Newest Message: RE: RE: re Help by Patto_89 on 18/6/2019, 21:08:56 - View Thread

3

Thread: 92311

Steve Roberts on the new manager… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 3/4/2019 at 16:21:57, 198 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/steve-roberts-focused-on-the-future-after-john-deacey-s-appointment-at-scarborough-athletic-1-9688857

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 217.135.43.196

Thread: 92310

James Walshaw on new manager & next season…. by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 3/4/2019 at 16:20:12, 226 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/james-walshaw-relishing-chance-to-re-form-link-with-new-scarborough-athletic-boss-john-deacey-1-9689285

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 217.135.43.196

Thread: 92308

Yorkshire coast radio interivew with the new gaffer by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 23:32:40, 136 views.

https://www.yorkshirecoastradio.com/news/local-news/2842507/scarborough-athletic-new-manager-announced/

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.253.165

Thread: 92307

New blood by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 17:54:58, 367 views.

Can’t see why with season nearly over, we get a new manager ! Unless he his bringing new players or he wants to know who to get rid of ,if the rumours doing the rounds about players not signing next season ,it could be a complete new squad.😇

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.142.234.240

RE: New blood by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 17:58:46, 321 views. In reply to 'New blood'

Gives him a good chance to assess who he will want to keep and not keep, ahead of the pre-season period. Like when we appointed Rudy at this point of the season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.254.18

RE: New blood by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 18:07:12, 288 views. In reply to 'New blood'

What rumours? Am intrigued.

There’s usually quite a big turnover of players at this level - remember how much the team changed from the last squad at Brid and the first at the new ground. Even more would surely be expected with a new manager coming in. This squad has had terrible form in the last few months anyway

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.69.145.123

RE: RE: New blood by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 19:00:26, 293 views. In reply to 'RE: New blood'

Rumour. A forward ,a centre half, a goalie .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.142.234.240

RE: RE: RE: New blood by Warrior

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 19:38:38, 313 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: New blood'

people have moaned about our players all season is it really a concern if the majority of them left

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.191.61.185

RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood by Rockett Fuel User: Rockett Fuel

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 22:18:17, 260 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: New blood'

Rumour? You don’t need a rumour to figure out that Walshaw is sadly likely to follow Kittrick out of the club (didn’t they car share?), and Tommy Taylor is likely to move on to better things next year.

*Evo-Stik Division 1 North Runners-Up 2017-18* *NCEL Premier Division Champions 2012-13* *NCEL Division 1 Champions 2008-09*

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 148.252.128.224

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood by Cynic

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 22:39:38, 251 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood'

Probably right about Tommy but I wouldn’t have thought arranging alternative car sharing was insurmountable. If Wally leaves, I suspect it will be for other reasons.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 195.224.28.2

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 22:54:40, 267 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood'

Deacey was Wally’s manager at Farsley and Wally tonight tweeted “great appointment".

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.249.49

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood by beckywitch User: beckywitch

Posted: 3/4/2019 at 08:03:32, 257 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood'

Yes, I thought Wally would be staying - or hoping to - when I saw that.

beckywitch

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:8673:d700:8

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood by Terry Hope

Posted: 3/4/2019 at 10:53:27, 254 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood'

Do you have any inside information on Walshaw then Geoff? Could be just a rumour of course.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood by geoff hooley

Posted: 3/4/2019 at 11:46:22, 292 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood'

99% wally leaves, and he never shared car with kitty ,

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood by Terry Hope

Posted: 3/4/2019 at 13:59:03, 261 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood'

Presume to be 100% sure you’d have to be related to him Geoff?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

Want to adjust your 99% guess Geoff ? by Cynic Al

Posted: 3/4/2019 at 15:52:22, 253 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: New blood'

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/james-walshaw-relishing-chance-to-re-form-link-with-new-scarborough-athletic-boss-john-deacey-1-9689285

I know it’s newspaper talk but …. sounds positive. But then again, his wages (or expected wages) might be a stumbling block. Guess we will find out in time.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 37.72.113.170

RE: Want to adjust your 99% guess Geoff ? by Terry Hope

Posted: 3/4/2019 at 16:00:33, 246 views. In reply to 'Want to adjust your 99% guess Geoff ?'

