough to get us to the highest ever league position in the club’s history and win a cup final that we have never won before.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.144.21.5

RE: RE: RE: Changeover of playing staff by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 23/5/2019 at 19:50:23, 173 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Changeover of playing staff'

My post was,by aimed at you mate. My motto is the players have to take the good with the bad .the team where good ,but not good enough ,new manager as realised that ,just hope he as,nt gone over board with contracts ,think that was kt s downfall.it will be interesting me thinks😇

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

Thread: 92441

New players ! by Stepney Seadog 1

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 21:57:07, 291 views.

Contrary to some of the threads questioning the new arrivals, I believe that our manager has chosen his pick of the Tadcaster side . He has only been with us for the end of season games yet he has assessed what type of player he wants and what he expects of them. Clearly he feels that strength and pace are his priorities and on checking the Wiki. ratings , it would appear that most have played at a higher level. In the majority they have played together at Tadcaster, who łwere a better side than their table position showed. I am pretty certain that Taddy would have wished to retain most. After over seven decades of supporting Boro I still get a buzz waiting for the new season. A new manager, new stand, and a new team. Up the Boro. !

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e36:700:de

Quando quando quando by Derek Abbey’s barnet

Posted: 22/5/2019 at 23:16:13, 208 views. In reply to 'New players !'

If you think any of these signings collectively are better than Vallo individually then I’ll give you Charlie charollis email address.

Chris Howarth??????

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 213.122.87.225

RE: Quando quando quando by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 24/5/2019 at 14:48:45, 192 views. In reply to 'Quando quando quando'

He might well be equally as good. We haven’t seen him play yet.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.93.12

RE: RE: Quando quando quando by Derek Abbey’s barnet

Posted: 24/5/2019 at 23:09:22, 179 views. In reply to 'RE: Quando quando quando'

I have (plenty) - he isn’t (by a long chalk - white chalk, he likes white)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 46.208.101.156

Thread: 92440

One Tommy Taylor, three trophies by Stockton Seadog User: Stockton Seadog

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 16:45:45, 168 views.

Player’s Player - Tommy Taylor.

Manager’s Player - James Walshaw.

Golden Boot - James Walshaw.

Alan Moffatt Trophy (Away Player) - Tommy Taylor.

Supporters’ Player - Tommy Taylor.

Under-19s Player of the Year - Nathan Walker.

Well deserved.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 83.148.226.159

Thread: 92439

Tadborough by Stockton Seadog User: Stockton Seadog

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 16:39:30, 226 views.

Chris Howarth signs.

Six from Tadcaster now.

Edited on 21/05/19 at 16:40:35
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 83.148.226.159

RE: Tadborough by Cynic

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 16:41:20, 207 views. In reply to 'Tadborough'

Hmmm sounds a tad too many.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.23.90.185

I’m going for the more industrial sounding Scarcaster by Old Git

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 19:08:27, 213 views. In reply to 'RE: Tadborough'

where it’s steel, coal, the birthplace of bipedal, humanoid, robot cricketer, Dread Human
and permanently sometime summer 1966-68 in the County Championship.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 88.144.10.235

Thread: 92438

3 Boro players depart for pastures new by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 20/5/2019 at 23:34:51, 266 views.

Killock, Valentine and Cadman. Thanks to all for their efforts in a Boro shirt

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.88.139

Re: Pastures New by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 07:06:10, 199 views. In reply to '3 Boro players depart for pastures new'

Gutted and a bit nonplussed- if Deacey is supposed to be in to ‘playing football’ why has he got rid of one of our most creative footballers? Cadders will be unforgettable for me after his Stratford heroics. Oh well, thanks and all the best to all three wherever they go.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:1

..and there’s four more by beckywitch User: beckywitch

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 08:18:33, 209 views. In reply to '3 Boro players depart for pastures new'

Williamson, Dixon, Forrester, Dean

Suppose with all the new faces some have to leave but it’s sad to see them go

beckywitch

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:8673:d700:a

RE: ..and there’s four more by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 09:47:50, 183 views. In reply to '..and there’s four more'

This seems to be the first season I can remember where players have departed en masse, as opposed to in dribs and drabs. Deacey clearly believes in announcing a “retained list"

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.88.139

Pleased …. by Cynic Al

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 12:50:35, 159 views. In reply to 'RE: ..and there’s four more'

I think John Deacey has done the right thing.

Not that the players he is ‘letting go’ are bad players. They have all been part of our journey. There is no way that he could have kept all the new signings and last year’s squad happy.

One of the SK criticisms from last year was about the way he treated Sam Hewitt and the fact that Sam felt he was not really given a chance. By being ‘up front’ and making decisions that criticism cannot be levied in the same way.

