Newest Message: RE: RE: re Help by Patto_89 on 18/6/2019, 21:08:56 - View Thread

3

Thread: 91976

Aiden Thurston by Fendog

Posted: 11/11/2018 at 09:04:04, 353 views.

Just read on the transfer list we’ve signed him from Pickering.
Who is he, one of the youngsters ?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

RE: Aiden Thurston by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 11/11/2018 at 10:00:25, 322 views. In reply to 'Aiden Thurston'

Yeah he’s one of the 7 youngster we signed from the U19s, and he started at Redcar. Didn’t realise we’d “signed" him from Pickering though

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.145

Yeah by Fendog

Posted: 11/11/2018 at 12:10:24, 364 views. In reply to 'RE: Aiden Thurston'

Yeah just noticed it in this week’s transfers. Thought he may of opted for dual registration.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.200

Cannot dual register as we are in the same league nt by seadogx

Posted: 11/11/2018 at 23:42:26, 649 views. In reply to 'Yeah'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Thread: 91975

Today’s Results by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 17:23:44, 331 views.

Hednesford Town) 1 0 Warrington Town
Marine 1 1 Gainsborough Trinity
Matlock Town 2 1 Bamber Bridge
North Ferriby United 1 4 Nantwich Town

www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.180.229.172

Saturyay n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 23:25:42, 391 views. In reply to 'Today’s Results'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.85

Thread: 91974

Result by Seasick seadog User: Seasick seadog

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 17:02:19, 225 views.

Warrington lose 1-0

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.47

Thread: 91973

Flamingo Land Stadium planning application by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 9/11/2018 at 19:12:30, 590 views.

Oodles of drawings and documents for us to pore over on the planning pages of SBC: https://planning.scarborough.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=PFO991NSIPW00&fbclid=IwAR1ZB4rxn1jPOFu4f4DoJoPc9rvRGCYKwTZ_CRqKWwNc6cG6HHdv1j4fwjk

If you read only one thing, cast your eyes over the “supporting statement" which very clearly lays out the board’s thinking, and the reasons behind moving on from the initial temporary-permanent solutions proposed previously. All eminently sensible, and I applaud the board and whomever else has been involved in getting us to this stage. Well done all.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

Total (new) capacity: 3036. New stand capacity: 1196 n/t by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 9/11/2018 at 19:57:51, 438 views. In reply to 'Flamingo Land Stadium planning application'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.111

Damn impressive… by Dunno

Posted: 9/11/2018 at 20:19:55, 566 views. In reply to 'Flamingo Land Stadium planning application'

awesome work to everyone involved.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

RE: Damn impressive… by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 12:14:33, 407 views. In reply to 'Damn impressive…'

I notice the layout of the new stand has changed from having terracing at the front of the stand with seating immediately behind it (which was the previously proposed format at the video presentation earlier in the year). Not a criticism, just an observation.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.93.23

RE:RE: Damn impressive… by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 13:21:22, 371 views. In reply to 'RE: Damn impressive…'

If you are referring to the original stand plans it was decided that it was prudent to not be so adventurous financially because of the extra planning costs that had emerged. Hence the funding appeal for £28k so as not to affect the playing budget. The new plans make more economic sense and are more practical based on forecasted crowds.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.144.21.31

RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive… by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 18:24:36, 359 views. In reply to 'RE:RE: Damn impressive…'

It looks good but are we still having terracing and a cover behind the goal

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.244

RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive… by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 19:18:58, 311 views. In reply to 'RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive…'

Yes, 4 step terrace at swimming pool end with a capacity of 462.

Also a new uncovered standing terrace (7 steps) with a capacity of 330 to the right of the existing main stand (looking from the pitch).

Both of these are in Stage 2 of the proposals, with the east (donkey field) side works to be done first.

Note that the Stage 2 works do not add significantly to the stadium capacity (around +190), but will be of benefit to fans in terms of cover and/or aiding viewing. Personally I cannot stand watching the game at pitch-level, so you’ll find me at the top of the uncovered 7-step terrace as soon as it is built…!

