Newest Message: RE: RE: RE: From yesterday’s Scarborough News by Dan on 23/3/2019, 00:05:26 - View Thread

18

Thread: 92172

From Whitby Gazette. by Seamer unreg

Posted: 8/2/2019 at 10:57:40, 251 views.

Open letter by Whitby Town chairmen Eddie McNamee.
Go to Whitby Gazette and sport to read.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.170.253.20

Thread: 92171

NRSC Semi-Final Tue 5th March by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 7/2/2019 at 15:19:52, 151 views.

League website has the NRSC semi-final against York down for Tue 5th March.

Has anybody seen a rescheduled date for Marine away yet?

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.132

Thread: 92170

NRSC semi-final, 26th Feburary 2008, Boro v York by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 20:07:12, 227 views.

This was the line-up from our last meeting with York, all of ELEVEN years ago, at the same stage of the competition

Bramley, Davies, Milner, Kemp, Widdowson, Thompson, Griffin, Phillips, Blott, Medcalf, Morton

Subs - Hogg, Hepples, Hyam.

Crowd 505.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

RE: NRSC semi-final, 26th Feburary 2008, Boro v York by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 7/2/2019 at 16:52:04, 207 views. In reply to 'NRSC semi-final, 26th Feburary 2008, Boro v York'

someone send this to the whatsapp group.

they way they are going on its like the Rome derby

( a real one because its in the same city)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

RE: RE: NRSC semi-final, 26th Feburary 2008, Boro v York by Terry Hope

Posted: 7/2/2019 at 23:43:58, 209 views. In reply to 'RE: NRSC semi-final, 26th Feburary 2008, Boro v York'

So what’s your point? York is within the Borough of Scarborough isn’t it?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.107

RE: RE: RE: NRSC semi-final, 26th Feburary 2008, Boro v York by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 8/2/2019 at 13:01:22, 139 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: NRSC semi-final, 26th Feburary 2008, Boro v York'

For me York is like the rivalry with Barnet, from league competition, the old club and it’s miles away. Takes an hour to get to York.

Whitby / Brid can understand it’s down the road.

The same city comment is what i think a derby actually is, we have just have rivals.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

RE: RE: RE: RE: NRSC semi-final, 26th Feburary 2008, Boro v York by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 8/2/2019 at 13:13:49, 270 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: NRSC semi-final, 26th Feburary 2008, Boro v York'

I think derbies are all relative, to what league you’re in. For example, in the conference at times Halifax was our “local derby" but in the NCEL for example there were so many Yorkshire derbies you didn’t know where to start, most of which were closer than Halifax!!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Thread: 92169

NRSC SF draw live on BBC Radio Tees tonight from 6.30pm NT by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 17:50:28, 119 views.


www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.123

Sboro v York in NRSC by Seadog93

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 18:44:09, 170 views. In reply to 'NRSC SF draw live on BBC Radio Tees tonight from 6.30pm NT '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.183

full draw by Seadog Update User: Seadog Update

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 18:53:01, 198 views. In reply to 'Sboro v York in NRSC'

Middlesbrough v Marske Utd

SCARBOROUGH ATHLETIC v York City

To be played on or before 31 March.

www.twitter.com/seadogupdate

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.107

obviously before… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 19:31:10, 168 views. In reply to 'full draw'

It’s hardly going to be on!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Thread: 92168

Tommy Taylor interesting Coventry & Doncaster by Old Git

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 15:28:50, 156 views.

Coventry City linked with goalkeeper interest - reports
The Sky Blues are in the market for a new goalkeeper next summer

Coventry City are among a number of clubs monitoring non-league goalkeeper Tommy Taylor, according to reports.
The Sky Blues are facing the prospect of losing first choice stopper Lee Burge in the summer with the 26-year-old out of contract and showing no signs of engaging in talks with the club about a new deal.
Third choice Corey Addai is currently providing back-up but yet to make his first team debut for City and therefore untried at League One level.

A goalkeeper is a clear priority for the summer, and according to HITC Sport’s sources close to Scarborough Athletic, Taylor is being watched by the Sky Blues and League One rivals Doncaster Rovers. The 26-year-old late developer has impressed for the Evo-Stik Premier Division side since joining the club in the summer of 2017.

A former Sheffield Wednesday trainee, Taylor helped Athletic win promotion from the Evo-Stik First Division North in his debut season when they finished second in the table. Taylor’s fine form saw him win a number of awards at the club’s Player of the Year awards at the end of the 2017/18 campaign. He has continued his impressive form into this season, helping Athletic into fifth place in the Evo-Stik Premier Division.