Yes even if a newspaper article it sounds really positive and no mention of his Grandad

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 178.78.99.91

RE: RE: Want to adjust your 99% guess Geoff ? by Seamer unreg.

Posted: 3/4/2019 at 16:30:37, 299 views. In reply to 'RE: Want to adjust your 99% guess Geoff ?'

Near the end of last season I was chatting with Walshaw’s grandad and he mentioned that this season may be his last but would see how he felt after this season. Wally must feel he still has a lot to offer to the club and with his old manager joining Boro he can do a job for him next season. His record stands for himself and i’m sure the manager would welcome Wally back next season.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.157.69.34

RE: RE: RE: Want to adjust your 99% guess Geoff ? by Ernie Moss’s towering headers

Posted: 3/4/2019 at 20:49:42, 319 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Want to adjust your 99% guess Geoff ?'

Wally is top scorer in the league and definitely not been firing on all cylinders, far from it, yet somehow still top of the charts? Yes he’s getting on a bit, yes he’s lazy but he’ll get 20 goals next season without a doubt. decent winger (Hi Max if you’re reading this !) brought in and he’ll knock on 30 goals. Hope he stays.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.254.92.13

RE: RE: RE: RE: Want to adjust your 99% guess Geoff ? by Cynic

Posted: 4/4/2019 at 21:05:11, 243 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Want to adjust your 99% guess Geoff ?'

Wally is lazy? If only he had the work-rate of for, purely at random, Ernie Moss. FFS, he might have his faults but he actually works his balls off.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.41.66.110

RE: New blood by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 4/4/2019 at 18:47:42, 300 views. In reply to 'New blood'

“Can’t see why with season nearly over, we get a new manager"

Right, for starters let’s turn this observation on it’s head and instead ask Geoff when is the best time of the season to get a new manager?

I actually think this is the perfect time to bring a new manager in:

1) The season was fizzling out (bar the NRSC cup final), and crowds were dwindling. That drop in income can be weighed against whatever the cost is/was of terminating SK’s contract early.

2) Whatever JD’s comments about still fighting for the play-offs, the season - in terms of promotion hopes - is all but over. Yes, we *could* scrape into the play-offs, and then maybe, just maybe we could win promotion. But, it’s a very long shot. I’ll be over the moon if we do achieve it, and I’ll eat my newly acquired Lower Breck hat if we do (but I’ll need gravy). We’re in no danger of relegation, so you could argue it’s a no risk decision to change the manager right now.

3) JD was signed after the transfer deadline. This locks him into the current squad. It prevents him from diving in with new signings, and potentially ballooning the playing budget at the end of this season (I’m not implying that he would have, but the temptation to do so has been taken away)

4) Further to point 3), this forces JD to take time to assess the current squad over the final games. He knows who is and isn’t on contract, when those contracts are up, who has contract options, and who can be released at the end of the season.

5) Further to point 4), the board now has a chance to assess how good JD is at turning round a struggling squad. We get to see how good he is as a coach, a leader, and a motivator. A lot of managers like to make an impact by bringing in new players as a quick fix. JD hasn’t got that option. See point 3) above.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

Like n/t by Nick Finch

Posted: 4/4/2019 at 20:07:03, 212 views. In reply to 'RE: New blood'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a01:4c8:80b:48d1:1:

RE: RE: New blood by geoff hooley

Posted: 5/4/2019 at 07:30:01, 225 views. In reply to 'RE: New blood'

lets just hope he does not sign is lad, he walked out of dug out ,when is lad got some stick off the crowd.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: RE: RE: New blood by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 5/4/2019 at 13:47:27, 222 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: New blood'

I don’t care who he does or doesn’t sign (although it won’t be anyone at all before July.)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.248.95

RE: RE: RE: New blood by Tree unreg

Posted: 5/4/2019 at 19:39:18, 241 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: New blood'

Good job our fanbase is scrupulously fair, and would never dish out criticism unreasonably or without giving someone a fair go. 🙄

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: RE: New blood by Tree unreg

Posted: 5/4/2019 at 19:36:35, 206 views. In reply to 'RE: New blood'

Yup, couldn’t agree more. An extremely well reasoned post.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

Thread: 92306

Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey by Old Git

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 16:59:12, 311 views.