Also, we do not actually know what has happened here …. it could be any of the three options below or a multitude of other options….
a) he has rung/met them and said, you are not in my plans
b) he has rung/met them offered them an opportunity to be in the squad (maybe not the first XI) and they have declined
c) he has rung/met them with a deal on less money or money that does not meet their own valuation of themselves, so they have declined

I think the fundamental thing I am saying is that when we consider who we would like to keep we have no idea about their financial expectations and the budget that JD is working within (same as, more than, or less than SK ?), we also have no idea about player X who is available at the same or less money.

Cynic Al

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 37.72.113.170

RE: 3 Boro players depart for pastures new by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 12:08:06, 161 views. In reply to '3 Boro players depart for pastures new'

Sad & sorry to see all these 3 go, they have all been massive. Many thanks for your time at Boro & I hope you all find what is right for you.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.111

RE: RE: 3 Boro players depart for pastures new by Cynic

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 12:17:13, 153 views. In reply to 'RE: 3 Boro players depart for pastures new'

All about opinions of course but release of Cadman (especially if we are committed to playing better football) seems like a potential blunder to me. Wouldn’t be surprised if this doesn’t come back to bite us at some point - thanks to the others, Vallo especially for commitment to the cause.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.23.89.128

RE: 3 Boro players depart for pastures new by Ernie Moss’s towering headers

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 12:12:22, 146 views. In reply to '3 Boro players depart for pastures new'

Let’s hope these new players brought in from lower league’s to replace all the departing step up, make the grade and are an improvement. I’m not so sure they will but having not seen them play cant really comment.
I’m slightly concerned about next season in all honesty, too many imports from a team who didn’t do fantastic things in the division below us and this league is a big step up. The pre season friendlies will be watched with great interest!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 83.219.57.2

Why dont managers rate Cadman ? by deep seadog User: deep seadog

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 12:31:38, 163 views. In reply to 'RE: 3 Boro players depart for pastures new'

Like a lot of others I was a big fan and I think when he started his record of assists was outstanding, but none of our previous managers have really trusted him and he has always struggled to get starts. there must be factors we are not aware of ? and yes it does seem strange that so many players from a team that underperformed massively last year in a league below is puzzling but we can only put faith in the manager and back his judgement.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.141.240.130

Cadman & Valentine really rated those two and think we will by Old Git

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 13:05:50, 168 views. In reply to 'Why dont managers rate Cadman ?'

miss them. Cadman for his skill & Vallo for his effort, determination & bite.
Good luck in the future and hope they both get a good team.
Can see us coming up against them soon and suffering for it.
The other main worry has been highlighted already.
We’re signing players from below rather than above.
I watched a few games at Pickering and never spotted one player who would improve us.
Also saw several games at Whitby, in our league, and never thought, ‘oh, he’d be good in our side.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 88.144.10.235

RE: Cadman & Valentine by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 13:18:43, 174 views. In reply to 'Cadman & Valentine really rated those two and think we will'

Fully agree about those two but I think we have to trust JD that he knows what he is doing. Some of the guys we have signed from Taddy were chosen to form the ‘team of the division’ so despite the team of Taddy not quite doing it, these lads should shine and be hungry. I don’t always think it is necessarily a good thing to get players from the division above. They could have been let go because they are no longer up to it anymore and the hunger will not be the same. To get a ‘good un’ would have to have special circumstances to draw them here - like Coulo who lives here. Looking like a brand new team again to get to know - should be interesting.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.111

RE: RE: Cadman & Valentine by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 13:41:20, 184 views. In reply to 'RE: Cadman & Valentine '

Also I don’t think Tadcaster underperformed massively. If anything it was the highest position they had finished in their history.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.88.139

RE: RE: Cadman & Valentine by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 18:39:02, 191 views. In reply to 'RE: Cadman & Valentine '

“I don’t always think it is necessarily a good thing to get players from the division above."

Very true, it’s certainly no guarantee of higher quality is it.

For example, I went to the National League North play-off final between Chorley and Spennymoor the other day and I can honestly say it was no different to watching a game in our division. In fact there was no player on either side who showed anything like the quality of a Walshaw or a Coulson. We are lucky to have them.

If I was Boro manager watching that game with a view to making some signings then only Chorley’s Meppen-Walter stood out from the crowd of mediocrity on display. The playing surface was superb - like a bowling green - but neither side could maintain possession. Maybe it was big game nerves, but I came away thinking “blimey, these are two of the top teams in this division, we’ve nothing to fear if we go up".

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:f

Re: Why don’t managers rate Cadman? by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 22/5/2019 at 07:14:51, 184 views. In reply to 'Why dont managers rate Cadman ?'

