Newest Message: RE: Golden Boot by geoff hooley on 18/4/2019, 13:22:08 - View Thread

4

Thread: 92141

BORO lead 1-0 by Old Git

Posted: 22/1/2019 at 20:09:15, 194 views.

Jamie Forrester smashes in from 35 yards.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

1-1 Guis with pen after Valentine foul by Old Git

Posted: 22/1/2019 at 20:18:05, 142 views. In reply to 'BORO lead 1-0'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

FT: Boro 2-1 Guisborough by Armchairdog User: Armchairdog

Posted: 22/1/2019 at 21:42:50, 179 views. In reply to '1-1 Guis with pen after Valentine foul'

Coulo with the winning goal.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.93.143

RE: FT: Boro 2-1 Guisborough by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 22/1/2019 at 22:06:12, 209 views. In reply to 'FT: Boro 2-1 Guisborough'

Wasn’t a vintage display by any means and for much of the first half they were actually the better team, but we ground it out against a team we’d never beaten before and grabbed the win. We took off Watson and Killock in the first half for injuries so I don’t know if they were precautionary or more serious. Brooksby later replaced McNaughton, and so when both Brooksby and Valentine went down injured it looked like we’d have to finish with at most 10 men but they both battled on bravely. No complaints from me about the penalty, it was nailed on

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.162

RE: RE: FT: Boro 2-1 Guisborough by vernon

Posted: 22/1/2019 at 22:35:40, 201 views. In reply to 'RE: FT: Boro 2-1 Guisborough'

dont imagine farsley scouts will be worried having watched that, we look poor, midfield 2nd to everything, no cohesion, reliant on coulo magic, why cant we try and play it on the deck. painful

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.93.149

guisborough by leicesterlad

Posted: 22/1/2019 at 22:59:13, 210 views. In reply to 'RE: RE: FT: Boro 2-1 Guisborough'

For those who have not been to guisborough it is a beautiful small market town (village)approx 10 miles from middlesborough. Strong team tonight but we struggle against a team who probably do not even get a penny for turning out to play.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.174

Not a bad gate for the game 423, by Seamer unreg

Posted: 23/1/2019 at 11:45:17, 232 views. In reply to 'BORO lead 1-0'


  • Reply
  • IP Address: 109.153.229.58

can anyone remember… by Dunno

Posted: 23/1/2019 at 17:06:20, 254 views. In reply to 'Not a bad gate for the game 423, '

what crowds we used to get at the McStad for these matches. I remember going to a couple but seem to remember they weren’t treated as seriously as now and crowds were very low.

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.89.243

Yes… by Malton Seadog User: Malton Seadog

Posted: 23/1/2019 at 17:37:58, 233 views. In reply to 'can anyone remember…'

In the 2003/04 season, we played the previous season’s final during the July pre-season against Middlesbrough (youth) at the McCain Stadium. 552 turned up.

The next season, the same thing happened, against the same opposition, in front of a slightly higher 800.

On 10th January 2005, just 9 days after our wonderful 0-2 victory at Bootham Crescent, I was one of 293 who saw us beat Dormans Athletic at the McCain in the quarter final. So - there’s your best comparison. About 150-200 better off last night than in the olden days, but we didn’t treat it as a first team fixture back then, just like York/Middlesbrough don’t now, so it’s not a totally fair comparison.

Edited on 23/01/19 at 17:39:42
  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

RE: Yes… by seadog365 User: seadog365

Posted: 23/1/2019 at 18:11:51, 305 views. In reply to 'Yes…'

Wonder what happened to Dormans. You never get them in the NRSC any more

  • Reply
  • IP Address: 162.158.34.150

Newer Thread: Is it too early…

Older Thread: Gooda Suspension

© Surfing Seadog. All Rights Reserved. Site design and development: Steve Smith

Views expressed on this forum are those of the individual poster, and not of the site administrators,scarborough athletic football club or the seadog trust unless otherwise stated.