After a lengthy selection process, Scarborough Athletic have appointed their new manager.

Former Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey has taken the reins with immediate effect.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 88.144.8.240

interviews on S News & your e-mail inbox by Old Git

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 17:30:48, 171 views. In reply to 'Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey'

so plenty to chew on.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 88.144.8.240

and now @safc site by Old Git

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 17:33:01, 156 views. In reply to 'interviews on S News & your e-mail inbox'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 88.144.8.240

RE: Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 17:52:51, 219 views. In reply to 'Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey'

Seems a “deacent" appointment (I’ll get my coat), let’s all get behind him.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.254.18

RE: RE: Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 18:09:32, 211 views. In reply to 'RE: Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey'

Yes, we should all “john” together as fans and give him our support

(shall I get mine?)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.69.145.123

RE: Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 18:36:45, 226 views. In reply to 'Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey'

I know nothing about him other than what I’ve read and seen in the last hour, but preliminary thoughts are that he fits the profile of someone who can take us forward. Encouraging to hear talk of attractive style of play and developing young players.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: RE: Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey by Dan

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 23:38:20, 191 views. In reply to 'RE: Bradford Park Avenue and Farsley Celtic chief John Deacey'

Interestingly, his usual choice of assistant is Mark Hume, according to this link he took the BPA job on the proviso that Hume would be allowed to join him

http://nonleague.pitchero.com/uncategorized/deacey-praises-his-number-two-2234/

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.221.244

Thread: 92304

Manager announcement at 5pm by gomersal seadog User: gomersal seadog

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 09:41:04, 223 views.

According to Martin in SEN breaking news article

GOMERSAL SEADOG

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:9b03:2500:

Also on YCRadio. N/T. by Seamer unreg

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 10:10:02, 172 views. In reply to 'Manager announcement at 5pm'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.157.69.34

Manager by Seasick Seadog User: Seasick Seadog

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 12:20:03, 209 views. In reply to 'Manager announcement at 5pm'

I’ll give it 30 mins before someone complains about the choice!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e2c:4300:9

Manager by Seasick Seadog User: Seasick Seadog

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 12:20:14, 205 views. In reply to 'Manager announcement at 5pm'

I’ll give it 30 mins before someone complains about the choice!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e2c:4300:9

RE: Manager by Seamer unreg

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 12:32:44, 200 views. In reply to 'Manager'

As long as that? We wait with bated breath.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.157.69.34

If I was a betting man my money would be on…. by MAlcD

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 13:53:48, 267 views. In reply to 'Manager announcement at 5pm'

The current manager until the end of the season :)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.78.18.166

RE: If I was a betting man my money would be on…. by geoff hooley

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 15:08:34, 219 views. In reply to 'If I was a betting man my money would be on….'

you would lose your money

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

RE: If I was a betting man my money would be on…. by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 15:22:41, 225 views. In reply to 'If I was a betting man my money would be on….'

Steve’s post-match interview on Saturday seemed to suggest otherwise. I’m not saying you’re wrong btw, just that Steve almost said as much.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: RE: If I was a betting man my money would be on…. by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 17:43:34, 171 views. In reply to 'RE: If I was a betting man my money would be on….'

I wonder if he was surprised .?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.142.234.240

Thread: 92302

U19’s - next step? by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 15:11:59, 167 views.