Taylor’s outstanding performances have brought him to the attention of clubs higher up the football pyramid, with scouts from Coventry and Doncaster reported to be making regular checks on the athletic ‘keeper.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: Tommy Taylor interesting Coventry & Doncaster by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 7/2/2019 at 16:02:43, 122 views. In reply to 'Tommy Taylor interesting Coventry & Doncaster'

Is HITC Sport a widely known and reputable source of football news? Or a convenient place online for a cunning agent to start tongues wagging and thereby increase the value of - and opportunities for - a player he/she represents?

Once a bitter cynic, always a bitter cynic.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.180

maybe by Old Git

Posted: 7/2/2019 at 16:33:39, 130 views. In reply to 'RE: Tommy Taylor interesting Coventry & Doncaster'

I got all of this from the Coventry site cos a mate is a Coventry fan who told me about it.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: maybe by Old Git

Posted: 7/2/2019 at 16:43:07, 110 views. In reply to 'maybe'

In Tommy’s case I believe Steve Ogrizovic has been keeping tabs on hin
and has watched him several times.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Thread: 92167

Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 11:30:33, 194 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/wrexham-appoint-former-scarborough-athletic-boss-bryan-hughes-as-manager-1-9578382

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.156

RE: Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 13:35:46, 151 views. In reply to 'Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager'

how long till we play them then?

inept manager

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

RE: Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager by Leeds seadog19 User: Leeds seadog19

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 13:54:00, 173 views. In reply to 'Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager'

Is it just me or is the decision to appoint BH or anyone else for that matter on a 3 and half year deal for a manager at a non-league club absolute madness?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.78

RE: RE: Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 14:30:05, 169 views. In reply to 'RE: Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager'

It seems a surprising appointment, not just in the length of the contract. No disrespect to BH but you would have thought Wrexham would have gone for a proven manager with at least some track record of success.

Anyway, good luck to him, i hope he does well.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.174

RE: RE: RE: Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager by Dan

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 18:02:20, 165 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager'

If l was a Wrexham fan I’d be absolutely baffled by this appointment, given his only experience is being sacked from a club 3 tiers below after a season of overwhelming failure, and hasn’t been involved in the professional game since.

Russ Slade to Man United in the summer btw, you heard it here first.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.237.103

RE: RE: RE: RE: Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 6/2/2019 at 21:05:42, 252 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Bryan Hughes appointed as new Wrexham Manager'

I was reading their fans forum earlier and most seem to be extremely angry at the length of the contract. It would seem Bryan has one or two very good contacts on their board.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.132

Thread: 92166

Some good news for Boro… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 5/2/2019 at 16:02:41, 341 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/will-annan-return-is-one-of-many-boosts-for-scarborough-athletic-1-9577342

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.123

Thread: 92165

U19s win 4-2 by Old Git

Posted: 4/2/2019 at 22:55:08, 150 views.

In an entertaining game of attacking football.
When Huddersfield YMCA took the lead with an excellent
goal after 4 mins no one would have guessed that
Boro’s U19 would be leading 4-1 at half time.
YMCA’s goal was a flowing move of passing across the park
with the ball finally being superbly vollyed home from a cross into
the box from the right. look like a hard night ahead for the Boro lads.
However from the kick-off a flowing move from the Boro saw the ball
flick off the outside of the right hand post at the swimming pool end when
Flynn McNaughton missed the chance to get an immediate equaliser.
It didn’t take Flynn long to make amends for his miss as after 12 minutes
he flicked home a lovely through ball into the box down the middle to beat
the visitor’s keeper and make it 1-1.
It looked as though this game was gonna bring us lots of goals.
On 27 minutes Robbie Scarborough, with his back to goal,
controlled the ball, just inside the area them turned
and put the ball wide of defenders and keeper into the botton left hand
corner of the net, 2-1 Boro.
It really was end to end but Huddersfield just couldn’t get a telling shot on target
and then in quick sucession flynn McNaughton scored two more to complete
a first half hat trick. His second came as the ball was played into the box
defenders and forwards vied for the balland it came to Flynn who slid it into the net.
his third was thumped home across the keeper from the right hand side of the box
to make it 4-1 and that was the end of the scoring in the first half.
How many is it going to be must have been the thoughts of the crowd in the stand.
But even though the 2nd half was end to end and Huddersfild scored a well-worked 2nd
after 10 mins of the 2nd 45 there was to be no further goals.
On what turned into a freezing cold night it was a great game
to watch for both the local & visiting fans.
After the final whistle I noticed two of our players limping off into the dressing room.
I hope that they weren’t serious injuries and they’ll be out there next Monday night
for the top of the table clash with Pontefract Collieries.
See you there for what looks like being a cracking match.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Nice report, cheers. Nt by Dunno