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.200

RE: RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive… by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 19:42:21, 348 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive…'

Cheers Simon so which is stage 1?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.94.64

Stage 1 by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 20:23:20, 337 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive…'

The stand next to the donkey field I understand.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.144.21.31

RE: Stage 1 by Slightly concerned seadog

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 20:30:58, 324 views. In reply to 'Stage 1'

I think stage 2 will be built if the capacity still needs to get to 3000 if we get to conf north and the existing standing in front of the donkey stand are not counted in capacity calculations. If the standing in front donkey stand is included we will have 3200 capacity without stage 2.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:1263:ab00:8

RE: RE: Stage 1 by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 20:49:09, 316 views. In reply to 'RE: Stage 1'

I don’t think there will be any standing at the front of the donkey field stand, or if there is it will be a lot narrower than the existing space. I would imagine that for access purposes there will be no standing permitted in front of the seated stand at all. Therefore the 420 figure given for the donkey field side capacity cannot be included when working out capacity there when the stand is built. The Stage 2 improvements will be needed to get us over the 3000 capacity needed for Conf North.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.54

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive… by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 20:42:35, 357 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive…'

The east (donkey field) stand is Stage 1. 336 seats in a central block, and 2 blocks of 430 capacity terrace either side, all covered (I think). The existing boundary fence will be going 4.7m further back, and a WC/kiosk block to be built near the car park turnstiles.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.54

Financial implications…. by Che User: Che

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 21:13:01, 333 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive…'

What stood out for me was the following regarding National League North status.

“Our research shows that we have both the financial and personnel resources that would enable us to compete at this level"

We can afford it then.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:866b:3700:1

Timescale by Battersea unreg

Posted: 10/11/2018 at 22:15:09, 413 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive…'

Great to see the vision for the development and huge thanks to all those involved.

Be interesting to see how things progress and the timescales involved, although as it has yet to go through Planning the only certainty is that there are no certainties. In the Supporting Statement to the Planning Application I noticed there is a table with the comment “March 2020 at the earliest?" for upgrade to Category B (National League North) standard which presumably is the current projection.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.237

RE: Timescale by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 11/11/2018 at 10:32:40, 410 views. In reply to 'Timescale'

I think March 2020 is the earliest we would need it to be a category B ground, but IF we went up this year then March 2020 would actually be the latest, because it is the March of the first season at that new level.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.85

RE: RE: Timescale by Battersea (unreg)

Posted: 11/11/2018 at 20:41:51, 341 views. In reply to 'RE: Timescale'

Thanks for that. Yes if I’d read the couple of paragraphs below the table I might have picked up that the deadline is the March after promotion and so on that basis I reckon your analysis is spot on.

I must have missed the bit, possibly several years ago, when the FA became more realistic / less stringent on the date by which grounds needed to be upgraded (where necessary) to enable promotion at National League level.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.253

RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive… by Jackson User: Jackson

Posted: 20/11/2018 at 16:07:36, 278 views. In reply to 'RE:RE: Damn impressive…'

I think the stand would be better with terracing in front. Same length as planned but easier to increase standing capacity without knocking anything down.

J REYNOLDS

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.198

RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 20/11/2018 at 17:28:42, 252 views. In reply to 'RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive…'

From what I can make out Jackson that would not be practical. A single row of standing spectators would obscure the view of at least the 1st and perhaps even the 2nd row of seated in the stand. So the stand & seating would all have to be raised, defeating the object. If it is like the Salford stand, I believe the first row of seating is quite low to avoid the necessity of a higher stand. As long as we can provide the necessary numbers in the ground we don’t need to accommodate another row of standing at the front. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.26.98.124

RE: RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive by Jackson User: Jackson

Posted: 21/11/2018 at 19:47:13, 292 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive'

Thank you, Burniston. I meant build it like the main stand, higher with terracing in front. This is how stands should be; hence " Grandstand View", not pitch- level looking over a barrier. After all, this is what won the award for best new stand.
I suppose it doesn’t matter to most people how you reach 5,000 capacity with 2,000 seats. Maybe that will be achieved with terracing on the main stand side only.

J REYNOLDS

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.158.113.250

RE: RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive by Jackson User: Jackson

Posted: 21/11/2018 at 21:31:39, 208 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE:RE: Damn impressive'

Burniston, just watching Salford now. Sensibly, with supporters in mind, first row of seats not at ground level. Not as good as a “paddock" but a lot better than most stands.I realize the new stand will have to be similar, because of the terracing either side.

J REYNOLDS

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.198

Thread: 91972

Ooooooh, lovely! by Old Git

Posted: 9/11/2018 at 14:53:03, 308 views.