Where next for the U19 team? The Northern U19 Alliance Football League was the obvious one to start out in, but should Denny & Ryan be looking to get the squad in front of stronger opposition? The league itself is quite small, with only 7 teams (or maybe 6 now - I’m not sure what’s happened with the Liversedge side), and therefore there is a limited number of fixtures. If they want more games in the season, is the National League U19 Alliance an option for us? Current teams in Division I include:

Guiseley AFC U19 Academy
York City FC U19
Gateshead FC U19s
South Shields U19s
FC Halifax Town U19
Carlisle United
Eccleshill United
Harrogate Town FC U19 (College)
Darlington FC U19s
Frickley Athletic FC U19
Farsley Celtic FC U19

Thoughts?

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.7.64.69

RE: U19’s - next step? by Cynic

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 15:36:10, 179 views. In reply to 'U19’s - next step?'

Seems a good idea in theory. From a financial POV Carlisle is a slight downer. Any idea how Eccleshill manage Simon? I wouldn’t have thought they were a natural mix given the size and potential of some of the other clubs involved.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.63.99

RE: RE: U19’s - next step? by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 17:19:47, 216 views. In reply to 'RE: U19’s - next step?'

No idea about Eccleshill, sorry. Just spotted that City of Liverpool have a team in Division J, so there does appear to be a mix of teams from different steps in there.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.7.64.69

Thread: 92301

EvoStik Division One by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 10:58:42, 238 views.

I’m reading that the EvoStik Division One is no longer going to be split East/West next season, and will instead become Div One North West, and Div One South East. Apparently the clubs have all been informed already, but I’ve not been able to find any announcement from the league. Doesn’t affect us directly, but always interesting to know what’s going on around us!

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.7.64.69

RE: EvoStik Division One by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 14:10:10, 201 views. In reply to 'EvoStik Division One'

Northwest and Southeast? I can’t see the likes of Marske or Dunston fitting very well into one of those categories.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.250.169

RE: RE: EvoStik Division One by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 14:33:06, 164 views. In reply to 'RE: EvoStik Division One'

How about this projected line up for D1NW (nicked from the Non League Matters forum projections spreadsheet)? I guess travel time for Dunston in that league would be no worse than Morpeth have had in D1E this year travelling to the likes of Spalding, Stamford and Wisbech.

Brighouse Town
City of Liverpool
Clitheroe
Colne
Droylsden
Dunston U.T.S.
Glossop North End
Kendal Town
Marske United
Mossley
Ossett United
Pickering Town
Pontefract Collieries
Prescot Cables
Ramsbottom United
Runcorn Linnets
Tadcaster Albion
Trafford
Widnes
Workington

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.7.64.69

RE: RE: RE: EvoStik Division One by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 14:58:47, 167 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: EvoStik Division One'

On what planet is Dunston in the North West?! And Tadcaster/Pontefract/Pickering for that matter!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 161.73.113.134

RE: RE: RE: RE: EvoStik Division One by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 15:14:23, 162 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: EvoStik Division One'

Well, it’s not in the south east either is it? Maybe if you say Div 1 North AND West it makes more sense? Along with Div 1 South AND East.

As ever, you have to draw the line somewhere to split the clubs into two groups. We’ve had horizontal and vertical. Now’s the time for a diagonal dividing line!

To be honest, it seems quite a sensible idea to me.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.7.64.69

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: EvoStik Division One by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 16:56:58, 146 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: EvoStik Division One'

What we really need is probably three smaller leagues in the north at that level, and not two. North, East, and West.

North could be made up of anyone north of the M62, and Manchester/Liverpool teams:

Brighouse
City of Liverpool
Clitheroe
Colne
Droylsden
Dunston
Kendal
Marske
Mossley
Ossett United
Pickering
Prescot
Ramsbottom
Tadcaster
Trafford
Widnes
Workington

East could then be teams such as:

Mansfield
Belper
Cleethorpes
Frickley
Ilkeston
Lincoln
Loughborough
Mickleover
Sheffield
Stamford
Spalding
Stocksbridge
Wisbech
Worksop

And the West could be:

Glossop
Runcorn
Chasetown
Kidsgrove
Leek
Market Drayton
Newcastle
Sutton Coldfield

