Newest Message: RE: RE: re Help by Patto_89 on 18/6/2019, 21:08:56 - View Thread

3

Thread: 92216

Cup final by William Kent

Posted: 5/3/2019 at 22:59:39, 329 views.

Anyone know where the cup final is played

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

RE: Cup final by Old Seadog User: Old Seadog

Posted: 7/3/2019 at 15:40:42, 285 views. In reply to 'Cup final'

I believe the ground is decided after the finalists are known

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 79.69.137.54

RE: Cup final by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 8/3/2019 at 12:57:14, 215 views. In reply to 'Cup final'

usually middlesborough or Farsley

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.254.104.28

RE: RE: Cup final by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 8/3/2019 at 13:59:35, 302 views. In reply to 'RE: Cup final'

Farsley? Are you sure? They are in the West Riding FA.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.19.6.146

RE: RE: RE: Cup final by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 8/3/2019 at 15:50:41, 254 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Cup final'

I’m sure the players would like it to be at somewhere like The Riverside but wouldn’t it be nice to hold it at the FLS.

Especially if Middlesbro get through to the final again - then we could justify it on the grounds that they played last season’s final at home so we should be at home this season!

I’m sure we would get a much bigger crowd than last year’s final (which only attracted just over 1,000). And it would make for a much better atmosphere than 1,000 people rattling around in a 34,000 seater stadium.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:4

Guaranteed to be Middlesbrough by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 8/3/2019 at 21:43:59, 208 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Cup final'

As someone I was speaking to the other day put it, “the suits will want their 3-course slap up meal at a Premier League standard ground".

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 82.43.217.44

RE: RE: RE: Cup final by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 8/3/2019 at 22:01:06, 247 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Cup final'

Josh is getting very confused and mistaking it with the Evostik League cup final which was at Farsley the year we were there but has been held at various different venues!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 92.30.252.128

RE: RE: RE: RE: Cup final by joshlawrance User: joshlawrance

Posted: 11/3/2019 at 13:12:38, 181 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Cup final'

when you’re right, you’re right you know.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.254.104.28

Thread: 92215

FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 5/3/2019 at 21:51:46, 273 views.

3-0 on penalties
Attendance: 1608

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.92.90

RE: FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 5/3/2019 at 22:06:21, 262 views. In reply to 'FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties'

The cheers for those penalties could literally be heard a mile away. Seriously, cos that’s where I was and I could hear them clear as day (or rather night)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

RE: RE: FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 5/3/2019 at 22:30:55, 270 views. In reply to 'RE: FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties'

Any news on Coulson’s injury? Hope it’s nothing serious.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.90.92

RE: RE: RE: FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 5/3/2019 at 22:52:00, 265 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties'

Me too. I’m hoping it’s like with Lofts at Nantwich where it turns out to be not as serious as it first seemed.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

RE: RE: RE: RE: FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties by Seamer unreg

Posted: 5/3/2019 at 23:12:06, 305 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties'

Tonight’s attendance of 1608 is the biggest for a North Riding Senior Cup tie with the exception of finals.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.158.115

Attendance by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 5/3/2019 at 23:28:20, 323 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties'

It’s also our biggest ever midweek crowd as Scarborough Athletic smashing the previous record by over 300.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Tonights game by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 5/3/2019 at 23:06:19, 364 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: FT: Boro 0-0 York City - Boro win on penalties'

Thought it was a well fought out match by two equal sides. Not a lot of chances in the game but both sides had a couple of good chances to snatch the win. York were a decent footballing side and about halfway through the 2nd half I was expecting them to come on strong with their fitness but Boro dug in & finished well. 0-0 a fair result. I could not believe the difference in our penalties and theirs. They were hopeless, the first down the middle for Tommy to save with his legs & their next two ballooned over the bar. Our 3 were all perfect and placed well into the bottom corner and unstoppable - Wally, Wayne & Killer. Only real down side was the injury to Coulo who had to limp off. Just hope he hasn’t broken anything or that is the end of his season. Vallo looked to be in pain in last few minutes but as we had used all our subs he had to stay on, so again hope he is ok as he worked hard throughout the match & got stuck in. Wayne Brooksby had a decent game as well and looking more like his old self. Nice to see Cadders and Bailey get a run out - the team badly needs them back to match fitness as soon as. All in all a good game watched by an enthusiastic & great crowd for what some people call a tin pot trophy. But we are in the final again & look forward to another trip to Middlesboro. Well done to all.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.155.22

totally agree with burniston by seadog2019

Posted: 6/3/2019 at 07:41:26, 352 views. In reply to 'Tonights game'

fingers crossed for Coulo

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 91.110.242.99

Thread: 92214

Witton Albion by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 4/3/2019 at 09:54:38, 376 views.