Next round of Impetigo Cup we visit Farsley Celtic
December 4th.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.215

Thread: 91971

Every single Boro league goalscorer (IMAGE) by malton seadog User: malton seadog

Posted: 8/11/2018 at 21:24:41, 325 views.

This has been a labour of love for some time. Happy reminiscing!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

Brilliant work mate… by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 8/11/2018 at 21:57:59, 306 views. In reply to 'Every single Boro league goalscorer (IMAGE)'

I’d forgotten all about Dunning and Webb.
I was also surprised to see that Benno (9) had scored more than Pete Davidson (7). I’d have lost a lot of money on that bet.
Similarly Rob Ellis (7) scored more than Thommo (6)

Only name I can’t remember at all is Danny Moore. Any chance of a reminder please 365?

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:aeee:1c00:9

Danny Moore by seadogx

Posted: 8/11/2018 at 22:07:25, 320 views. In reply to 'Brilliant work mate…'

Played RB with curly hair. By my memory as a replacement for Rob Hoyle following promotion to the NCEL Premier

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.160

RE: Danny Moore by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 8/11/2018 at 22:53:54, 455 views. In reply to 'Danny Moore'

Yes. My two main memories of him were scoring a goal direct from a corner at the gasholder end of Queensgate, and having his aforementioned curly locks shaved off for charity after a game at Parkgate. And he was indeed a replacement for Hoyle, but only as the former left for America rather than him being considered better

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.244

Danny Moore by Seadog93

Posted: 9/11/2018 at 17:53:46, 250 views. In reply to 'RE: Danny Moore'

If memories serves me right ex ferriby right back?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.34

Thread: 91970

Big interview with Dave Merris… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 8/11/2018 at 16:41:26, 313 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/scarborough-athletic-skipper-dave-merris-on-early-season-frustration-goals-banter-and-the-push-for-promotion-1-9435059

Edited by admin on 08/11/18 at 16:47:17
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.62

Thread: 91969

Boro injury blow by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 7/11/2018 at 17:19:08, 309 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/scarborough-athletic-midfielder-dean-ruled-out-1-9433028

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 217.135.43.196

Thread: 91968

REDCAR TOWN v Boro video highlights online now by Old Git

Posted: 7/11/2018 at 16:25:27, 379 views.

at this link.

Very little audio as the wind was bad I’ve reduced it almost to zero
so you will have to turn your speakers up full blast.
There was what looked like a video platform behind and between the dugouts
but in that wind it would have been a hazardous occupation.
I was at ground level and nearly got blown over a number of times in the 2nd half.
That explains the regular camera shake.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFT5fxseDeo

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 51.6.18.232

Many thanks OG. n/t by Seamer unreg

Posted: 7/11/2018 at 19:41:51, 347 views. In reply to 'REDCAR TOWN v Boro video highlights online now'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.155.184.177

Forgot to mention that Redcar by Old Git

Posted: 7/11/2018 at 22:45:57, 438 views. In reply to 'Many thanks OG. n/t'

sell Curly Wurlies in the bar.
That’s a big plus for me
so I hope we play up there next season.
Get there early for the All Day Breakfast.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.215

Thread: 91967

VIDEO INTERVIEWS… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 7/11/2018 at 00:04:40, 310 views.

Steve Roberts
https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-scarborough-athletic-coach-steve-roberts-after-the-win-at-redcar-1-9431494

Aidan Thurston & George Walmsley
https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-scarborough-athletic-s-george-walmsley-aidan-thurston-1-9431497

Edited by admin on 07/11/18 at 00:13:14
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.148

Thread: 91966

From SN: Match Report by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 22:14:58, 285 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/five-star-scarborough-athletic-see-off-redcar-1-9431435

Edited by admin on 06/11/18 at 22:33:39
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:6

RE: From SN: Match Report by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 7/11/2018 at 11:29:03, 289 views. In reply to 'From SN: Match Report'

“Boro came out with renewed vigour and installed more of a bed settee than a cushion between the sides"

I think someone challenged Martin to shoehorn “bed settee" into one of his match reports…

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.114

Haha … by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 7/11/2018 at 12:02:09, 271 views. In reply to 'RE: From SN: Match Report'

Always wanted to use that line.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 217.135.43.196

Thread: 91965

YCRadio commentary by Farsley Arkan User: Farsley Arkan

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 21:10:14, 267 views.