We’d be left a few teams short, but then some of the teams from the Midlands could switch into the West/East divisions I’m sure.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 161.73.113.134

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: EvoStik Division One by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 17:03:09, 164 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: EvoStik Division One'

There is another Step 4 league coming (I think) in the next couple of years. I believe the Northern League have applied to run it, so chuck that into the mix…….no idea if the current EvoStik D1 rejig is being done with that in mind or not.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.7.64.69

Evo Stik Division 1 by North Notts Seadog User: North Notts Seadog

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 07:50:01, 138 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: EvoStik Division One'

Can`t help but think Dewsbury’s proper `April Fooled` a few of you with this!!

On the basis of having experienced both formats of Division 1, which would you prefer; the current one or reverting back to North/South and if so which league?

Edited on 02/04/19 at 07:51:06

Edited on 02/04/19 at 08:25:19
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 93.93.223.187

RE: Evo Stik Division 1 by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 09:54:15, 133 views. In reply to 'Evo Stik Division 1'

No April Fool’s I’m afraid. Well at least I don’t think so, as the North/West and South/East arrangement was being discussed on the non-league matters forum over the weekend.

https://www.nonleaguematters.co.uk/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_view_flat;post=900039;page=27;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;mh=25;guest=315870604

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

RE: RE: Evo Stik Division 1 by North Notts Seadog User: North Notts Seadog

Posted: 2/4/2019 at 10:03:33, 125 views. In reply to 'RE: Evo Stik Division 1'

Mmm, confused! Looking at the way it`s worded Dewsbury, is that not what we had previously? Do you think it will mean that the leagues will be taking in clubs from further South like before?

Edited on 02/04/19 at 10:19:41
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 93.93.223.184

Thread: 92300

Sponsor for new stand by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 09:53:11, 316 views.

http://scarboroughathletic.com/news/2019-04-01/sponsor-for-new-stand

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 148.252.197.250

RE: Sponsor for new stand by Seamer unreg

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 10:46:54, 199 views. In reply to 'Sponsor for new stand'

Great news Steve, should go down well here in Whitby.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.157.69.34

Nice one Steve, there’s always one. NT. by Seamer unreg

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 10:50:26, 149 views. In reply to 'RE: Sponsor for new stand'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.157.69.34

Thread: 92297

U19s Cup Final some photos by Old Git

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 22:56:08, 124 views.

This is worse than ‘Dr Sheldon Cooper’s Fun With Flags’
As we go for another link, this time on Facebook
where it appears that Facebook has removed the option for ‘link’
that existed the last time I looked.
So this link is the best I can offer unless you again
visit Harry Sment and select ‘photos’ then ‘albums’.

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100004215496429&sk=photos&collection_token=100004215496429%3A2305272732%3A69&set=a.1258794010937770&type=3

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.65.42.116

Film reference 1931 by Old Git

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 22:59:10, 144 views. In reply to 'U19s Cup Final some photos'

‘It’s Alive’

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.65.42.116

Thread: 92293

U19s collect medals & Cup VIDEO by Old Git

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 21:14:13, 140 views.

at this link and also at www.youtube.com/BionicBarmby

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmQVMqM–co&ab_channel=BionicBarmby

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.65.42.116

oops dodgy link by Old Git

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 21:19:52, 100 views. In reply to 'U19s collect medals & Cup VIDEO'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.65.42.116

can’t make it work by Old Git

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 21:22:28, 97 views. In reply to 'oops dodgy link'

but it should be here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmQVMqM–co&ab_channel=BionicBarmby

Ican’t view it myself unless I sign in
so no idea WTF is up with it.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.65.42.116

Stuck it on Facebook at Harry Sment by Old Git

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 21:29:51, 108 views. In reply to 'can’t make it work'

Can also now view it without signing in on youtube
but that first link doesn’t work.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.65.42.116

nice work OG by Dunno

Posted: 1/4/2019 at 05:23:05, 102 views. In reply to 'Stuck it on Facebook at Harry Sment'

and congratulations lads. The future is bright.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:6e1c:c800:3

Thread: 92290

golden gamble no by villager

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 13:09:32, 114 views.