Away from the predictable fallout from most fans following Saturday’s result, can I just say that I thought we played some good football in the first half. Brooksby was used well out on the right wing, and we were getting some decent balls into feet in and around the box. Lofts also did well out on the left. Our goal was a great effort from Wally, but it was built on some great build up play beforehand.

In my opinion we shot ourselves in the foot in the 2nd half by being too defensive. Time wasting with 20+ minutes left to play was just foolish, plus I think we switched to 5 at the back at some point instead of going looking for the 2nd goal.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

Agree completely… by snainton seadog User: snainton seadog

Posted: 4/3/2019 at 19:41:24, 345 views. In reply to 'Witton Albion'

Concerned Steve thought the opposite tbh too.

-- UP THE BORO

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.159

RE: Agree completely… by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 5/3/2019 at 15:51:33, 256 views. In reply to 'Agree completely…'

I thought SK said that he was annoyed that they went too deep & wanted them to push up more which they presumably failed to do.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 95.146.129.120

Thread: 92213

Facebook comments by The Oracle User: The Oracle

Posted: 3/3/2019 at 09:10:30, 279 views.

I have just been reading the rants and raves on Facebook regarding who gets paid what. I have been a joint owner since day one have attended every AGM and Fans Forum and study the annual accounts each year. In spite of this I don’t have a clue who earns what at the club yet all these financial geniuses on Facebook appear to have this information. I would be obliged, therefore, if they could substantiate their claims and where they get the figures from because as a joint owner I should surely also be entitled to this information!

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:e04:5c00:8

Thread: 92212

Steve Kittrick interview… by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 22:06:48, 349 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-scarborough-athletic-boss-steve-kittrick-on-the-loss-against-witton-1-9626550

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.132

Goodas position untenable by inblottysfootsteps User: inblottysfootsteps

Posted: 3/3/2019 at 05:52:13, 369 views. In reply to 'Steve Kittrick interview…'

so hero Gooda was left out for a reason, frankly a reason good enough to get you or me sacked.

he has a contract paid week in week out regardless, dont play for 6 week then dont warm up then clears off home halfway through the game without saying owt… what would your boss say next time you turned up for work.?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.158.215.214

Goodas position untenable by inblottysfootsteps User: inblottysfootsteps

Posted: 3/3/2019 at 05:52:14, 333 views. In reply to 'Steve Kittrick interview…'

so hero Gooda was left out for a reason, frankly a reason good enough to get you or me sacked.

he has a contract paid week in week out regardless, dont play for 6 week then dont warm up then clears off home halfway through the game without saying owt… what would your boss say next time you turned up for work.?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.158.215.214

Which players? by Southern dog

Posted: 3/3/2019 at 08:04:00, 328 views. In reply to 'Steve Kittrick interview…'

Wasn’t at the game. Anybody say who the 5 or 6 players are?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 94.197.121.228

RE: Which players? by geoff hooley

Posted: 3/3/2019 at 09:12:17, 375 views. In reply to 'Which players?'

one up front two in midfield & three at the back. ,brave man on here if he names them .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a00:23c4:7487:d300:

Even braver if you use your own😉 n/t by Nick Finch

Posted: 3/3/2019 at 20:11:35, 320 views. In reply to 'RE: Which players?'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 185.201.60.16

Thread: 92211

It’s been crap since before Xmas by Joe90

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 17:05:38, 289 views.