Posted: 5/2/2019 at 04:25:05, 131 views. In reply to 'U19s win 4-2'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.133

RE: Nice report, cheers. Nt by seadog2019

Posted: 5/2/2019 at 09:38:49, 154 views. In reply to 'Nice report, cheers. Nt'

i dont miss many but looks like i missed a good un, bloody work, thanks for the report

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.78

Thread: 92164

Rudy by China seadog

Posted: 3/2/2019 at 10:12:59, 209 views.

Is Rudy on his way back???

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.68.47.80

RE: Rudy by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 3/2/2019 at 12:56:04, 205 views. In reply to 'Rudy'

I realise he has left AFC Mansfield by “mutual consent" but even so it’s a pretty big leap to link that with a return to the mighty Boro

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

both AFC & Pikes have struggled by Old Git

Posted: 3/2/2019 at 13:53:03, 356 views. In reply to 'RE: Rudy'

this season and AFC were lucky to get promoted last season
through the Shaw Lane fiasco, they were about the last side
to be moved up a division.
Last season AFC looked to be certain champions until suffering a collapse
of form in final third of season, seems that form continued this season.
Both them and Pikes started this season with weak squads
and needed to adjust to the level with the main aim being not geting relelgated.
What is it with promoted clubs thinking they have a divine right
to another immediate promotion.
Luckily Boro fans are much more grounded in reality.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Thread: 92163

Today’s results by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 17:19:47, 154 views.

Gainsborough 1-4 Warrington
Grantham 0-2 Workington
Stafford 1-1 Lancaster

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Thread: 92161

Warrington 1 up at Gainsborough by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 15:22:09, 76 views.

Anything other than a defeat for Gainsborough will see us slip out of the play-off zone.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Gainsborough 0-2 Warrington n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 15:23:11, 81 views. In reply to 'Warrington 1 up at Gainsborough'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

HT, still 2-0 n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 15:48:33, 87 views. In reply to 'Gainsborough 0-2 Warrington n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Gainsborough 0-3 Warrington n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 16:09:15, 81 views. In reply to 'HT, still 2-0 n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Gainsborough 0-4 Warrington n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 16:28:00, 83 views. In reply to 'Gainsborough 0-3 Warrington n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Gainsborough 1-4 Warrington n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 16:45:02, 84 views. In reply to 'Gainsborough 0-4 Warrington n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Final score 1-4 by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 16:58:13, 86 views. In reply to 'Gainsborough 1-4 Warrington n/t'

Boro stay 5th, Warrington go top

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Thread: 92160

MATCH OFF n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 09:17:37, 102 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Thread: 92159

Pitch inspection at 9 a.m. tomorrow n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/2/2019 at 15:54:37, 144 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Whitby game is off,frozen pitch. n/t. by Seamer unreg

Posted: 1/2/2019 at 16:51:49, 180 views. In reply to 'Pitch inspection at 9 a.m. tomorrow n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.156.137.83

Game by F

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 09:18:02, 155 views. In reply to 'Pitch inspection at 9 a.m. tomorrow n/t'

Game off

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.91.133

good news by deep seadog User: deep seadog

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 09:32:41, 192 views. In reply to 'Game'

Gives all our injured defenders another week to get fit although Baily will now miss another week

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.130.117.227

Thread: 92158

New striker to help by Dunkin apples

Posted: 29/1/2019 at 20:54:24, 278 views.

Lee Shaw is the solution to our woes to freshen up the strikeforce . He guided Grantham to the playoffs and is not getting enough games for Chesterfield . He is our 2019 Walshaw! I believe he is obtainable within our budgets! What does any one think ?!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.33.235

Sea shaw by Dunno

Posted: 29/1/2019 at 23:18:30, 259 views. In reply to 'New striker to help'

I’d prefer Jason white back myself. He was f*********g dynamite.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.160

RE: Sea shaw by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 30/1/2019 at 09:03:50, 210 views. In reply to 'Sea shaw'

and he can play in goal as and when needed

I’ll get my coat

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Thread: 92157

Lampard on Derby’s game at Accrington by Cynic

Posted: 28/1/2019 at 09:55:21, 223 views.