Credit where it’s due - I enjoyed the commentary on the Celts game on satdy, Obviously I enjoyed the result, but I thought the commentator (don’t know if he uses this site or not) was pretty fair and did a good job. I don’t know if he was the regular commentator or if its done on a rota or sumsuch,

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.54

RE: YCRadio commentary by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 22:20:39, 243 views. In reply to 'YCRadio commentary'

It was one of our regular commentators, we have about 5 or 6 who do it as and when they’re available, usually 2 of them at a game, but I think it was just Joe on his own that day

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.148

Thread: 91964

Boro line-up tonight by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 20:26:12, 190 views.

1. Morgan
2. Atkinson
3. Thurston
4. Valentine
5. Burgess (c)
6. Johnson
7. Lofts
8. Dixon
9. Scarborough
10. Cadman
11. Jowett

Subs: Taylor, Scott, Lacey, Brooksby, Walmsley

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.52

Thread: 91963

1-0 to Boro, Lofts penalty by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 20:24:41, 212 views.


-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.23.121.164

1-0 ht n/t by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 20:35:31, 204 views. In reply to '1-0 to Boro, Lofts penalty'


-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.23.121.164

2-0 Jack Johnson n/t by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 20:53:27, 210 views. In reply to '1-0 ht n/t'


-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.23.121.164

3-0 Valentine n/t by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 20:54:33, 214 views. In reply to '2-0 Jack Johnson n/t'


-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.23.121.164

Walmsley on for Scarborough for Scarborough n/t by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 21:02:45, 203 views. In reply to '3-0 Valentine n/t'


-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.23.121.164

4-0 Cadman n/t by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 21:06:52, 194 views. In reply to 'Walmsley on for Scarborough for Scarborough n/t'


-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.23.121.164

5-0 Walmsley nt by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 21:34:32, 262 views. In reply to '4-0 Cadman n/t'


-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.111

Full-Time: 5-0 by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 21:55:57, 219 views. In reply to '5-0 Walmsley nt '

Attendance 172

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.130

RE: Full-Time: 5-0 by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 22:00:08, 214 views. In reply to 'Full-Time: 5-0 '

That’s the sort of crowd it’d have been at Queensgate (if we were lucky!!)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.94.40

EVO Prem Result: Witton 1-3 Stalybridge Celtic by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 22:10:07, 200 views. In reply to 'RE: Full-Time: 5-0 '

That was the only match in the division tonight.

Stalybridge move up 4 places to 7th.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.244

RE: 5-0 Walmsley nt by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 22:17:37, 228 views. In reply to '5-0 Walmsley nt '

Walmsley becomes the first player from our youth system to score a 1st team goal. Well done to the lad.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:6

Thread: 91962

Ian Scobbie by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 5/11/2018 at 20:18:27, 450 views.

Ha ha apologies if this has been mentioned before but I have just seen that Ian Scobbie was appointed to the board of Hartlepool United due to his 30 years knowledge in sports related business
Wonder how long before they go bust then? 🤔

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.137.54

Hope their by Chester Perry

Posted: 5/11/2018 at 21:47:39, 409 views. In reply to 'Ian Scobbie'

ground is not located on valuable land, mind you i can’t stand the monkey hangers

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.45

Without meaning to cause debate…. by Patto_1989

Posted: 5/11/2018 at 23:34:29, 410 views. In reply to 'Ian Scobbie'

…was it not Scobbie who came up with the plans to originally sell the McCain, and then use the money generator for a new ground (similar in size and shape to FLS), and clear the clubs debts?

From my own understanding at the time, it was the council who blocked these plans to sell the ground, effectively killing the club, before waiting a number of years before lifting the covenant and selling on the land for a decent profit.

For all people might believe Scobbie was the ender of SFC, from seeing quite a bit behind the scenes at the time, he was actually a very intelligent man who worked hard to try and save the club.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.144.220.136

RE: Without meaning to cause debate…. by Seamer unreg

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 03:33:34, 354 views. In reply to 'Without meaning to cause debate….'

Wasn’t it GR who first came up with this idea. He wanted to build. new ground out by the tip but the council were having none of it.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.155.184.177

Scobbie’s plan … by Cynic Al

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 07:09:18, 384 views. In reply to 'Without meaning to cause debate….'