Once again never got to hear the result any ideas please

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.130.213

Number by Nick Finch

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 13:23:25, 117 views. In reply to 'golden gamble no '

I walked around with a board shouting it out twice. The details were also provided over the tannoy.

I cannot remember the number but it was claimed.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a01:4c8:c3e:dd4f:1:

No 39001. N/t by Seamer unreg

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 13:59:27, 107 views. In reply to 'Number'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.157.69.34

did not hear by notgamblegirl

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 17:11:45, 117 views. In reply to 'No 39001. N/t'

any announcements yesterday yet Mark was there, surely not problems with the speakers again

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.150.110.151

Nope. Fixed and working fine n/t by Nick Finch

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 17:26:04, 134 views. In reply to 'did not hear'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.144.216.63

Could not hear any tannoy by The Red Baron User: The Red Baron

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 19:03:32, 132 views. In reply to 'Nope. Fixed and working fine n/t'

on the donkey field side at all

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:ef09:8200:

Thread: 92286

Today by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 30/3/2019 at 20:41:04, 217 views.

Felt sorry for the Manager. He really wanted a first win at home at the helm. Sadly, not meant to be. It felt to me like the team are trying to shake off a lingering hangover, with parts of the game looking no different to the last weeks. It also looked a bit disparate. The Manager has been getting support from some of the senior players and today I witnessed two very different examples of their help on the pitch: Walshaw gave constructive advice, instruction, encouragement and praise - the polar opposite was Burgess, who screamed, ranted and yelled - unhelpful and divisive. He perhaps needs to concentrate on eradicating his own mistakes instead of castigating others so vociferously. Matty Bowman was a breath of fresh air at the back and actually attempted to play the ball out.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:d

RE: Today by geoff hooley

Posted: 30/3/2019 at 21:36:17, 242 views. In reply to 'Today'

totally agree with your comments , burgess is a legend in his own mind, ,but he,s not alone brooksby is on par , maybe got one decent pass together today ,

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

Today by Riponseadog

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 07:52:49, 204 views. In reply to 'RE: Today'

I personally heard kev encouraging young matty alot through the game. Yes i also heard him bollock caddy later on but for me i thought he had a very good game. Won most headers blocked lots and put in some great tackles. Worryingly for me although Lancaster were on a good run they created far more chances than we did. Tommy mom says it all, and although we feel unlucky not to win Lancaster deserved at leadt a point and if their no 10 was as good as he thinks he is they would have beaten us easily, he missed 2 sitters and a few half chances. Still a shame we didnt hang on as only Bailey will know his reason for the hand ball which was a deff penalty.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.69.144.29

Thread: 92285

School Uniform Exchange by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 29/3/2019 at 20:23:21, 244 views.

In true Voice of Treason style, could anyone help out with a random request please? A Boro fan has a load of old school trousers that he wants to donate to a Uniform Exchange charity based near me in Dewsbury, West Yorks. I’m not going to the game tomorrow, so we’re looking for a West Riding based fan who would be willing to pick these trousers up tomorrow, and bring them over to the Leeds area.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

Help Offered by gomersal seadog User: gomersal seadog

Posted: 30/3/2019 at 05:59:40, 191 views. In reply to 'School Uniform Exchange'

Hi Simon
I am going to the match tomorrow by car,so could get them to Gomersal for you. Let me know by 9.30 on sat morning, 07900-168617, as I will be driving from that time

Edited on 30/03/19 at 06:49:08
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:9b03:2500:

RE: Help Offered by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 30/3/2019 at 10:45:49, 214 views. In reply to 'Help Offered'

Cheers gomersal. Hopefully someone has been in touch already. Failing that Tommy Taylor has also put his hand up to bring the stuff back to Kirklees. Thanks to both of you!