We had 2,500 fans here and I thought it was great, it felt like a proper game,” the Derby manager said. “I’ve played in Cup ties like that for Chelsea, we won 1-0 at Scarborough a few years back and by no means were we the much better team.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.126

Thread: 92156

quiz just for fun… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 27/1/2019 at 15:47:07, 185 views.

Without looking at old programmes or internet sites, see how many of the ELEVEN specialist goalkeepers you can remember who we used in the 2015/16 season. I managed eight

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

I’ve got all 11.. by Battersea (unreg)

Posted: 27/1/2019 at 18:52:24, 208 views. In reply to 'quiz just for fun…'

Though I would have to admit to a couple of minutes ‘research’ (otherwise known as cheating).

I remembered 3 off the top of my head.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Thread: 92155

Free kick at yesterday’ s game. by Seamer unreg.

Posted: 27/1/2019 at 09:53:49, 403 views.

Taylor was trying to organise his wall when the big number 4 went and stood in front of him trying to stop Taylor setting his wall. Never seen this before at any game. This confused the ref even more and said nothing. Is this legal,poor sportsmanship or have they come up with something new?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.155.185.103

RE: Free kick at yesterday’ s game. by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 27/1/2019 at 10:40:48, 184 views. In reply to 'Free kick at yesterday’ s game. '

Agreed that pissed me off too and I don’t think Tommy was too impressed either.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Free kick by Riponseadog

Posted: 27/1/2019 at 10:41:06, 344 views. In reply to 'Free kick at yesterday’ s game. '

I too sen lots of football but not seen a guy stand in front of keeper. Proably call it unsportsmanship, and a wadte of time because as he jogged back tommy could have moved the wall, very strange tactic

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Free kick by Riponseadog

Posted: 27/1/2019 at 10:48:14, 206 views. In reply to 'Free kick'

Sorry bout shite spelling was outside walking dog and hands numb.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

RE: Free kick at yesterday’ s game. by original seadogx

Posted: 28/1/2019 at 09:46:51, 142 views. In reply to 'Free kick at yesterday’ s game. '

It comes under the heading “unsporting behaviour" and punishable with a yellow card.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.198

RE: Free kick at yesterday’ s game. by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 29/1/2019 at 11:46:09, 289 views. In reply to 'Free kick at yesterday’ s game. '

its bad sportsmanship but if its not written down its not a rule so we dont have to follow it. Personally don’t know why more people don’t have a pop from drop balls or when we “throw it back" actually try and create something from it.

winning is winning.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

it is written down by original seadogx

Posted: 29/1/2019 at 13:47:59, 149 views. In reply to 'RE: Free kick at yesterday’ s game. '

Unsporting conduct equals yellow card, it is there in black and white in the laws of the game.

Of course, some teams push the boundaries as far as they can and take advantage of weak refs. I’d prefer to win fairly.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.186

RE: it is written down by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 29/1/2019 at 16:24:06, 288 views. In reply to 'it is written down'

I cant decided if its blinkered viewing but I honestly don’t know why we have not really had teams that do that.

We all surely know that Wally dives a lot but we’re happy because we get free kicks right?

I’m saying we should be the team that pushes the boundaries.

That’s what winners do.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE:RE: it is written down by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 30/1/2019 at 22:31:46, 171 views. In reply to 'RE: it is written down'

I don’t simply see it as winning is winning. Apart from that incident not having a bearing on the outcome of the game, I would be embarrassed to see any of our players do it as blatantly as that. Sure stand in the line of the goalie to hamper his view especially when the kick was about to be taken but what I interpret happened was he stood in a player’s (Tommy) face and space while the ball was not in play probably trying to make Tommy push him away. He would then fall on the floor holding his face & try to get Tommy sent off. Nothing less than bad sportsmanship - yellow card. This exact thing happened with Johnson. Their attacker jumped up and into Jack’s face, he pushed him away from ‘his space’ and promptly got a yellow. The Farsley guy who instigated it never even received a word from the ref.

The issue about Wally is that he obviously has a reputation with refs of going down easily and so they will always tend to give the benefit of the doubt to ‘the defender’. I haven’t seen the playbacks yet but on the face of it Wally should have won at least 1 penalty if not 2. Thought the ref against Farsley was very one sided and crap although I am not blaming him for the defeat - he just didn’t help. I don’t mind refs being harsh but they have to be consistent to both sides which he wasn’t & I have to say he spoiled the game for me.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.26.98.44

Thread: 92154

What on earth is going on?? by Derek Abbey’s barnet

Posted: 27/1/2019 at 02:13:27, 305 views.