I think that they do rate him but I believe he is just the easiest one to drop. This is because he is the player who is furthest away from the others in terms of his personal playing style. He’s not a blustering, blood and thunder sort of player - his play is much more measured that can be misconstrued as lack of commitment, which, in reality could not be further from the truth.
Also, although managers talk about wanting their teams to play football, getting them to do it is a different thing. ( Numerous times over the season we’ve complained about the up and under football served up.) There’s no point having a technical player on the pitch when the ball is aimlessly punted up long and high and that misses out the midfield anyway.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:1

Re: Re:Why don’t managers rate Cadman? by BoroNo7 User: BoroNo7

Posted: 22/5/2019 at 16:00:19, 164 views. In reply to 'Re: Why don’t managers rate Cadman?'

I agree about Cadman, he was our most creative midfielder , with fast feet, by a long way

But SK and now JD were reluctant to give him a starting role.With a player like him you either build your team round him or don’t play him - both managers appear to have taken the view that they would play safe and pack the mid-field with graft rather than gumption , and a number of folks have commented on how that worked out

JD has made some big decisions and we need to give the new players and manager a fair crack of the whip - only time will tell about how well these decisions will turn out

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.233.113.65

RE: 3 Boro players depart for pastures new by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 14:48:39, 218 views. In reply to '3 Boro players depart for pastures new'

Out of the seven ,would have only kept killock.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 212.92.200.150

Thread: 92437

Boro draw by Southern dog

Posted: 20/5/2019 at 20:00:23, 123 views.

Anyone know the results of the monthly draw from Friday night?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 188.29.165.63

Yes, they will be announced shortly by SAFC Admin

Posted: 20/5/2019 at 20:19:59, 123 views. In reply to 'Boro draw'

It’s the busiest time of the football season at the moment!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.234.29

RE: Yes, they will be announced shortly by Stockton Seadog User: Stockton Seadog

Posted: 21/5/2019 at 16:41:54, 131 views. In reply to 'Yes, they will be announced shortly'

http://www.scarboroughathletic.com/news/2019-05-21/boro-draw-winners-april-2019

Edited on 21/05/19 at 16:42:13
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 83.148.226.159

Thread: 92436

Thank you to Tommy Taylor & Morgs by Farsley Arkan User: Farsley Arkan

Posted: 18/5/2019 at 16:24:13, 321 views.

A genuine thanks to those fellas & the others I may not have seen yet, who have tweeted/posted complaining about the frankly dreadful decimation of our history that is being perpetrated at Throstle Nest In the last 24 hrs.

Dunno if you folks are aware or have noticed, but we have a new chairman - who has completely replaced our badge (NO) AND is trying to change our ground’s name (NOOO!!) AND completely change our kit/colours…NNNOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

I APPRECIATE it will not be top of your list of priorities at SAFC but I just wanted to express that we supporters are grateful for the solidarity shown by former Blue Army players.
BTW it all looks hideous - mint green n black badge & kit(?????) with a kind of ghost helmet badge, that looks to have been cut n pasted by a 10 yr old. Think Minnesota high school grid iron team & you’ll get the idea even before taking a look, if any of you do so.

No one in any seriousness likes it, and it’s the sort of thing that can make a fella turn and walk away from his club… as it won’t really be HIS club anymore, being like this. Imagine waking up tomorrow to a yellow & blue kit + a walrus for a badge…

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 217.39.47.146

Thread: 92434

From TSN (2) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 16/5/2019 at 22:02:30, 321 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/sport/football/new-boy-coates-keen-to-turn-scarborough-athletic-s-base-into-a-fortress-1-9772997

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.249.182

Thread: 92433

From TSN (1) by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 16/5/2019 at 22:02:14, 295 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/sport/football/joe-lumsden-lines-up-his-goals-at-scarborough-athletic-1-9773305

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.249.182

Thread: 92432

Ollie Banks, by Stepney Seadog 1

Posted: 15/5/2019 at 18:23:11, 368 views.

Scored a brilliant goal for Tranmere in the first play off. I am sure he played for Boro. against Bridlington and scored both goals. He was obviously a good player and left the club shortly after. He moved to N. Ferriby then FCUM before joining Chesterfield and is now a regular for Tranmere.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e36:700:29

RE: Ollie Banks by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 15/5/2019 at 23:12:15, 315 views. In reply to 'Ollie Banks,'

He did play for Boro for about half a season or thereabouts. Brought in by Rudy. I had the honour of him, his sister and Mum Dad stay with me at Harmony Country Lodge guesthouse - nice family.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.111

Thread: 92431

Well done to the supporters club by Seamer unreg

Posted: 15/5/2019 at 09:23:16, 242 views.

for the hard work they have done to help with the disability issues in the stands at the ground. Great work. See official site for more info.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.255.147.66

Thread: 92429

2 new signings by Tree unreg

Posted: 14/5/2019 at 20:21:51, 337 views.