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.132.219.128

Done-ring me to arrange collection n/t by gomersal seadog User: gomersal seadog

Posted: 31/3/2019 at 10:53:04, 102 views. In reply to 'RE: Help Offered'


GOMERSAL SEADOG

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:9b03:2500:

Thread: 92284

not football related but by notgamblegirl

Posted: 27/3/2019 at 21:32:03, 393 views.

does anyone have any bubble wrap?

I am moving home and needs some, no shops in scarborough seem to sell it

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.150.110.151

Bubblewrap by Carol Walker

Posted: 28/3/2019 at 12:40:47, 369 views. In reply to 'not football related but'

Argos do it

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.73.56.31

Ok by notgamblegirl

Posted: 29/3/2019 at 17:32:35, 180 views. In reply to 'Bubblewrap'

thanks

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.150.110.151

Thread: 92266

North Ferriby United by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 14:43:06, 329 views.

Officially confirmed; as expected, North Ferriby’s playing record this season is to be expunged.

http://www.evostikleague.co.uk/statement-north-ferriby-united-56076

Edited on 24/03/19 at 14:44:11
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

Thread: 92265

Rudy funk by Boro345

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 07:29:30, 408 views.

I have been seeing a lot of talk about Rudy returning to the club, surely the board are not considering this as it would be a massive step backwards, will always be a club legend but we need a new man with new ideas

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:8666:ab00:e

RE: Rudy funk by Tree unreg

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 10:21:08, 326 views. In reply to 'Rudy funk'

I don’t see it myself. Rudy was great for the club, but I think it’s been repeatedly shown that he’s had his success at levels below our present standard.

SK was the right appointment at the right time, having experience at this level and above. I’d like to see us following a similar pattern this time out, someone with a track record at this level and beyond.

That said, and to contradict myself slightly, I’d love to see Kev Nicholson considered. He did a stalwart job at Torquay. I’m not sure if the geography works, he looks to be based in the south west still, but would be worth a conversation to find out.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: RE: Rudy funk by Boro345

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 13:27:18, 335 views. In reply to 'RE: Rudy funk'

Agreed, although my choice is Darren Kelly from Hyde seems to have some very good coaching qualifications and has done s decent job at Hyde with a rubbish budget

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a01:4c8:c38:6dad:b1

RE: RE: RE: Rudy funk by Cynic

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 13:36:40, 351 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Rudy funk'

a) Do we know it’s a rubbish budget

and

b) Geography and demographics probably means you get more for your budget in gtr Manchester than N.Yorks.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 80.41.71.166

RE: Rudy funk by Cumbria seadog

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 13:34:52, 299 views. In reply to 'Rudy funk'

Rudy was at Buxton yesterday

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 85.255.235.139

Thread: 92264

Reality by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 23/3/2019 at 21:42:18, 385 views.

Before long the penny will drop.and people will realise that this team is not good enough.Great idea to have senior players have a say who plays ,what a joke.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.27.51.201

This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness…… by mrs trellis User: mrs trellis

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 10:09:38, 324 views. In reply to 'Reality'

What would you liked to have happened in a week?

“When will the penny drop?" If only the board had taken immediate decisive action after last Saturday’s match!

Or should we conclude that you are seriously suggesting that in that week Steve Roberts could or should have made drastic changes to the squad?
Perhaps you feel that the board should have authorised Steve as interim manager to go out and get six or seven new players.

As a start the two alienated players (Gooda and Cadman) have been brought fully back into the fold and the start of a change in style was evident. The supporters, I spoke to before the game yesterday generally felt that the team selected was more or less the best available. We left disappointed with the result but happy with the effort and application.

We know there is a lot that needs changing but there were some good signs yesterday. Ranting and raving after a week makes you look a little bit silly. Again.

Who else should be supporting Steve in the run in to the end of the season? Presumably we have incurred expense on terminating SK’s contract. Are you advocating bringing in the additional expense of another coach when we have Mezzer with coaching experience and around 300 appearances at this level? In terms of financial responsibility for running the club one solution is a joke, the other a great idea.

Steve R. has had one week to solve the problems. The same length of time you’ve had to provide evidence for the ridiculous allegations you made about Jack Johnson on here last week.
From what I’ve seen only one of you has made progress.