And the odd win has scraped him through.. but it’s clear to me it’s just smoke and mirrors the signings, the constant changing of the defence, the inability to drop big name players.. was once a SK fan but for the past few months his team selection, his post match interviews have been baffling. I hope next year we make a change and a overhaul of the squad because they don’t cut it.. the removal of the assistant was just a diversion and not the real root cause.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.78

RE: It’s been crap since before Xmas by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 17:27:51, 286 views. In reply to 'It’s been crap since before Xmas'

Which players are you referring to when you say he has an “Inability to drop big name players"?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

RE: RE: It’s been crap since before Xmas by caslad User: caslad

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 18:15:24, 278 views. In reply to 'RE: It’s been crap since before Xmas'

At this time of the season this should be a team pushing hard, brushing aside the Mickleover’s and the Witton’s of the league. Instead we look like a mid-table side with nothing to play for with eyes only on the end of season holiday. Next season won’t be any easier with Ashton and FCUM coming down, other teams have worked us out and know how to beat us. Our home form is a disgrace, it’s certainly no fortress, more like a video game with the instructions laid down on how bland we’ll be. The team itself is adequate for this league but any ideas of it pushing for promotion, never mind succeeding in a higher division, are for the fairies.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 51.7.192.5

RE: RE: It’s been crap since before Xmas by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 18:57:08, 294 views. In reply to 'RE: It’s been crap since before Xmas'

Biggest name. is williamson.😁ha. Kitty as managed again to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory ! Did same last week with the same sub.and we again have given two goals away. Had a chat in club and a person said if he puts the same sub on again we can x bye bye to 3 points.how right he was.he so said another defeat and there would or should be a vacancy. Another point ,is no comments on here about the decrease in home crowd .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.151.162.28

RE: RE: RE: It’s been crap since before Xmas by David malton

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 19:58:44, 296 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: It’s been crap since before Xmas'

Since last season we have wanted a winger with some pace to supply wally and could with crosses to feed on to get goals all we got was midfielders and full backs.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.159

RE: RE: RE: RE: It’s been crap since before Xmas by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 3/3/2019 at 12:09:03, 267 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: It’s been crap since before Xmas'

Ya right . And we got lots of them.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.151.162.28

Thread: 92210

Today’s team by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 14:27:13, 243 views.

Taylor, Lacey, Killock, Willliamson, Davie, Dixon, Valentine,Lofts, Brooksby, Coulson, Walshaw

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

RE: Today’s team by Cynic

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 14:30:34, 222 views. In reply to 'Today’s team'

Do you have the subs 365?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: RE: Today’s team by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 14:40:22, 224 views. In reply to 'RE: Today’s team'

Subs are:

Jack Johnson
Tom Morgan
Kev Burgess
Jamie Forrester
Will Annan

Luke Dean is ill with flu so not available. I assume Mezza, Cadman and Gooda didn’t make the squad but will play Tuesday? Flynn McNaughton has signed for Selby.

Edited on 02/03/19 at 14:40:48
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

RE: RE: RE: Today’s team by Cynic

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 14:50:28, 197 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Today’s team'

Why would you assume that Armchairdog? Just asking as I’m not sure why if they are not available/selected today (am I missing something obvious?)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: RE: RE: RE: Today’s team by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 14:54:54, 195 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Today’s team'

Kittrick gave a pre-match interview to Martin Dowie in which he said he had to leave 3 players out but told them they’d “probably be involved on Tuesday".

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Today’s team by cynic

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 15:00:00, 201 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Today’s team'

Cheers for info.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

1-0 Wally!! n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 15:18:46, 156 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Today’s team'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Latest: Gainsborough Trinity 1-0 Bamber Bridge n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 15:47:14, 164 views. In reply to '1-0 Wally!! n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

Farsley and Nantwich both losing 1-0 by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:07:57, 149 views. In reply to 'Latest: Gainsborough Trinity 1-0 Bamber Bridge n/t'

Warrington winning 2-0

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

Sub for Boro: Burgess on for Davie n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:15:34, 132 views. In reply to 'Farsley and Nantwich both losing 1-0'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

Burgess replaces Davie by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:15:50, 138 views. In reply to 'Farsley and Nantwich both losing 1-0'

Let’s hope what happened last time he came on doesn’t happen!! ;-)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Forrester on for Brooksby n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:21:22, 128 views. In reply to 'Burgess replaces Davie'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Latest: Gainsborough Trinity 2-0 Bamber Bridge n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:30:24, 131 views. In reply to 'Forrester on for Brooksby n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

1-1 Witton penalty equaliser n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:38:49, 124 views. In reply to 'Latest: Gainsborough Trinity 2-0 Bamber Bridge n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

2-1 down !!!! n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:41:34, 163 views. In reply to '1-1 Witton penalty equaliser n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Annan on for Lofts n/t by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:44:29, 149 views. In reply to '2-1 down !!!! n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