Was to build a ground on the industrial estate between Morrisons and Seamer Tip.

From my memory, some of the major obstacles at the time was that the plan was very last minute. No plans had been drawn up, no planning applications submitted, nothing was actually on the table. It was a ‘pie in the sky’ plan. The council didn’t really have a plan to block. The other major problem with the plan was that the ‘plan’ was not envisaged to be able to clear the debts that SFC still had.

The plan to sell the McCain Stadium site was first mooted by Geoffrey Richmond. He wanted to build a new stadium on what is now the Sainsbury’s site.

In my opinion, Ian Scobbie was not the reason the club went under, he just didn’t have the time/finances to save it.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.77

To add.. by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 08:49:24, 280 views. In reply to 'Scobbie’s plan …'

The proposed stadium would have been the same specification as FLS (minus the sports village) - so 2,000 capacity and at Eastfield. Funds from the sale of the Athletic Ground would have repaid debts but not left enough for the build, and other funding wasn’t guaranteed. The council were asked to lift the covenant on a promise with no plans etc.

The financial collapse also came a few months after we went bust, which would certainly have hampered any ability to sell the land for anywhere near enough money.

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

RE: Scobbie’s plan … by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 08:59:25, 271 views. In reply to 'Scobbie’s plan …'

Now that would have been a brilliant site. Even closer to home than the current one ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

RE: Scobbie’s plan … by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 19:16:38, 254 views. In reply to 'Scobbie’s plan …'

In my view it was little more than a last minute smokescreen. To little, too late. I agree that Scobbie wasn’t the reason the club went under, it was already holed under the waterline. That said, it would have been tough, but in the right hands, say a supporters’ trust, I still believe it could have been rescued.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: Without meaning to cause debate…. by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 09:18:16, 329 views. In reply to 'Without meaning to cause debate….'

The club would have gone bust regardless.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.71

Well that was disappointing…… by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 12:58:29, 398 views. In reply to 'RE: Without meaning to cause debate….'

Best part of twelve years waiting for “the truth" to come out and that’s all there was.

So all those long running disparaging comments from Town fans were just unsubstantiated innuendo after all.

No wonder Malton decided not to make the film.

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.47

RE: Well that was disappointing…… by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 19:17:42, 314 views. In reply to 'Well that was disappointing……'

I’d forgotten about that. Boy we’ve come a long way.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: Well that was disappointing…… by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 7/11/2018 at 11:23:57, 260 views. In reply to 'Well that was disappointing……'

Just to add…

…the council’s primary duty was to ensure that the covenant on the Seamer Road site maintaining it as a sporting venue for the use of the town was either maintained, or “transferred" to another facility.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.114

RE: Ian Scobbie by Seamer unreg

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 09:26:47, 418 views. In reply to 'Ian Scobbie'

From Steve Adamsons “The Official History “. The big news of 1989 was the announcement by Geoffrey Richmond that the club was looking to sell the ground and move to a new site, possibly at Caytom Low Road, where a modern, purpose built stadium would be erected. A Hull based development company had agreed to pay £2.56 million for the McCain Stadium, for a supermarket site, and would build the club a new ground of planning permission was forthcoming.
There was much talk of a proposed sale of the McCain Stadium for a supermarket site,with Chairman Geoffrey Richmond now hoping to re-locate to Dunslow Road, close to the Eastfield Industrial Estate.
And the rest is history.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.52

wasnt it by Farsley Arkan User: Farsley Arkan

Posted: 6/11/2018 at 21:25:24, 325 views. In reply to 'RE: Ian Scobbie'

going to be an athletics stadium -type thing? a pitch within a running track with a big-ish main stand? Out by McCains/Cayton?

Or was that a different plan?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.54

RE: wasnt it by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 8/11/2018 at 11:14:55, 349 views. In reply to 'wasnt it'

Let’s hope any plans for Hartlepool are drawn up on more than the back of a fag packet then

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.172

Thread: 91961

£7,170 raised of £28,000 target by Old Git

Posted: 5/11/2018 at 20:07:39, 211 views.