Not everyone can be this silly but it is nice to see so many trying.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:aeee:1c00:4

RE: This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness…… by laseadog User: laseadog

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 11:30:19, 275 views. In reply to 'This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness……'

I don’t think Geoff’s opinion is an 8 out of 10 - I too agree with him that the team are not good enough. For any team to be good and challenging, you need a strong spine and we have half a strong spine. Our centre backs, are not good enough to challenge for an Evo Stick title. They are bang average, lack the ability to read a game, decision making isn’t great, but they can win a header (some people who lack a footballing brain can be AMAZED at a centre back winning a header and think they are brilliant). You say you want them playing by passing out, but they are not good enough on the ball to do that.
Our centre mids, Luke Dean is good. However, Watson is a good mid evo-stick premier player, however there is a reason Farsley let him go, and let’s not forget they are top of the league (where we want to be). The last midfield place has interchanged throughout the season so it is hard to comment on, but that’s a sign itself - nobody has really stood out in centre mid. Finally, Walshaw is a good standard striker for this level. Therefore, I agree with Geoff - the team are not good enough to be challenging at this level.
Aren’t we taught in primary school that everybody is entitled to an opinion, maybe you need to revisit that.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c5:ed97:1500:

RE: RE: This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness…… by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 12:22:21, 256 views. In reply to 'RE: This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness……'

In fairness, that wasn’t really Mrs Trellis’ point - he acknowledges the need to sort things out on the playing side.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

RE: This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness…… by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 16:40:44, 296 views. In reply to 'This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness……'

A player who couldn’t get a regular place in the team ,ends up picking the team .and gets a place . As for Jack i didn’t see his name on the sheet . Never got 8./10 before thanks

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.27.51.201

RE: RE: This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness…… by Tree User: Tree

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 16:53:03, 285 views. In reply to 'RE: This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness……'

Jack wasn’t in the team last week, not even in the squad.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.30.88.118

The team was picked by the manager by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 17:56:45, 352 views. In reply to 'RE: This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness……'

who as always, has the final say.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.248.151

8/10 by geoff hooley

Posted: 30/3/2019 at 19:13:08, 119 views. In reply to 'This week I give Geoff 8/10 for ridiculousness……'

seems my ridiculous allegation about JJ is not pie in the sky. no sign of him (AGAIN). and no info from the club to say if he,s left or injured . (sorry for being silly)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

Re: Reality by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 10:10:43, 276 views. In reply to 'Reality'

Watching the game yesterday I saw signs of positive shifts: We were back to our battling ways, we were unlucky to not manage to put our chances away, the penalty save was top class and I thought that the score line was not indicative of the play. As the manager said in his interview- it might take a bit of time to get them playing as he wants. Yesterday, for me, during the first half there were still too many long, aimless, high balls from the back- it’s perhaps debatable as to whether that is because they are used to playing that way, a lack of confidence and just wanting to get rid of the ball, or if indeed that is all they are capable of. As our players were ‘good enough’ to get us to the top of the league for a while not so long ago, I’m agreeing with the manager and can’t wait to see us back to our playing our best and to winning ways.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:d

Thread: 92263

1628 by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 23/3/2019 at 20:59:42, 288 views.

Blimey. Top of the table clash in the NCEL Prem today, with 1628 turning out to watch Worksop Town v Penistone Church.

Season average for them thus far has been 409, so presumably there has been some fantastic push/promotion for the game today?

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

RE: 1628 by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 24/3/2019 at 21:22:59, 322 views. In reply to '1628'

Could it be a misprint? Maybe it should be 628 not 1,628.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:a

Definitely 1,628 for a number of reasons. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 25/3/2019 at 08:06:02, 449 views. In reply to 'RE: 1628'

1st vs 2nd in the league. Effectively won them the title, as a large gap has opened up.
Sheffield Wednesday and United not playing because of international break.
Penistone brought about 150-170.
Big social media push to try and break 1,000.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.