FT: Witton Albion 2-1 Boro by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:52:51, 150 views. In reply to 'Annan on for Lofts n/t'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

Latest: Gainsborough Trinity 2-1 BAMBER BRIDGE n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:55:41, 145 views. In reply to 'FT: Witton Albion 2-1 Boro'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

FT: Lancaster City 2-0 Farsley Celtic by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:57:54, 135 views. In reply to 'Latest: Gainsborough Trinity 2-1 BAMBER BRIDGE n/t'

Lancaster have really had a revival since we smashed 6 passed them at their place.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

FT: Mickleover Sports 1-4 Warrington Town by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:58:53, 122 views. In reply to 'FT: Lancaster City 2-0 Farsley Celtic'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

FT: Gainsborough Trinity 2-1 Bamber Bridge by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 17:00:16, 131 views. In reply to 'FT: Mickleover Sports 1-4 Warrington Town'

So we’re now 4 points off a play-off spot.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

Re re re Today’s team by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 17:50:11, 242 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Today’s team'

They were in the stand

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.78

Thread: 92209

Flynn McNaughton by Southern dog

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 10:15:58, 213 views.

Has he left? Gone to Selby?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.226.173

Signed for Selby by Seadog93

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 12:54:32, 214 views. In reply to 'Flynn McNaughton'

http://www.selbytown.co.uk/new-signing-flynn-mcnaughton/

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.159

Carl Stewart by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:12:29, 209 views. In reply to 'Signed for Selby '

I see Carl Stewart is down as one of their players.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.226.187

RE: Carl Stewart by Seadog93

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 16:54:23, 181 views. In reply to 'Carl Stewart'

Believe he is playing at Goole. For now.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 87.112.11.213

Thread: 92208

Football Supporters Federation by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 26/2/2019 at 10:48:53, 337 views.

Does anybody know if the club is an affiliate member of the Football Supporters’ Federation?

And while I’m on the subject, how many Boro fans are signed up as individual members of the FSF? It’s free to join - just fill out the form here: http://www.fsf.org.uk/join/

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

RE: Football Supporters Federation by Dunno

Posted: 26/2/2019 at 18:03:33, 250 views. In reply to 'Football Supporters Federation'

that’s twice in two days you have posted. Are you going for election to the board next time round?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.107

RE: RE: Football Supporters Federation by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 26/2/2019 at 19:22:28, 319 views. In reply to 'RE: Football Supporters Federation'

No.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.69

Thread: 92207

Conference North by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 25/2/2019 at 11:33:34, 1689 views.

Yes, I know it’s now the National League, but I can’t stop myself referring to it as the Conference. Anyway…

Has anybody else spotted that all four relegation spots in the Conference are occupied by decidedly southern teams? They are currently Havant & Waterlooville, Aldershot Town, Maidstone United, and Braintree Town. If it stays this way, all four relegated teams will be put in the Conf South, meaning a couple of current Conf South teams will have to be shifted into Conf North. Therefore we could well see Gloucester City and Oxford City in Conf North next season…

Obviously not of any imminent interest to us (unless you’re a football nerd), but additional travel time, cost etc will need to be factored into the planning for (potential) life in Conf North moving forward.

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.7.64.69

RE: Conference North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 25/2/2019 at 14:22:37, 1006 views. In reply to 'Conference North'

Blimey that’s stretching the definition of “North" to the limit.

Any further south and and northern clubs would have to change their catering for away supporters. Out with the pie & mushy peas and in with houmous & carrot sticks.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.107

RE: RE: Conference North by Dewsbury User: Dewsbury

Posted: 25/2/2019 at 14:51:37, 359 views. In reply to 'RE: Conference North'

Weren’t Gloucester City in Conf North for a number of seasons previously?

Simon Cope - Was Chair Of Something Some Time Ago

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 62.7.64.69

RE: RE: RE: Conference North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 25/2/2019 at 15:05:34, 363 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Conference North'

Yes they have played several times in the Conference North but let’s face it, they’re a “southern" club. Prior to their previous stint in the Conference North they spent 70 years in the Southern League.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.107

RE: RE: RE: RE: Conference North by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 25/2/2019 at 15:58:27, 325 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: Conference North'

Or Lowestoft spending a season in CN which nearly bankrupted them. One memorable Tuesday night fixture was Workington v Lowestoft

I also saw Bishops Stortford v Blyth in the same division.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Conference North by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 25/2/2019 at 16:27:22, 408 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: Conference North'

Crazy. Workington v Lowestoft would be a 660 mile round trip for the away team. Bonkers for a Tuesday night.