Well done Seadogs
Only three quarters to go and plenty of time,
‘So big or small we want it all’
as the dear wife used to say.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.166

Thread: 91960

Team news ahead of Redcar… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 5/11/2018 at 12:38:23, 368 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/kittrick-keen-to-give-scarborough-athletic-youth-a-chance-at-redcar-1-9428797

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.5.136.96

RE: Team news ahead of Redcar… by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 5/11/2018 at 18:59:32, 296 views. In reply to 'Team news ahead of Redcar…'

Do you know if Denny and/or Ryan will be in attendance as well, given the large number of U19 players likely to get a run out?

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

Thread: 91959

Pen? by Cynic

Posted: 5/11/2018 at 12:28:25, 205 views.

Having watched the video that pen decision is shocking - is there no common sense? I know we might have sometimes had the rub of the green re pens this season but at least there was something to be debated.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.130

Thread: 91958

Just thought I’d copy this to here by Old Git

Posted: 4/11/2018 at 21:31:55, 253 views.

To mark the 4-week countdown of our crowdfunding campaign tomorrow, we are encouraging everyone who follows the club to give £5 on the 5th.

In addition to the initial donation given to the club of £2,000, the club has received a £1,000 donation. Combined with the current JustGiving total, this means we are just a few hundred pounds short of reaching £10,000 and a third of our overall target!

If we can receive 200 £5 donations then that will add a minimum of £1,000 to the pot and take us well over the £10k. We really appreciate everyones contribution to the campaign so far and hope that you will all support this push tomorrow. Thank you.

Up the Boro!

www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/newstand

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 146.66.45.113

Thread: 91957

Promotion my axxe by Geoff hooley

Posted: 4/11/2018 at 19:57:15, 391 views.

After lasts 4 games where do you think the teams going to finish in the league. Because to me kitty asnt a clue.to blame 2 players for one of farsleys goals and say it’s down to keeper an
d unnamed player is laughable.. A few more results like this and it will be bye bye.please dont defend him by saying it’s down to injuries,the worse the team performs the more injuries will appear.time to face reality we have had A great season up to now .But it’s downhill now.
K

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.77

Really? by Joe90

Posted: 4/11/2018 at 20:19:59, 269 views. In reply to 'Promotion my axxe'

2pts a game , new league? I think your underestimating the league we in.. for sure I think we can improve the squad but then players their possibly on more money, closer to home and getting a game week in week out. I see the recent signings as possibly not the greatest and think there was better players around that made us stronger in the first 11 not the bench. But let’s judge the guy in results so far his done great and I see no reason to complain.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:4608:2600:f

Geoff is definitely a Hyde or Whitby fan winding us up. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 4/11/2018 at 20:35:47, 330 views. In reply to 'Promotion my axxe'

Nobody, but NOBODY, can be this delusional.

“Because to me kitty asnt a clue"

132 points from the 60 league games played since the opening day of last season at our new ground. 2.2 points per game. 141 scored, 61 conceded. +79 goal difference. 2nd last season in a lower league, currently five points clear in a higher league.

There are no words to describe your opinion that are polite enough to post on a public messageboard. You’re entitled to your opinion, but it’s misplaced to the extreme.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

RE: Geoff is definitely a Hyde or Whitby fan winding us up. by Geoff hooley

Posted: 4/11/2018 at 23:08:07, 316 views. In reply to 'Geoff is definitely a Hyde or Whitby fan winding us up.'

Do you honestly think he’s improved the team from last season ?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.34

RERE: Geoff is definitely a Hyde or Whitby fan winding us up by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 4/11/2018 at 23:34:38, 379 views. In reply to 'RE: Geoff is definitely a Hyde or Whitby fan winding us up.'

Apart from the loss of Max & Tom White - Yes, we are stronger

Don’t forget to factor in around 6 or 7 on the injured list recently. Have patience, SK is doing what he can when he can.

All teams are going to have poor results from time to time. Farsley are a top side and would you be happier if we were higher up the league……………? ;)

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.154.189

Could be worse by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 4/11/2018 at 22:44:39, 269 views. In reply to 'Promotion my axxe'

We could be FORTY ONE places further down the pyramid like were the last time I visited Throstle Nest.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.251.229

Re league finish by Old man

Posted: 7/11/2018 at 11:54:25, 205 views. In reply to 'Promotion my axxe'

I think boro with steve at the helm will finish top 3 geoff its 3 lost from 18 games not the other way round. Just have to wait and see the young guns will come through in future seasons. Bah humbag hooley

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a01:4c8:c2b:c7b7:1:
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.