Shambles - why have we let McGuire leave but kept Valentine? He looks like he’s never been introduced to a football, awful.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 51.7.188.254

RE: What on earth is going on?? by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 27/1/2019 at 09:17:03, 239 views. In reply to 'What on earth is going on??'

First of all we didn’t “let him leave", his loan period ended. Secondly Valentine is normally one of our best players.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

RE: RE: What on earth is going on?? by vernon

Posted: 27/1/2019 at 09:30:52, 207 views. In reply to 'RE: What on earth is going on??'

maguire was kack, had no quality on the ball, maybe a battler but certainly no better than the other handful of average midfielders sk has brought in.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.88.160

Thread: 92153

quick summary by cynic

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 17:56:02, 303 views.

Difficult today given how many players missing. Farsley were efficient but little more and we could have got something out of game if not conceding at bad times ( I know every time is a bad time, but you get my drift) - South Shields looked a much better team (and with better fans, I suppose the twattish Farsley fans being arseholes are not regular attenders, certainly the ones I chatted to were sound enough). Why, given our inexperienced defence, that Merris was not included for his organisational nous is beyond my understanding.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.180

RE: quick summary by Seadogs93

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 18:13:31, 286 views. In reply to 'quick summary'

Thought they (Farsley) edged it throughout the game, obviously our defence was a makeshift back 4 and you could see this when Farsley started to move in to empty spaces when attacking.
Is it me or are we too honest to the referee, many a teams play acting to get freekicks or surrounding the referee when there player is fouled. (bamber, Farsley Warrington come to my mind).
I thought today we looked more of a threat when the ball was going into the box from wide areas

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2.26.138.154

As a point by Cynic

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 18:56:42, 270 views. In reply to 'RE: quick summary'

Our disallowed goal (from my view) looked fair enough - what about their 3rd goal? From 90 yrds away possible off -side? Anybody with a decent view?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.186

RE: As a point by geoff hooley

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 19:45:50, 266 views. In reply to 'As a point'

dus it matter , we were crap . not going to name names ,but two of them got booked . kt ought to dissolve is business partner ship and get shut of one of them ,he,s out of is depth ,and at times is lost .another player seems to think that hitting cross field balls 30 yards makes him look good ,I bet our forwards don’t. god it makes me want gooder back and you no how bad I think he is.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.191

RE: RE: As a point by Cynic

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 20:14:41, 240 views. In reply to 'RE: As a point'

Even if you were right in every point Geoff, it does matter, it’s how football matches are often decided.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.126

RE: RE: As a point by Terry Hope

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 20:55:36, 250 views. In reply to 'RE: As a point'

For my own personal perspective on your weekly ‘observations’ Geoff, can I ask how old you are? A 5 year bracket is good enough.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

RE: RE: RE: As a point by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 21:09:45, 237 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: As a point'

Old enough to kick your arse

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.15

RE: RE: RE: RE: As a point by Terry Hope

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 21:48:45, 233 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: As a point'

Is that old enough to differentiate between a poor performance and an honest, nothing to be ashamed about defeat?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

RE: As a point by Neutral

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 21:14:11, 274 views. In reply to 'As a point'

Yes, perfectly good goal, just p–s poor defending, as was most of the Scarborough effort on the day.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.68.46.229

Geoff Hooley by christopher56 User: christopher56

Posted: 28/1/2019 at 18:56:47, 187 views. In reply to 'RE: As a point'

Geoff Hooley we don’t need you
Two things
One learn to spell
Two find another football team to ‘support’
You are the most negative person I’ve read
You bring everyone down

South Elmsall seadog

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.50.139.160

RE: Geoff Hooley by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 28/1/2019 at 20:24:37, 178 views. In reply to 'Geoff Hooley '

Aw diddums ,who gives a sh## ,your another loser ,who thinks it’s ok for certain so called players to get away with murder. I say what I think ,nobody forced you to read my posts ,go to mummy and such an orange .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.101

RE: RE: Geoff Hooley by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 28/1/2019 at 21:15:11, 219 views. In reply to 'RE: Geoff Hooley '

That’s going to be my new favourite insult: “you’re such an orange!”

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 29/1/2019 at 09:04:30, 162 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Geoff Hooley '

Hell will freeze over before Geoff posts anything positive on here.