Bishop Stortford v Blyth would be a mere 544 mile round trip for Blyth.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.107

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Conference North by willesden seadog User: willesden seadog

Posted: 25/2/2019 at 20:54:14, 418 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Conference North'

What I find crazy is that the FA hammer small clubs who through no fault of their own are put in such a position and risk going bust.

If you don’t take promotion you are forced to drop 2/3 levels.

You can’t advocate financial prudence and slap sanctions on clubs who don’t adhere when you’re crippling them in the first place.

There’s a lot to be said for non-league regional football back in the days before the pyramid.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

I’m OK with Oxford City being shifted. by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 26/2/2019 at 10:47:21, 225 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Conference North'

At my current accommodation during the week, if we were to get a Tuesday fixture, it would be approximately 850ft from my front door to the turnstile.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Thread: 92206

Video Highlights Boro v Mickleover by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 25/2/2019 at 09:10:53, 180 views.

https://youtu.be/cwT9GGekoDI

Edited by admin on 25/02/19 at 10:17:42
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:1

Thread: 92205

Goal time by Seasick seadog User: Seasick seadog

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 19:28:32, 182 views.

Fao Ken, Was it claimed? I’ve got 67 min

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.57

Thread: 92204

Goal time by Seasick seadog User: Seasick seadog

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 16:11:14, 203 views.

Anyone know time of golden goal yesterday?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.132

RE: Goal time by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 16:46:21, 192 views. In reply to 'Goal time'

67th minute I think

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: RE: Goal time by The guy who announced it!

Posted: 2/3/2019 at 11:11:46, 120 views. In reply to 'RE: Goal time'

It was announced at the match as 66 minutes.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 81.159.196.121

Thread: 92203

Too many players? by Mike Sims

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 09:19:52, 285 views.

As well as the 16 players in the squad yesterday. We had Cadman, Gooda, Valentine and McNaughton not involved with Watson and Davey still to come back. The Manager can’t keep 22 players happy.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.57

Rated by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 17:15:16, 275 views. In reply to 'Too many players?'

What would you rate ,out of ,10 the Players kt as acquired since we got promotion, I have yet to see anybody that stands out..Watson being the best up to press , our gate seems to be dropping as well as our position .

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 86.151.161.47

RE: Rated by beckywitch User: beckywitch

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 17:35:03, 262 views. In reply to 'Rated'

I think it’s unfair to do this. Firstly, it’s often a matter of opinion, but more importantly we want them to get on with one another and gel as a team. Comparing one with another isn’t going to help in that regard.

beckywitch

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7d:8673:d700:f

RE: RE: Rated by Geoff Hooley

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 20:37:31, 329 views. In reply to 'RE: Rated'

Gel as a team ,! Let me no when that happens.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.159

Thread: 92202

Is it time? by Derek Abbeys barnet

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 20:51:44, 318 views.

For Kitkat to do one & invest his £700 per week salary in the playing squad? The Happy Clappers won’t like it but this is a terrible division & we’re stuck in it for another year

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.69

Where’s Valentine? by Harry H Dunnes frisbee

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 21:09:04, 285 views. In reply to 'Is it time?'

He’s crap but he’s better than Brooksby - which isn’t saying much

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 51.9.164.143

RE: Is it time? by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 21:22:41, 304 views. In reply to 'Is it time?'

If you think this is a terrible division and we are “stuck” in it then i’m guessing you’ve never been to Bridlington on a Tuesday night to watch NCEL (Div 1) football?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.137

RE: RE: Is it time? by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 21:51:25, 275 views. In reply to 'RE: Is it time?'

Ridiculous comment by someone who clearly can’t have be been watching the club for long. Yes it’s terrible compared to the football league but some of us have been watching the club ever since we reformed

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

RE: RE: Is it time? by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 21:51:26, 279 views. In reply to 'RE: Is it time?'

Ridiculous comment by someone who clearly can’t have be been watching the club for long. Yes it’s terrible compared to the football league but some of us have been watching the club ever since we reformed

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Be positive by Kilham seadog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 23:05:29, 309 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: Is it time?'