Isaac Assenso and T’nique Fishley. Both latterly of Ossett Utd. Both defenders.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

New signings by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 15/5/2019 at 07:07:29, 273 views. In reply to '2 new signings'

New gaffer, new team and the seven signings so far are really promising but obviously some of the last seasons squad will have to go to make room for them. I am interested to see if he wants to keep any of the non-contracted players and I wonder if they know who they are yet?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:1

Even more by Stockton Seadog User: Stockton Seadog

Posted: 15/5/2019 at 07:33:58, 299 views. In reply to 'New signings'

Joe Lumsden and Harry Coates

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 83.148.226.159

RE: Even more by Tree unreg

Posted: 15/5/2019 at 14:08:24, 317 views. In reply to 'Even more'

I believe we’re going to play under a new name next year: Tadcaster/Ossett Select XI

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 152.71.38.58

RE: RE: Even more by Cynic

Posted: 15/5/2019 at 14:24:08, 322 views. In reply to 'RE: Even more'

I suppose geography and demographics means that our recruiting grounds for non-local players will inevitably be mostly along the A64 corridor and Hull.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.41.71.190

Thread: 92428

Bolds by Joe90

Posted: 14/5/2019 at 08:21:45, 233 views.

Gone to Ferriby as Manager, leaving SK without an assistant at Matlock, can see Mezza getting a call as his no. 2 and getting a regular game… only lives in Rotherham… Am not sure it warrants us having to many backroom players/coaches… I’d like to see Steve Roberts given the role as assistant, with our goalkeeping coach staying if tommy stays… as I know they have a great relationship and gets the most out of him..

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:4608:2600:b

RE: Bolds by Stockton Seadog User: Stockton Seadog

Posted: 16/5/2019 at 16:08:33, 194 views. In reply to 'Bolds'

SK says
“Everything was going well until I got the call from Chris (Bolder) saying he’d be taking the North Ferriby job, but that’s water under the bridge now and we move on. I’m spending a lot of time getting around people, seeing people and seeing what I need and don’t need. It’s hectic at this time of year anyway but I’ve never known it as hectic as it is now with players wanting to sort deals quickly in time for next season.

I spoke to two players last night and will be talking to another three later this week, I’ll also be getting round the players we already have to see how the land lies. I’m also hoping to announce my new assistant shortly so it’s all go at the moment.”

Former Scarborough player Adam Sollitt is his goalkeeping coach.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 83.148.226.159

Thread: 92426

Walshaw signs up for next season by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 13/5/2019 at 22:26:29, 250 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/sport/football/scarborough-athletic-fight-off-rival-clubs-to-keep-top-scorer-james-walshaw-1-9766367

Great news. Deacey isn’t hanging around assembling his squad for next season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:a

RE: Walshaw signs up for next season by Terry Hope

Posted: 14/5/2019 at 21:38:44, 211 views. In reply to 'Walshaw signs up for next season'

Welcome back for another season Geoff; that 1% was always worth waiting for!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

Thread: 92425

Bit of useless info, but here goes.. by Thor User: Thor

Posted: 12/5/2019 at 17:17:36, 260 views.

Some of us might remember those heady days when we had Brookes Mileson as our one time saviour at SFC? He took on the reins of Whitby, Gretna & also Berwick Rangers.
As of yesterday, Berwick were relegated from Scottish League Two and now join Gretna in the minnows at the Lowland League!

Thats it, a bit of useless history. If up this way, try a match at Kelty Hearts in Fife. Very similar setup to Boro, good prices, all weather pitch, nice club house & Duncan Ferguson as their manager. Standard of football is similar. We also have The Blue Brazil up here too! Cowdenbeath FC - cheap to get in and plenty of room (100+ fans). On the other hand there is East Fife and Raith Rovers locally - plenty of fights if that is your thing.

Missing you guys at Boro. Good luck next season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:d666:4a00:7

Berwick Rangers by Hobdog User: Hobdog

Posted: 13/5/2019 at 10:10:28, 235 views. In reply to 'Bit of useless info, but here goes..'

Berwick Rangers aren’t quite relegated yet, as they still have the second leg of their play-off to come on Saturday. It would though need an even bigger shock than last week’s Liverpool and Spurs comebacks, since they are 4-0 down to Cove Rangers after the first leg and the recent form of both teams doesn’t suggest any chance of Berwick staying up.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.48.241.36

Kelty Hearts manager…. by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 13/5/2019 at 15:26:49, 216 views. In reply to 'Bit of useless info, but here goes..'

Barry Ferguson, ex Rangers and Clyde rather than Duncan.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.79.222.87

RE: Kelty Hearts manager…. by borotomas User: borotomas

Posted: 13/5/2019 at 17:12:19, 207 views. In reply to 'Kelty Hearts manager….'

Duncan Disorderly is still on the coaching staff at Everton. When they sack managers and coaching staff at Everton they tend to give big Dunc a wide berth.

Sad to hear that about Berwick but enjoyed hearing about Kelty for the first time. Cheers for that

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 5.148.84.178
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.