He’s so negative that “glass half empty” doesn’t do him justice. He’s more “everything tastes like p*$$”.

Anyone who disagrees with that is such an orange.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.174

RE: RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley by Orange Tree

Posted: 29/1/2019 at 13:02:16, 148 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley '

On the upside, if the most we have to worry about is some terminal misery, then things aren’t going too badly. It isn’t so very long ago that we spent much of our time worrying about which shady character was going to be the next to come and run the old club into the ground.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

RE: RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley by geoff hooley

Posted: 30/1/2019 at 08:49:20, 136 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley '

we will see at the end of the season who was negative and who was a dreamer , two of the top strikers in the league, but we leak goals for fun , poor tommy must be getting a bad back.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.151.166.19

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 30/1/2019 at 09:02:03, 127 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley '

Funny because we’d kept 2 clean sheets in a row in the league before Saturday

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 30/1/2019 at 12:55:35, 149 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley '

Sorry I missed them ,it must have been all the (red type) results .😀

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.36

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley by Orange Tree

Posted: 30/1/2019 at 10:17:43, 159 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley '

4th best goal scoring record, 7th best defensive record. Not terrible by any stretch.

Who’s dreaming? Just being realistic.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Geoff Hooley by christopher56 User: christopher56

Posted: 30/1/2019 at 19:29:19, 137 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley '

We should make a collective effort not to reply or make any comment made by him
He obviously craves attention
He mustn’t have had much as a child poor thing
The only thing you can do with needy people like him is ignore him
Up the Boro

South Elmsall seadog

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 31.50.139.160

geoff by leicesterlad

Posted: 30/1/2019 at 19:51:32, 157 views. In reply to 'Geoff Hooley '

If Geoff turns out on a Saturday afternoon and pays his money to watch his chosen team he has every right to Express an opinion. What has his childhood got to do with this? Why is he needy? Why would he be seeking attention? And your remark in a previous post about his spelling was unnecessary and rude. Just for the record I do not know Geoff. Always up the boro.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

RE: geoff by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 30/1/2019 at 21:28:12, 137 views. In reply to 'geoff'

Cheers for that, some on this forum would be ok as MP,s and there to##ers as well😇

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.147

RE: RE: geoff by Orange Tree

Posted: 31/1/2019 at 14:01:56, 227 views. In reply to 'RE: geoff'

You are certainly entitled to your opinion Geoff, as are others to question it. I can never understand why anyone purporting to be a supporter of the club would actively choose to be so relentlessly, vehemently and, in my view, disproportionately negative. It doesn’t help and can only do harm. If you are comfortable with that, then fine, but you have to accept it will be viewed negatively by the majority.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

RE: RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 2/2/2019 at 19:21:32, 150 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Geoff Hooley '

Great outcome today how positives that😀

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.37.247.237

Thread: 92152

Latest: Boro 0-1 FARSLEY (Spencer) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 15:12:17, 121 views.


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.168

Latest: Boro 0-2 FARSLEY (Spencer) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 15:50:54, 113 views. In reply to 'Latest: Boro 0-1 FARSLEY (Spencer)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.174

Att 1186 n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 16:10:19, 104 views. In reply to 'Latest: Boro 0-2 FARSLEY (Spencer) '


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.132

Latest: Boro 0-3 FARSLEY (Syers) by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 16:29:54, 90 views. In reply to 'Att 1186 n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.132

Latest: BORO (Coulson) 1-3 Farsley by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 16:36:18, 103 views. In reply to 'Latest: Boro 0-3 FARSLEY (Syers)'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.174

FT: Boro 1-3 Farsley by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 17:03:13, 109 views. In reply to 'Latest: BORO (Coulson) 1-3 Farsley'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.174

RE: FT: Boro 1-3 Farsley by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 17:30:12, 141 views. In reply to 'FT: Boro 1-3 Farsley'

We definitely missed key players today. Watson out for a lengthy period isn’t a help, but to be without all three of Killock, Burgess and Gooda is unfortunate in the extreme. Need them back as soon as possible. Gainsborough were held, so we hold onto 5th for the time being, that’s the saving grace.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

RE: RE: FT: Boro 1-3 Farsley by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 26/1/2019 at 18:13:01, 110 views. In reply to 'RE: FT: Boro 1-3 Farsley'

When i saw first our teamsheet today i thought it was going to be a difficult afternoon. Did we not even have a full bench?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 197.234.242.168
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.