Yes I watched the team in Brid for many years and went away to places like Nobel miners welfare (no offence to rthtm) but we just hoped to survive a few more years to get back home. All our managers, directors and volunteers worked bloody hard so let us appreciate where we are. We nearly went broke if you remember with emergency fan contributions. Missing promotion is sad but there is always next year. We have a ground, a plan, a board and a 1000 plus fans.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.137

RE: Be positive by dogtanian User: dogtanian

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 01:40:29, 304 views. In reply to 'Be positive'

Hear hear

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

RE: Be positive by caslad User: caslad

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 08:31:40, 254 views. In reply to 'Be positive'

At the beginning of the season I would have been happy with mid table obscurity. The problem with being up at the head of the table all season is it gives you hope, but it also shows up the frailties of the team as a whole. The present squad is good enough to survive in this division, even flirt with the play offs, but promotion without substantial investment would only lead to a very poor season and relegation.

Build the team slowly in order to not only gain promotion but achieve a level we can sustain.with the resources we have. If that means another couple of seasons in this division then so be it.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.107

RE: RE: Be positive by Burniston User: Burniston

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 11:44:53, 250 views. In reply to 'RE: Be positive'

Exactly how I feel Caslad.

PMA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.78

A terrible division? by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 12:19:56, 256 views. In reply to 'Is it time?'

Really??

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Thread: 92201

I listened to the Radio commentary by Guy Fawkes User: Guy Fawkes

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 19:54:07, 211 views.

and the guys were trying to make a ‘disappointing’ performance sound interesting. It sounded lacklustre at best. The Club’s Official twitter feed during the game seems to replicate that.

So, it’s what, 7 - 8 weeks since SK chucked his No. 2 under the bus in order to buy himself some more time? Since then results have been what? Average? Ok? - certainly doesn’t seem better than that. What about performances? SK said at the time he wanted to take us in a different direction. Now I’ve just returned from the Far East and haven’t had chance to see us much during that time - so can anyone enlighten me as to the different direction we are taking?

Formation? Tactics? Shape? Personnel? (The Board seem to have been more than supportive with the number of signings over this period)

Accepting we are still thereabouts in the play off race, performances such as todays aren’t going to keep us there too much longer. Are we getting close to needing a change?

(Geoff - all yours)

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

RE: I listened to the Radio commentary by geoff hooley

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 20:15:29, 199 views. In reply to 'I listened to the Radio commentary'

here go,s ,a few comments I heard at the pitch side ,was its like watching England !!!, god it was worse than that , tommy got mom ,must have been for kicking into touch, made one great save , defence was same old same kick it as high as you can and hope for the best ,didn’t anybody notice they had 3 six footers at the back? midfield made more back and side passes than forward .why not just get it in the box , coolou & wally had maybe two good chances each , and fluffed them, give the armband to someone else and do what your good at. I think kt is a very worried man at the moment , or maybe like me he thinks between 12th and 6th position is where we deserve to be. yours truly your resident cynic

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.15

Thread: 92200

Interview with Mickleover goalscorer by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 19:08:55, 223 views.

https://youtu.be/hgiv5tT-0oA

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.137

Interview with Mickleover manager by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 13:24:09, 179 views. In reply to 'Interview with Mickleover goalscorer'

https://youtu.be/ypn05lPNgx0

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.111.135

Interview with Steve Kittrick after Mickleover game by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 13:49:18, 194 views. In reply to 'Interview with Mickleover manager'

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/video-interview-with-scarborough-athletic-boss-steve-kittrick-after-the-loss-against-mickleover-1-9612933

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:1

Thread: 92199

Today’s results by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 17:35:29, 158 views.

Bamber Bridge 0-2 South Shields
Basford 2-2 Stafford
Buxton 1-2 Hednesford
Farsley 0-1 Witton
Grantham 2-0 Matlock
Hyde 3-0 Whitby
Marine 0-2 Workington
North Ferriby 0-4 Gainsborough
Boro 0-2 Mickleover
Stalybridge 1-2 Lancaster
Warrington 3-3 Nantwich

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Thread: 92198

Boro line-up today by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 15:11:31, 202 views.

1. Taylor
2. Lacey
3. Merris
4. Dean
5. Killock
6. Williamson
7. Brooksby
8. Dixon
9. Walshaw
10. Coulson (c)
11. Lofts

Subs: Johnson, Morgan, Burgess, Forrester, Annan

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:2

Latest Scores in Evo-Stik Premier by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 15:35:07, 210 views. In reply to 'Boro line-up today'

https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/northern-premier-league-premier-division

Edited on 23/02/19 at 15:45:48
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.78

Attendance: 945 n/t by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 16:11:36, 154 views. In reply to 'Latest Scores in Evo-Stik Premier'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:2

Gainsborough winning 3-0 by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 16:19:34, 146 views. In reply to 'Attendance: 945 n/t'

Farsley and Warrington both losing.

Edited on 23/02/19 at 16:20:35
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:3827:8300:2

Latest: Boro 0-1 MICKLEOVER SPORTS by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 16:29:43, 169 views. In reply to 'Gainsborough winning 3-0'

Penalty scored by Levi Amantchi

Edited on 23/02/19 at 16:44:31
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.137

Latest: Boro 0-2 MICKLEOVER SPORTS by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 16:31:59, 179 views. In reply to 'Latest: Boro 0-1 MICKLEOVER SPORTS'

Levi Amantchi with his second
Geoff Hooley is gonna have a field day tonight.

Edited on 23/02/19 at 16:44:59
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.54.137

Full-Time 0-2. Boro drop out of play-off spot by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 16:57:03, 203 views. In reply to 'Latest: Boro 0-2 MICKLEOVER SPORTS'

dropping into 6th place

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156

Just asking by cynic

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 18:55:57, 235 views. In reply to 'Full-Time 0-2. Boro drop out of play-off spot'

Might have missed any info but Cadman played last week and not on bench today - injured?

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.60

Re: Just asking by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 20:52:19, 217 views. In reply to 'Just asking'

Cadman, Valentine and Gooda all dropped to the stand. Inexplicable to me, but suppose attacking, technical and creative players must be surplus to requirement? Especially when we prefer to play hoof ball.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 2a02:c7f:5e33:5200:4

Cadman by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 21:07:30, 215 views. In reply to 'Re: Just asking'

Just going from SK interview snippets, but Kittrick said “we need to look after Cadman at the moment" or something similar. I know he’s got a new baby and lives down in South Yorkshire, so we musn’t forget there might be personal reasons why he’s not quite right to play at the moment.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

Re:Cadman et al by Tommy Wooton

Posted: 24/2/2019 at 09:00:46, 163 views. In reply to 'Cadman'

By the look on his face, Cadman has obviously got different ideas of what ‘being looked after’ means. SK has a history of consigning him to the bench or the stand, so this is nothing new.
I have to also mention his post match interview. I would never be classed as an admirer of him, so my responses tend to be negative. Nevertheless I commend and thank him for steering us up into this league. He made comment that some players had left early and that he was angry about this as we should ‘win and lose’ (and presumably sit in the stand) together as a team. Is he implying that there is loyalty involved? I don’t know who left, but the 3 players in the stand also helped us win promotion, as did the former assistant manager, so not much loyalty there.
I very rarely agree with him, but did agree to a certain extent with his comment. However, there are lots of ‘ifs’ and ‘buts.’ Some players are more than willing to travel substantial distances, not all the players are on the same money and earn 2, 3 or 4 times more than others, some have contracts which means that they are paid whether they’re in the squad or not and others get nothing. I don’t know of individual players circumstances, but if they are contracted and are not losing out financially ( eg petrol) and they actually understand why they have been left out, I agree with him. Otherwise I wouldn’t particularly expect them to stay all of the time. It’s like being invited to a party and being made to watch through a window, whilst paying for the privilege.
As for his comments about people staying off social media - ironic that his interview was on a social media platform and perhaps the club marketing team, sponsors and advertisers might disagree.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.78

Breathless by Harry H Dunnes frisbee

Posted: 23/2/2019 at 21:06:23, 202 views. In reply to 'Boro line-up today'

eWWw

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 51.9.164.143

Thread: 92197

Interview with Michael Coulson by Paper User: Paper

Posted: 21/2/2019 at 10:31:12, 492 views.

https://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/michael-coulson-proud-to-be-scarborough-athletic-skipper-1-9607727

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 172.69.55.156
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29
© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.